ࡱ > M bjbj== ; W W Q l < < < < % % % 8 V% 4 % `b 2 R& V ( " ( ( ( + %, 4 Y, a a a a a a a $ c e : a u, -+ ^ + u, u, a A0 < < ( ( M b " A0 A0 A0 u, < l ( ( 1] A0 u, a A0 T A0 7 n 1W , Z ( F& Uf 6 % / 9X Z , $b < `b YX f / | f Z A0 < < < <
Paid Work and Family Responsibilities Submission Sex Discrimination Unit, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission GPO Box 5218 Sydney NSW 2001
Friday, 14 October 2005
Please find attached the National Tertiary Education Unions (NTEU) submission to the Striking the Balance: Women, men, work and family Discussion Paper 2005.
NTEU welcomes the opportunity to provide input into such an important issue, and believes the discussion paper is a timely contribution to public debates about industrial relations, welfare reform and caring work.
The Union looks forward to the outcomes of this review and the release of HREOCs final paper on the issue.
In the meantime, we would be happy to provide additional comments or qualifications on any of the issues raised in this submission.
If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact Julie Connolly, NTEU National Industrial Officer on HYPERLINK "mailto:jconnolly@nteu.edu.au" jconnolly@nteu.edu.au or 03 9254 1910.
Yours Sincerely
Dr Carolyn Allport
NATIONAL PRESIDENT
Contents
Introduction
Recommendations
Equal Opportunity and Gender Pay Equity
Cultural change in university management and family friendly workplaces
Workloads and hours
Part-time and casual work
Industrial Relations
Legislative and policy framework in higher education
Conclusion
References
Tables
2.1 Academic Staff by gender, Classification and Level, 2004
3.1 Growth in Employment Type 1994-2003
1.0 Introduction
The National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) represents the professional and industrial interests of 27,000 academic and general staff employed in Australian higher education institutions, adult and vocational education, including 14,333 women.
The NTEU welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commissions (HREOC) discussion paper Striking the Balance: Women, men, work and family. The discussion paper is a timely contribution to public debates about industrial relations, welfare reform and caring work.
The NTEU shares HREOCs commitment to the development of a legislative framework and a policy environment that acknowledges the significant amounts of unpaid caring work that women do and how this affects womens capacity to participate in paid work, progress through career structures and sustain personal relationships. The NTEU also shares HREOCs broader concerns about the balance between paid work and unpaid caring work on individuals, including carers and dependents, industries and the Australian nation as a whole.
The NTEU commends HREOC for its comprehensive and detailed analysis of the issues surrounding Striking the Balance. Rather than address each of the questions listed at the conclusion of the paper, the following submission responds to the some key issues examined in the discussion paper that are also of particular relevance to our members in the higher education sector. These include:
Equal opportunity in the work place and gender pay equity,
Cultural change in university management and family friendly workplaces,
Industrial relations regulation,
Legislative and policy framework in higher education.
The following submission is structured around these four issues. First, by reviewing the patterns of womens employment in higher education, we establish that womens caring responsibilities affect equal opportunity and gender pay equity. Although further research is warranted, caring responsibilities have emerged as a factor that helps to explain why women are not equally represented in senior classifications in higher education.
Altering the social conditions that produce inequitable results for women in employment may entail a wholesale cultural shift, involving the attitudes, expectations and relationships of individuals ADDIN EN.CITE Pocock20055 p3805Pocock, Barbara2005Work/care Regimes: Institutions, Culture and Behaviour and the Australian CaseGender, Work and Organisation12132-49(Pocock, 2005 p38). Nonetheless, in this submission the NTEU analyses the implication of the above findings for University management, industrial relations and the broader policy and legislative environment. Although the lessons learnt in higher education reflect the specificities of employment in this sector, the NTEU believes that they are germane to other industries, particularly other types of professional work.
1.1 Recommendations
The NTEU recommends:
That HREOC investigates an appropriate mechanism for developing a comprehensive national database system to monitor Australian womens participation and employment status;
That the Government contribute funding for the provision of flexible and affordable childcare that can accommodate the demands of professional women whose hours are variable;
That HREOC advocate the development of work-based child-care options across industries;
That HREOC encourage and support university equity units to conduct research into the impact of the scheduling of classes, seminars and conferences, and workplace meetings on staff with caring responsibilities;
That HREOC encourage universities to review general staff classifications according to the principles of comparable worth with similar occupations, giving regard to qualifications, award structures, career paths, remuneration and skill and responsibility levels;
That the use of casual and fixed term labour is monitored and restricted;
That the right to bargain collectively in regard to pay and conditions is protected;
That a safety net of minimum pay and conditions and the right to settle industrial and employment disputes are protected and maintained by and an independent arbitrator such as the Australian Industrial Relations Commission;
That HREOC conduct research into the impacts of the Governments industrial relations reforms on women, one year after they are implemented;
The expansion of leave entitlements for those with caring responsibilities, in particular increased parental and carers leave with more flexible return to work options;
That Government ensure that its industrial, education and social policies do not disadvantage the participation and career prospects of employees who take career breaks.
2.0 Equal Opportunity in the workplace and gender pay equity
In the Foreword to the discussion paper, Pru Goward ADDIN EN.CITE Goward200514 pxi1014Pru GowardTania Mihailuk Sally MoyleKaren O'ConnellNatasha de SilvaSarah SquireJo TillyShauneen O'Connell2005Striking the Balance: Women, men, work and family Discussion paper 2005CanberraHREOC135(Goward et al., 2005 pxi) notes that the numbers of women in paid employment, education and public life have increased substantially over the past few decades. This conclusion is reflected in the changing profile of Australians higher education workforce.
In the decade to 1998 the number of women employed as a proportion of academic staff (excluding casuals) increased by 28 per cent to represent 34 per cent of staff employed in academic classifications, and the number of women employed in a non-academic capacity rose by 10 per cent to 59 per cent of non-academic staff ADDIN EN.CITE Jones19997167Emily JonesMark UrbanSandy StevensonMaureen MaclachlanTom Karmel1999University Staff 1989 to 1998Higher Education SeriesCanberra200519/09/http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/hes/hes35.htm(Jones et al., 1999). By 2004 women represented 39 per cent of the academic workforce and 61 per cent of the non-academic workforce in Australian universities (again excluding casual employees) ADDIN EN.CITE DEST2003101610DEST2003Selected higher education staff statistics, 2003200519/09http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/FBA4E192-261B-47C8-BACC-3F1B59F8879D/2456/staff2003.xls#Contents!A1(DEST, 2004). Women have also made inroads into senior position within Australian universities. The proportion of female Deputy/ProVice-Chancellors has been stable at about 17% since 1996 while the number of female Vice-Chancellors has increased from two in 1996 to eleven as at October 2003 ADDIN EN.CITE Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee20059169Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee,2005University Staff Profile - The Facts200519/09http://www.avcc.edu.au/documents/publications/facts/UniversityStaffProfiles_Facts.pdf(Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee, 2005b). In addition, the Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee (AVCC) reported that the number of senior university women has increased 16%, albeit from a low base, since 2004 ADDIN EN.CITE Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee2005111611Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee,2005Female staff numbers increasing in Australian Universities: Media Relaeses 2005200520/09http://www.avcc.edu.au/content.asp?page=/news/media_releases/2005/avcc_media_10_05.htm(Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee, 2005a).
Although the number of women employed in higher education, including senior positions has increased substantially since the development of a unitary higher education system, their representation at all levels of the career structure still lags behind men. The table below provides a snapshot of the numbers of men and women employed in Australian universities in 2004. Whilst well represented at Levels A and B, the numbers of women drop sharply compared to the number of men employed at Level C and above.
Academic Staff by Gender, Classification and Level, 2004
Level% Female % Male % of academic staff at each levelFemaleMaleA25.014.551.948.1B40.629.246.653.4C22.426.734.565.5D7.315.023.476.6E4.414.016.683.4VC/DVC0.30.626.573.5Sub Total Academic100%100%38.661.4Non Academic60.539.5Total51.348.7
These statistics help explain some of the reasons why women have not achieved pay equity in higher education. In 1998, the NTEU published a gender pay equity study in higher education (Probert et al., 1998). 1996 data for this study indicated that that male academic staff earnt on average $439 per fortnight more than their female colleagues, for general staff the discrepancy was $264 ADDIN EN.CITE Probert1998151015Probert, BelindaPeter EwerKim Whiting1998Gender Pay Equity in Australian Higher EducationMelbourneNTEU(Probert et al., 1998). NTEU is currently investigating commissioning another study into pay equity in higher education to map not only the changes in gender pay equity, but also any changes in the causes of such inequity. Given womens under-representation in senior classifications, it is more than likely that the gender pay gap in higher education will continue to persist.
There are a number of reasons for womens under-representation at senior levels of the academic workforce. These include systemic discrimination ADDIN EN.CITE Probert20043 p33163Probert, Belinda2004If only it were a glass ceiling: Gendered academic careersCharlesworth, SaraMaureen FasteanuWomen and Work: Current RMIT University ResearchMelbourneCentre for Applied Social Research, RMIT Melbournehttp://mams.rmit.edu.au/m0t03gq5u9wb.pdf(Probert, 2004 p33) and cultural issues ADDIN EN.CITE Kjeldal200516016Kjeldal, Sue-EllenJennifer RindfeishAlison Sheridon2005Deal-making and rule-breaking: behind the facade of equity in academiaGender and Education174431-477(Kjeldal et al., 2005). The latter category involves both the masculinism of work place and particular management practices ADDIN EN.CITE Chesterman12 p1012Colleen ChestermanAnn Ross-SmithMargaret PetersChanging the landscape? Women in academic leadership in Australia(Chesterman et al., p1) and womens own assessment of their capacity and worth ADDIN EN.CITE Pocock20055 p3805Pocock, Barbara2005Work/care Regimes: Institutions, Culture and Behaviour and the Australian CaseGender, Work and Organisation12132-49(Pocock, 2005 p38). In addition, the 1998 NTEU study found gender bias in the construction of general staff classifications, perhaps explaining why women have not progressed through that career structure at the same rate as men (Probert et al., 1998)
Human capital theory has also been used to account for womens participation and progression through the career structure. According to this theory, experience, skills and qualifications account for differences in performance in a competitive labour market. In the NTEU Pay Equity study, Probert found that family responsibilities impact on womens capacity to complete a PhD . DEST data for 2004 shows that 37 per cent of all male academic staff had a Doctorate compared to only 18 per cent of female academic staff. In her analysis, Probert found this has a significant impact on career progression because a PhD is a threshold qualification for an academic career ADDIN EN.CITE Probert199815 p231015Probert, BelindaPeter EwerKim Whiting1998Gender Pay Equity in Australian Higher EducationMelbourneNTEU(Probert et al., 1998 p23).
Probert also found that whilst there was some truth to all of the arguments that have been submitted to explain womens employment patterns in higher education, there has been too little analysis of the impact of family and caring responsibilities on women. She concludes that the relentless and continuous collision between work and life on a daily and weekly basis ADDIN EN.CITE Probert20043 p22163Probert, Belinda2004If only it were a glass ceiling: Gendered academic careersCharlesworth, SaraMaureen FasteanuWomen and Work: Current RMIT University ResearchMelbourneCentre for Applied Social Research, RMIT Melbournehttp://mams.rmit.edu.au/m0t03gq5u9wb.pdf(Probert, 2004 p22) has a profound impact on womens working lives, and that this distinguishes their experience of employment from men.
While much needs to be done to change cultural stereotypes about the gendered nature of particular types of work, both in the family and in the workplace, addressing the income and status disparities between women and men will go a long way to creating more equal balance between work and family and between women and men.
In the remainder of this submission, we examine possible reforms for three levels of policy development, which could contribute to achieving a fair and just balance between paid and unpaid work and thereby support the career aspirations of women in higher education.
3.0 Cultural Change in university management and family friendly work places
The NTEU concurs with HREOCs conclusion that the workplace is obviously a key arena where paid work and family issues are played out ADDIN EN.CITE Goward200514 p1301014Pru GowardTania Mihailuk Sally MoyleKaren O'ConnellNatasha de SilvaSarah SquireJo TillyShauneen O'Connell2005Striking the Balance: Women, men, work and family Discussion paper 2005CanberraHREOC135(Goward et al., 2005 p130). This finding is certainly germane to higher education. Like other sectors of the Australian economy work has intensified in higher education, workloads have increased and there is evidence that members of both academic and general staff are working longer hours ADDIN EN.CITE McInnes199813 p41613Craig McInnes1998Change and Continuity in Academic WorkHigher Education SeriesCanberraDepartment of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affiars200520/09/http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/hes/hes30.pdf(McInnes, 1998 p4). These factors contribute to reports of greater stress at work and greater levels of job dissatisfaction ADDIN EN.CITE McConville200017 p451017Greg McConvilleCarloyn Allport2000Unhealth Places of Learning: Working in Australian UniversitiesMelbourneNational Tertiary Education Union(NTEU, 2000 p45). In this section we will examine the impact of these factors on the development of workplace culture and practices that are conducive to striking a better balance between paid work and caring responsibilities.
At the campus level in higher education two factors have particular implications for the development of a family friendly workplace: the management of workloads and hours, and the growth in casual and part-time work.
3.1 Workloads and Hours
A study completed by Winefield et al ADDIN EN.CITE Winefield200218 p 911018Winefield, Anthony H.Nicole GiollespieCon StoughJagdish DuaJohn Hapuararchchci2002Occupational Stress in Australian Universities: A National SurveyMelbourneNational Tertiary Education Union(Winefield et al., 2002 p 91) concluded that staff at Australian universities experienced much more occupational stress than the general population and as a consequence were much more at risk of associated mental and physical health problems. This finding is of itself cause for concern and suggests the difficulties University staff face in balancing relationships and caring responsibilities with work pressures. The same study found that academic staff worked on average 55 hours per week, with 30 per cent of staff working upwards of this amount; over 80 per cent of general staff reported working over-time in the week proceeding, the bulk of whom did not expect payment for the additional hours worked ADDIN EN.CITE Winefield200218 p 911018Winefield, Anthony H.Nicole GiollespieCon StoughJagdish DuaJohn Hapuararchchci2002Occupational Stress in Australian Universities: A National SurveyMelbourneNational Tertiary Education Union(Winefield et al., 2002 p 91). Together these findings signal that working in Australias universities does not facilitate family-life.
Historically the hours worked by academic staff have not been regulated ADDIN EN.CITE McConville200017 p 111017Greg McConvilleCarloyn Allport2000Unhealth Places of Learning: Working in Australian UniversitiesMelbourneNational Tertiary Education Union(NTEU, 2000 p 11). Some Certified Agreements now contain caps on the number of hours to be worked per year. In other institutions hours are only regulated through limits placed on teaching time and staff student ratios. Probert (2004) reports that the lack of regulation concerning hours worked is a double-edged sword for academic women who have caring responsibilities. The lack of regulation supports the professional autonomy of academics and promotes flexibility; nonetheless it is possible that the flexibility of academic work makes it more difficult for women to exert the power of absence since there are relatively few hours when they are required to be in the workplace ADDIN EN.CITE Probert20043 p25163Probert, Belinda2004If only it were a glass ceiling: Gendered academic careersCharlesworth, SaraMaureen FasteanuWomen and Work: Current RMIT University ResearchMelbourneCentre for Applied Social Research, RMIT Melbournehttp://mams.rmit.edu.au/m0t03gq5u9wb.pdf(Probert, 2004 p25). This means that female academics caring responsibilities might be largely invisible to their colleagues.
Also specific to academic work is the necessity to attend conferences and seminars, which are often organised outside of normal working hours, in order to present research and develop networks. In addition teaching can be scheduled in evenings and on weekends to accommodate part-time students and intensive modes of course presentation. Associated with academic work is a culturally entrenched expectation that members of academic staff have flexible schedules and this is certainly not the case for members of staff responsible for child-care. Anecdotal evidence suggests that these factors pose problems for members of staff, normally women, with responsibility for child-care ADDIN EN.CITE Probert20043 p22163Probert, Belinda2004If only it were a glass ceiling: Gendered academic careersCharlesworth, SaraMaureen FasteanuWomen and Work: Current RMIT University ResearchMelbourneCentre for Applied Social Research, RMIT Melbournehttp://mams.rmit.edu.au/m0t03gq5u9wb.pdf(Probert, 2004 p22). In combination, all these factors point to the importance of regulating workloads and monitoring hours worked as an integral part of producing academic workplaces in which both men and women with caring responsibilities can flourish.
Recommendations:
That the Government contribute funding for the provision of flexible and affordable childcare that can accommodate the demands of professional women whose hours and variable;
That HREOC advocate the development of work-based child-care options across industries;
3.2 Part-time and Casual Employment
Casual employment is the fastest growing type of employment in higher education. Casuals now represent approximately 15.5 per cent of the university workforce, whereas in 1994 casuals represented approximately 11.2 per cent of the casual workforce. As indicated in the table below this represents a 55.3 per cent increase in the number of casuals employed in Australian Universities. The majority of casuals are employed as teaching staff ADDIN EN.CITE Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee20059169Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee,2005University Staff Profile - The Facts200519/09http://www.avcc.edu.au/documents/publications/facts/UniversityStaffProfiles_Facts.pdf(Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee, 2005b). Given that women in higher education are over-represented, both relative to men and their overall participation, in lower levels of academic classification, the growth in casual employment is likely to have a continuing and significant impact on their participation and career development.
Table 3.1 Growth in Employment Type 1994-2003
YearFull-time
Fractional Full-timeEstimated CasualNumber % IncreaseNumber % IncreaseNumber % Increase199463,4356,8238,895200366,3014.5 %9,25435.6 %13,81555.3 %
Source: ADDIN EN.CITE DEST2003101610DEST2003Selected higher education staff statistics, 2003200519/09http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/FBA4E192-261B-47C8-BACC-3F1B59F8879D/2456/staff2003.xls#Contents!A1(DEST, 2003)
Striking the Balance contains a detailed analysis of the implication of casual and part-time work on women with caring responsibilities ADDIN EN.CITE Goward200514 p22-241014Pru GowardTania Mihailuk Sally MoyleKaren O'ConnellNatasha de SilvaSarah SquireJo TillyShauneen O'Connell2005Striking the Balance: Women, men, work and family Discussion paper 2005CanberraHREOC135(Goward et al., 2005 p22-24). We will not repeat these findings here except to say that, within higher education, managerial prerogative, not womens choices about work-family balance have driven the significant increase in the availability of fractional and casual work. This is the case even where working part-time is a strategic response to motherhood.
Higher education was the first industry covered by the Affirmative Action (Equal Opportunities for Women) Act 1986. Australian universities have in place equal opportunity and anti-discrimination policies that give affect to relevant state and federal legislation. Nonetheless forms of discrimination continue to exist ADDIN EN.CITE Kjeldal200516016Kjeldal, Sue-EllenJennifer RindfeishAlison Sheridon2005Deal-making and rule-breaking: behind the facade of equity in academiaGender and Education174431-477(Kjeldal et al., 2005). The real question is whether such legislative frameworks enhance womens ability to balance work and family in a productive way that meets both their needs and those of their employers. The above analysis suggests that systemic factors regarding growing workloads, span of hours and the availability of different types of employment have a differential impact on men and women, particularly those with responsibility for children and other dependents.
Again, while cultural change is crucial to ensuring that such policies are effectively implemented and able to be utilised, such change will only be affected with the support of appropriate industrial and systemic structures.
Recommendations:
That HREOC encourage and support university equity units to conduct research into the impact of the scheduling of classes, seminars and conferences, and workplace meetings on staff with caring responsibilities;
4.0 Industrial Relations
The industrial relations arena has proved central to the NTEUs campaign to improve the working conditions of all of our members including women and men with caring responsibilities. During the last round of Enterprise Bargaining, the NTEU was able to achieve greater recognition of same-sex relationships, rest pauses for breast feeding, increases to paid parental leave of up to 26 weeks and the inclusion of carers leave in many of our Certified Agreements. In addition and following a decision by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) in 1998, the NTEU has introduced and defended limits on the use of fixed-term and casual employment. Together these achievements have improved working conditions for members of staff with caring responsibilities.
The industrial strategy employed by the NTEU includes bargaining at the enterprise level for above-Award rates and conditions. This strategy has proved to be an effective way to address some of the issues that have been discussed in this paper. Nonetheless, this strategy is under threat by the Federal governments Higher Education Workplace Relations Requirements (HEWRRs). Using the rhetoric of simplicity and flexibility, the HEWRRs intend to limit the influence of the NTEU. In addition, the HEWRRS necessitate lifting restrictions on the use of fixed-term and casual employment. Although it is difficult to anticipate the exact impact of the HEWRRs, they have already shifted the balance in industrial relations in favour of management against staff rights and needs.
Inter alia, the HEWRRs illustrate an attempt to impose general community or minimum standards on university communities. The continued progress of women through general and academic classifications, and the capacity of all staff to balance work and family, depends in no small part on our ability to collectively bargain improvements in working conditions. The NTEU has had some success at introducing broadbanding into the classification system, which at least in the middle bands, does give women the ability to move to higher pay levels within a more permeable classification system. Similarly, the inclusion of promotion procedures within collective agreements means that NTEU Branches are able to monitor the success rates for promotion by gender. Removal of such protections under the HEWRRs and through the introduction of AWAs could see womens status and participation within the sector deteriorate even further.
The Federal Governments legislative agenda for the industrial relations system in Australia has not yet been released in its entirety, although general proposals have circulated. The Governments current industrial relations agenda will almost certainly have a detrimental impact on working conditions for women. Women make up more than 60% of award-dependent employees, and will be hit particularly hard by proposals to abolish many guaranteed conditions available to employees through the award system. Without award conditions, many women will be forced to negotiate with their employers for basic rights and conditions, such as leave provisions and penalty rates. Also of particular concern for women are proposals to abolish skill based wage rates and to change the way that minimum wages are set.
Recommendations
That HREOC encourage universities to review general staff classifications according to the principles of comparable worth with similar occupations, giving regard to qualifications, award structures, career paths, remuneration and skill and responsibility levels;
That the use of casual and fixed term labour is monitored and restricted;
That the right to bargain collectively in regard to pay and conditions is protected;
That a safety net of minimum pay and conditions and the right to settle industrial and employment disputes are protected and maintained by and an independent arbitrator such as the Australian Industrial Relations Commission;
That HREOC conduct research into the impacts of the Governments industrial relations reforms on women, one year after they are implemented;
5.0 Legislative and policy framework in higher education
The higher education sector in Australia has experienced significant reform since the Dawkins reforms where initiated in 1989. These changes have been driven by a complex matrix of factors including Government policy, technological innovation in teaching and research, and internationalisation. In combination these factors have influenced administration, teaching, research and management practices within universities. Arguably of the greatest significance, however, has been the decline of Federal Government funding to the sector. This has a significant impact on the capacity of Australian universities to provide just and internationally competitive working conditions for staff.
All of the above mentioned factors have the capacity to impact on womens participation, pay and status within in the sector, whether it be through the segregation of particular types of work labelled as womens work and the undervaluation of such tasks and skills or in policies which penalise those who have career breaks due to caring responsibilities. It is critical that Government policies and management practices are monitored to ensure that they do not either directly or indirectly further contribute to the discrimination against womens career prospects and advancement within the sector.
To achieve work and family balance, it is also essential that Government policies do not discriminate against either women or men who take career breaks. Policies such as the soon to be introduced Research Quality Framework (RQF), can significantly impact on womens capacity for career progression. As has been shown through the experience of research assessment mechanisms in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, the use of such instruments disadvantage women who take career breaks and can seriously undermine their prospects for career progression. It is essential that such policies take into account the need for individuals to take career breaks in order to balance work and family commitments, and to ensure that the policies are flexible enough to accommodate those who take such breaks, whether they be women or men, without seriously damaging their career prospects.
Recommendations
The expansion of leave entitlements for those with caring responsibilities, in particular increased parental and carers leave with more flexible return to work options;
That Government ensures that its industrial, education and social policies do not disadvantage the participation and career prospects of employees who take career breaks.
6.0 Conclusion
At the level of individuals, the balance between paid work and caring responsibilities affects the welfare of dependents, the opportunities for carers to pursue paid work, leisure and other forms of civic participation, and the capacity of both to build social capital. In the higher education sector, striking a reasonable balance between paid an unpaid work is important because it affects staff retention, productivity, and thereby international competitiveness, and the capacity of universities to realise equality of opportunity and discharge their community service obligations. For Australia as a whole, striking a balance between paid work and caring responsibilities has a series of positive effects on population growth and the sustainability of the tax-base. For all these reasons HREOCs inquiry is commendable.
Without derogating from the importance of addressing the division of labour within the home and cultural expectations about womens roles and responsibilities, this submission has focused on the impact of issues external to the household. In this submission we have discussed the impact of workplace culture and practice, the industrial relations system and the broader legislative and policy context on work-family balance as relevant to our membership and industry. If reforms were initiated at each of these levels in line with our recommendations a better balance between work and family life that also accommodates the career aspirations of women could be achieved.
7.0 References
ADDIN EN.REFLIST Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee. (2005a) 'Female staff numbers increasing in Australian Universities: Media Relaeses 2005' HYPERLINK "http://www.avcc.edu.au/content.asp?page=/news/media_releases/2005/avcc_media_10_05.htm" http://www.avcc.edu.au/content.asp?page=/news/media_releases/2005/avcc_media_10_05.htm accessed on 20/09 2005
Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee. (2005b) 'University Staff Profile - The Facts' HYPERLINK "http://www.avcc.edu.au/documents/publications/facts/UniversityStaffProfiles_Facts.pdf" http://www.avcc.edu.au/documents/publications/facts/UniversityStaffProfiles_Facts.pdf accessed on 19/09 2005
Chesterman, C., Ross-Smith, A. and Peters, M. (2004) Changing the landscape? Women in academic leadership in Australia http://www.uts.edu.au/oth/wexdev/pdfs/changing_the_landscape.pdf accessed on 1/09/2005
DEST. (2003) 'Selected higher education staff statistics, 2003' HYPERLINK "http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/FBA4E192-261B-47C8-BACC-3F1B59F8879D/2456/staff2003.xls#Contents!A1" http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/FBA4E192-261B-47C8-BACC-3F1B59F8879D/2456/staff2003.xls#Contents!A1 accessed on 19/09/2005
Goward, P., Mihailuk, T., Moyle, S., O'Connell, K., de Silva, N., Squire, S., Tilly, J. and O'Connell, S. (2005) Striking the Balance: Women, men, work and family Discussion paper 2005, HREOC, Canberra
Jones, E., Urban, M., Stevenson, S., Maclachlan, M. and Karmel, T. 1999 University Staff 1989 to 1998 HYPERLINK "http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/hes/hes35.htm" http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/hes/hes35.htm accessed on 19/09/2005
Kjeldal, S.-E., Rindfeish, J. and Sheridon, A. (2005) 'Deal-making and rule-breaking: behind the facade of equity in academia' Gender and Education, 17 (4): 431-477.
NTEU. (2000) Unhealthy Places of Learning: Working in Australian Universities, National Tertiary Education Union, Melbourne
McInnes, C. (1998) 'Change and Continuity in Academic Work' HYPERLINK "http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/hes/hes30.pdf" http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/hes/hes30.pdf accessed on 20/09/2005
Pocock, B. (2005) "Work/care Regimes: Institutions, Culture and Behaviour and the Australian Case" Gender, Work and Organisation, 12 (1): 32-49.
Probert, B. (2004) 'If only it were a glass ceiling: Gendered academic careers' HYPERLINK "http://mams.rmit.edu.au/m0t03gq5u9wb.pdf" http://mams.rmit.edu.au/m0t03gq5u9wb.pdf accessed on 20/09/2005
Probert, B., Ewer, P. and Whiting, K. (1998) Gender Pay Equity in Australian Higher Education, NTEU, Melbourne
Winefield, A. H., Giollespie, N., Stough, C., Dua, J. and Hapuararchchci, J. (2002) Occupational Stress in Australian Universities: A National Survey, National Tertiary Education Union, Melbourne
PAGE
PAGE 12
NTEU Submission
Striking the Balance: Women, men, work and family
Discussion Paper 2005
EMBED Word.Picture.8
NATIONAL OFFICE
ABN 38 579 396 344
First floor, 120 Clarendon St, South Melbourne 3205
PO Box 1323, South Melbourne 3205
Tel: (03) 9254 1910 Fax (03) 9254 1915
Email: nteunat@nteu.org.au
Web: www.nteu.org.au
- ` 9 ) * + , - q Z v v X ^ µ¥ 56\]^J j U
6]^J mH sH CJ OJ QJ ^J CJ ^J mH sH j CJ U^J mH sH ^J 0J j Uj 6U]^J aJ ^J 6] 56\] (j 56CJ U\]mH nH sH u6
` a 8 9 + , ) ) * - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 @ A N ^ _ K L ^
& F
& F L W X c d e l m
# D z { /
& F
& F / 0 t v L M U V ) * 1 2 | } C D h^h
& F ! ! - - / / $0 *0 40 <0 ^0
$$7$ 8$ H$ If a$ " " C% D% X% Y% & & ' ' ' ' )( ( ( * * * * + + + - - - - / $0 )0 *0 ;0 <0 o0 O1 P1 2 2 4 4 4 4 6 6 n9 o9 9 9 9 9 ; ; ; ; < < = = = = = = ? ? ? ? `C aC $E %E ?E @E F F I I I mH sH B*CJ ^J aJ mH ph sH #5B*CJ \^J aJ mH ph sH ^J j B*Uph B*ph j U L^0 _0 `0 a0 b0 i0 n0 @
$$7$ 8$ H$ If a$ n $$If 4 \ , TZ` ` `( 4
a n0 o0 q0 v0 {0 0 0 {\ p b b b b
$$7$ 8$ H$ If a$
$7$ 8$ H$ If $$If 4fr , TZ ( L 4
a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |\ q c c c c |\ q c c c
$$7$ 8$ H$ If a$
$7$ 8$ H$ If $$If r , TZ ( L 4
a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nX c nX c
$7$ 8$ H$ If $$If r , TZ ( L 4
a
$$7$ 8$ H$ If a$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 nh c n c
$7$ 8$ H$ If $$If r , TZ ( L 4
a
$$7$ 8$ H$ If a$ 1 1 1 !1 "1 /1 01 11 61 ;1 <1 B1 nh c nL c
$7$ 8$ H$ If $$If r , TZ ( L 4
a
$$7$ 8$ H$ If a$ B1 C1 D1 I1 N1 O1 P1 Q1 6 6 @ @ BE n l l l l l l l $$If r , TZ ( L 4
a
$$7$ 8$ H$ If a$ BE CE J J aK bK mL oL L L V V rW sW W W _ _ g g 8n 9n Jn Kn n Ro So wo xo
& F
$a$ I I J aK oL L L EM FM O O O O P P XS YS kS lS S S U U U U W W W W Y Y Z Z \ \ ^ ^ _ _ _ _ a a a a Ud Vd 1g 2g Eg Fg [j \j 7m 8m Km Lm 9n Hn Kn n n Qo Ro wo /q 0q s s @s As t t t u u Yu Zu w w %w &w (w d _ی=~nw_{{;2x _|o/=( p3Î;T$ -) ;<
#-_}= ~SmwC GKw9N.[xSy- ow$733O*'Ì쫿^ձ?2\ǁ{ { { {.Ob8Ka{顤Ol vPq{
m!v(ۜ8nEq[ŭ/P 8.jVnm6K2[tq7mQ_ agRsEs s|sM]" l|\`zH.0.`
EɱBĝ.ܠ"2Bi$X6f q7(MD[o7QS@#{4-{H. "(
?s!wࢡA/SAAgux=,˻BL P^e^ϥ" \H\\_ Aa'}!(0/U߰4l7,j7,0l
KV}o%}ú7(Z7(||CMYã$IA . 6u^
p:hrfQߠ6*};\L\oP`{Ӷ̗E}%%Z7$-8Qߐ6um3-
0wԗ5fr wԗhbQ_.O bۗA/'s? »Bl ]ǬkE#Jpqx/EGC/utXdP߽[$rզXtk#kؗmj.
!nWn Pkc/FܾܞPNFw('n
D w!Ʌ!)WqiknWq[Pj (9r}C.Ӫܜ5N+5V;q}6B_E/n-P+5 pH W@*z\Z_I W\W`X$ 0DDj}M+0õ5z;>CUeeОMzsyy}l@N⣫{][p
9K&@p\.OJ:&'$ډ;Njqy nNh]ƥ.'Nt,n}-yֳKOd6mr%4m+rR{ bYO2V6w`6
q}9R_&B~)/968;\iOyԹF hЗfgk4lmnɹeǒMyu'g.{1.yoK9*הNN#\`7>0.YoN_oЗGɭ5JzQuB_s- zmpB 섾"mGEe_ѕ/|>?;+,L\49̜0
, FW+ l'eHn~%wQu^3q!)dj28.I}c18+UuF4۽'UuZ tY=u8svZ9)p"Wk
S4 /Nj}MNsMӸZ_S`sӸZ_Sb
#b 5ƺ 5!0`::!0l5$pO;`{BNWƅg#;ˏg)$f8;)L_+v[CrJ;8;)ݤif
[2 %0KؤA٘\Ue[.@'e S_N!ZBf^gq] Rb9?VlZ[[\r)U\/K`ϋ! FSR*jf
lqq1 ^}YRDgP( ᶂ{%_ߢ eA/Υ_ߢV_f <^ R5+7F^qQ=p.~}WDO+! .G_ yk1c }WlL!m.cv }5v3G oWqžWjr
no>fWб:m'/\C`'H. 諸Ì[qq2koܬuSj\`?4==+;}.)jn|m_yU NJ )n@ NR;j6rVg b%
Qj@{⽟kJ 4W 2q3/θAs3%ąܯ)y\Pj;6r`[&sa䪩-r}}G7r6q~Xno̥ <[MYu.ʃ:W U\Gf\O2}uo?oo|+/[{[7oo]!Zwιn qK6au,S$7q6D.ח ν[(.jgrDp
n]krjM\ q77U+ȂPW0K+.ie:KEO
KL:bpu4o
6S>l FnEca#E
`^j/ %\C7X Mʫ @g-UKtXk/c1vroBfnTkKۢ}|eθ'Hsغ 6[l^KgȬu{Y\1.ѷCi +>!n9wùxՏu R>&n6r7Qnd"{ZWWLZsSl]wν!g\"vuO9/[CoڋAs֪%p>ѓ\T5 [so1u|5w}KO|ι7ٕ[ kұ OG_^X8p<6hfJ< }-n }b =ۺڣs$F5 }-?
nZ>Iw[ys3}dqKCRuG9 WS
YrͲEiG9 vɥfZZf{ZG]}A|cY@cx~Dv~o?q{<㺭k\}cY"oNiVݴu1ix]}cB_ߝغh }cbl{7+bx~7+x*9 }#jP7dvqKJ_#w[G:Fp 5X[:8>\} "52[G;zև v_D)Q; +^KNw` oP(H`sH)_M3@|o,>I$ vyoMnc/?mMoH&7Q}EMs-UW^իzUUWTyڔ[u
TŲ
T*t
Ԧ:ljWU
| U[Bu.֭W yUbw?R_H SCǻ4 $|(VV
A§SSS+{Ӟi^uJ)T\bFՑjݭ7RSҷmMʺ@3T1HxTX|Vqf] 4XuREJ]TԺsء5j
r϶HU3uy
ɥb@ ۦƨ妪rwxOY1 Tء[Q*ph[^jNAb
#T~>c+{T>bpXEG
T
u7{ M[ǡlN w?w'{6Ug@0KSj|,Vp?Lz +C'K*}SFKSo TW)=jW_ҹޜ*=('hϬZ9w>P /oN7
ufqVuօƮ]9rz1ƦK2O~wN}̌]:2:suK7Q}.ZH4W OpM5TMWn
wJvzݪj站? 9':$dƨ)LGϪ۷ɴקɄHv&"u v/
vTԯSES'#0FdR8$㴪Q iKjRGN*.)3hϪJbX)4=b5
1SWmԻh>M٨>@Njy"X {jEjk {v uYjTN)`OdͩbuT' ljcmMUp4!J7YSrpCI;Nh v;
+jG+8$NŪNjzR1*(SԹe;fdbU81HBU3m;=MuޥֶF5A:o
{f36VcԿ*cUfUӳJ
ƥ:[zZQ
D@dեkR +ZR2RL?JX;$*NUʭ*&bu)cA+SR3F טJgKIe(yA@u^ި UP>g2r).p+V) +RY$3D̈́묂,w0f '6u%_08s;L狒;LT{ nysٶx
S6=@Y@b>*83knh4d8
2*2kСb '-{nU
tZSo+YH{5 T(Sq5w U-ؐskG(
-4'H08n.T|7D8`YDߒd8Yc ʚZ7vߩqwzYEJ-%Tf:ER%&@I 0uj=B(Aw} | +bݠ<[h6GK̛O K`< ? cQNj2Qm Pj:Q!5 ͛̆Ƃ:H
#g T;`}LlDXduaz0RMOZ 2(NݡJAt$8v}-%jE*V0hu^TTa)g?UԸ6bחd'Uf, NuJJT)s BBҟ*RMV=&IN㢐*Jv0 ʎ ]i勧Ujj9oJ˂Iš˼?Ne@ԹZ"HFj|X7`6Q#N#$b;ԻpQ#@H%.FtQF%jSW%p N6NJQ5x6E{]XUT@1FjWEīd% UFlgz*_zN`. © é6jܫVVoQcCjbEp~5zTjE +Ѫ*V ۨj_ߕ'_*#W>Ew_?[v_T]sUUW^իzU?\ IENDB` D y K y K h t t p : / / w w w . a v c c . e d u . a u / c o n t e n t . a s p ? p a g e = / n e w s / m e d i a _ r e l e a s e s / 2 0 0 5 / a v c c _ m e d i a _ 1 0 _ 0 5 . h t m D y K y K h t t p : / / w w w . a v c c . e d u . a u / d o c u m e n t s / p u b l i c a t i o n s / f a c t s / U n i v e r s i t y S t a f f P r o f i l e s _ F a c t s . p d f E D y K y K h t t p : / / w w w . d e s t . g o v . a u / N R / r d o n l y r e s / F B A 4 E 1 9 2 - 2 6 1 B - 4 7 C 8 - B A C C - 3 F 1 B 5 9 F 8 8 7 9 D / 2 4 5 6 / s t a f f 2 0 0 3 . x l s C o n t e n t s ! A 1 D y K y K l h t t p : / / w w w . d e s t . g o v . a u / a r c h i v e / h i g h e r e d / h e s / h e s 3 5 . h t m D y K y K l h t t p : / / w w w . d e s t . g o v . a u / a r c h i v e / h i g h e r e d / h e s / h e s 3 0 . p d f D y K y K R h t t p : / / m a m s . r m i t . e d u . a u / m 0 t 0 3 g q 5 u 9 w b . p d f D d o 0
# A 2 . TE0\{m\a
D r `! TE0\{m\an q / xMF_OMƛ a# EQN9A9!q]A!l% VjaጐO !R*!/@ Fbl.GsLO3ު<
! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : ; < = > ? @ A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z { | } ~ : D R o o t E n t r y F g D a t a
_( W o r d D o c u m e n t ; O b j e c t P o o l nfg _ 1 0 6 4 9 0 8 5 4 8 F nff P I C
L D a t a
M E T A
! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , . L 6 Z
-
F Microsoft Word Picture
MSWordDoc Word.Picture.8 9q Oh +'0 ( 4 D P \ p
D 9 +M @ @ w @ C w w ( w ? > ฿ ? ? ?~ ?~?? ? >8 ? ? ? ?? ?? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > > < ? <?? < ? ? ? 8 ?? ? ? 8 ?? ? ? < ??? ? <? ?? <?? x <?? p< ~ ? p< ? @0>? ? ? @ ~ ? ? `` ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ?? ? ` p ? >?? ?? ? ?? ? ??? ??? < ?? < ?? | ? ?? | ??? 0? ? ? < ? < ? ~ ? ? ' ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ? ? x ? ? ? 8 ? ? ?x8 ?? ?< ? ? ? ? ? > < ? ? > < ? ? < ?<? ?x ?x ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? < ? < < > > > ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ?< ` ? < ` ? x<` < ? ? x < ? 8 > ? > ? ? ? > >? ? xĸ> ? < > ? > ? ~ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
! C # $ % & ' ( ) + , - . / 0 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ; < = > ? @ A B E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z { | 6Z
}A @ & Word Microsoft Word r
- Times New Roman L - s Times New Roman 0 - r rp p w @ C w w ( w ? > ฿ ? ? ?~ ?~?? ? >8 ? ? ? ?? ?? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > > < ? <?? < ? ? ? 8 ?? ? ? 8 ?? ? ? < ??? ? <? ?? <?? x <?? p< ~ ? p< ? @0>? ? ? @ ~ ? ? `` ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ?? ? ` p ? >?? ?? ? ?? ? ??? ??? < ?? < ?? | ? ?? | ??? 0? ? ? < ? < ? ~ ? ? ' ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ? ? x ? ? ? 8 ? ? ?x8 ?? ?< ? ? ? ? ? > < ? ? > < ? ? < ?<? ?x ?x ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? < ? < < > > > ? > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > ? ?< ` ? < ` ? x<` < ? ? x < ? 8 > ? > ? ? ? > >? ? xĸ> ? < > ? > ? ~ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ' ' - ' - 1 T a b l e
C o m p O b j h O b j I n f o O b j e c t P o o l ff
i D @ D N o r m a l 5$ 7$ 8$ 9D H$ CJ _HmH sH tH < A@ < D e f a u l t P a r a g r a p h F o n t @V 8 @ & (
6 ? 3 "
B
S ? " q$ A, O* j @HPLJ4PLUS.NAT.NTEU \\NDPS02: HPPCL5MS HP LaserJet 4 Plus HPLJ4PLUS.NAT.NTEU @ w X X @ MSUDHP LaserJet 4 Plus < d
HPLJ4PLUS.NAT.NTEU @ w X X @ MSUDHP LaserJet 4 Plus < d
ŝ @ U n k n o w n G T i m e s N e w R o m a n 5 S y m b o l 3& A r i a l " h k!ɒZ ! x x 0 2 C r a i g W a l l e r R e c r u i t W o r d D o c u m e n t
" S u m m a r y I n f o r m a t i o n ( * D o c u m e n t S u m m a r y I n f o r m a t i o n 8 2 1 T a b l e I f 7 bjbjUU 7| 7| l 8 8 8 8 8 D 8 y \ \ \ \ \ 9 R & $ / O P " \ \ o 3 8 \ \ \ P jqW8 8 I 0 y *
j 5@CJ< UmH sH j UmH nH u N N!"""#q$$r$%
Oh +'0
4 @ L
X d l t | s s
Craig Waller o rai rai Normal.dot r Recruit 3 cr Microsoft Word 9.0 @ F# @ @ :WVp@ xqW
՜. +,0 0
p x
+ National Tertiary Education Industry Union (
Title C {Ƿ7r
8?< ݿߜb㈿{G7žZ<7oُx>d _ی=~nw_{{;2x _|o/=( p3Î;T$ -) ;<
#-_}= ~SmwC GKw9N.[xSy- ow$733O*'Ì쫿^ձ?2\ǁ{ { { {.Ob8Ka{顤Ol vPq{
m!v(ۜ8nEq[ŭ/P 8.jVnm6K2[tq7mQ_ agRsEs s|sM]" l|\`zH.0.`
EɱBĝ.ܠ"2Bi$X6f q7(MD[o7QS@#{4-{H. "(
?s!wࢡA/SAAgux=,˻BL P^e^ϥ" \H\\_ Aa'}!(0/U߰4l7,j7,0l
KV}o%}ú7(Z7(||CMYã$IA . 6u^
p:hrfQߠ6*};\L\oP`{Ӷ̗E}%%Z7$-8Qߐ6um3-
0wԗ5fr wԗhbQ_.O bۗA/'s? »Bl ]ǬkE#Jpqx/EGC/utXdP߽[$rզXtk#kؗmj.
!nWn Pkc/FܾܞPNFw('n
D w!Ʌ!)WqiknWq[Pj (9r}C.Ӫܜ5N+5V;q}6B_E/n-P+5 pH W@*z\Z_I W\W`X$ 0DDj}M+0õ5z;>CUeeОMzsyy}l@N⣫{][p
9K&@p\.OJ:&'$ډ;Njqy nNh]ƥ.'Nt,n}-yֳKOd6mr%4m+rR{ bYO2V6w`6
q}9R_&B~)/968;\iOyԹF hЗfgk4lmnɹeǒMyu'g.{1.yoK9*הNN#\`7>0.YoN_oЗGɭ5JzQuB_s- zmpB 섾"mGEe_ѕ/|>?;+,L\49̜0
, FW+ l'eHn~%wQu^3q!)dj28.I}c18+UuF4۽'UuZ tY=u8svZ9)p"Wk
S4 /Nj}MNsMӸZ_S`sӸZ_Sb
#b 5ƺ 5!0`::!0l5$pO;`{BNWƅg#;ˏg)$f8;)L_+v[CrJ;8;)ݤif
[2 %0KؤA٘\Ue[.@'e S_N!ZBf^gq] Rb9?VlZ[[\r)U\/K`ϋ! FSR*jf
lqq1 ^}YRDgP( ᶂ{%_ߢ eA/Υ_ߢV_f <^ R5+7F^qQ=p.~}WDO+! .G_ yk1c }WlL!m.cv }5v3G oWqžWjr
no>fWб:m'/\C`'H. 諸Ì[qq2koܬuSj\`?4==+;}.)jn|m_yU NJ )n@ NR;j6rVg b%
Qj@{⽟kJ 4W 2q3/θAs3%ąܯ)y\Pj;6r`[&sa䪩-r}}G7r6q~Xno̥ <[MYu.ʃ:W U\Gf\O2}uo?oo|+/[{[7oo]!Zwιn qK6au,S$7q6D.ח ν[(.jgrDp
n]krjM\ q77U+ȂPW0K+.ie:KEO
KL:bpu4o
6S>l FnEca#E
`^j/ %\C7X Mʫ @g-UKtXk/c1vroBfnTkKۢ}|eθ'Hsغ 6[l^KgȬu{Y\1.ѷCi +>!n9wùxՏu R>&n6r7Qnd"{ZWWLZsSl]wν!g\"vuO9/[CoڋAs֪%p>ѓ\T5 [so1u|5w}KO|ι7ٕ[ kұ OG_^X8p<6hfJ< }-n }b =ۺڣs$F5 }-?
nZ>Iw[ys3}dqKCRuG9 WS
YrͲEiG9 vɥfZZf{ZG]}A|cY@cx~Dv~o?q{<㺭k\}cY"oNiVݴu1ix]}cB_ߝغh }cbl{7+bx~7+x*9 }#jP7dvqKJ_#w[G:Fp 5X[:8>\} "52[G;zև v_D)Q; +@ . T i t l e $a$
5\^J > ^@ "> N o r m a l ( W e b ) d d [$\$ tH 0 20 9 7$ 8$ H$ CJ EH aJ tH . U@ A. H y p e r l i n k >*B*ph , @ R, F o o t e r
9r & )@ a& P a g e N u m b e r H P@ rH B o d y T e x t 2 dh CJ OJ QJ ^J mH sH ^ { P ^ { P S
` a 8 9 + , ) * - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 @ A N ^ _ K L W X c d e l m
# D z { / 0 t v L M U V ) * 1 2 | } C D ) ) + + $, *, 4, <, ^, _, `, a, b, i, n, o, q, v, {, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
- - - - !- "- /- 0- 1- 6- ;- <- B- C- D- I- N- O- P- Q- 2 2 < < BA CA F F aG bG mH oH H H R R rS sS S S [ [ c c 8j 9j Jj Kj j Rk Sk wk xk ep fp p p p p p p p p p p p p p q q q q q q q q !q "q 'q .q 4q :q Aq Hq Oq Pq Qq 's (s w w | | } } } } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N O t u ، - . َ ڎ T U f Θ Ϙ # $ N O X Y # ĥ ť A B o p ߨ ѩ ҩ : ; K L _ ݪ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 7 0 7 0 A 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 * 0 e 0 e 0 e 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0 @ 0
0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 E @ 0
@ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I > & - 䴡 E K K ܰ S S U U ^ ^ 3 : 9 ٱ z z ח > ۡ ۣ ڤ % . 7 ɨ ( >, , 7> <> tR xR pp vp ̞ $ J ( * 7 @ Ī ͪ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 8 * } ơ J u l i e a C : \ D o c u m e n t s a n d S e t t i n g s \ J u l i e \ M y D o c u m e n t s \ W o m e n ' s C o n f e r e n c e a n d i s s u e s \ H R E O C \ H R E O C d r a f t 3 . d o c J u l i e a C : \ D o c u m e n t s a n d S e t t i n g s \ J u l i e \ M y D o c u m e n t s \ W o m e n ' s C o n f e r e n c e a n d i s s u e s \ H R E O C \ H R E O C d r a f t 3 . d o c E m m a C u l l e C : \ D o c u m e n t s a n d S e t t i n g s \ E C u l l \ A p p l i c a t i o n D a t a \ M i c r o s o f t \ W o r d \ A u t o R e c o v e r y s a v e o f H R E O C d r a f t 3 . a s d E m m a C u l l e C : \ D o c u m e n t s a n d S e t t i n g s \ E C u l l \ A p p l i c a t i o n D a t a \ M i c r o s o f t \ W o r d \ A u t o R e c o v e r y s a v e o f H R E O C d r a f t 3 . a s d E m m a C u l l e C : \ D o c u m e n t s a n d S e t t i n g s \ E C u l l \ A p p l i c a t i o n D a t a \ M i c r o s o f t \ W o r d \ A u t o R e c o v e r y s a v e o f H R E O C d r a f t 3 . a s d E m m a C u l l e C : \ D o c u m e n t s a n d S e t t i n g s \ E C u l l \ A p p l i c a t i o n D a t a \ M i c r o s o f t \ W o r d \ A u t o R e c o v e r y s a v e o f H R E O C d r a f t 3 . a s d E m m a C u l l = P : \ P o l i c y & R e s e a r c h \ P O L I C Y \ G e n d e r \ H E R E O C 2 0 0 5 \ H R E O C d r a f t 3 . d o c J u l i e > P : \ I n d u s t r i a l \ I s s u e s \ M a t e r n i t y l e a v e \ H R E O C s u b m i s s i o n 2 0 0 5 . d o c J u l i e > P : \ I n d u s t r i a l \ I s s u e s \ M a t e r n i t y l e a v e \ H R E O C s u b m i s s i o n 2 0 0 5 . d o c J u l i e > P : \ I n d u s t r i a l \ I s s u e s \ M a t e r n i t y l e a v e \ H R E O C s u b m i s s i o n 2 0 0 5 . d o c
zB D ~ F#0~2} 2~/ P{/ 2(/ `8ƺ S!A70 Dp %EE Hd .!@e5 Re h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h p p^p`OJ QJ o( h @ @ ^@ `OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h P P^P`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h p p^p`OJ QJ o( h @ @ ^@ `OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h P P^P`OJ QJ o( ^`CJ OJ QJ o( ^`CJ OJ QJ o( o p p^p`CJ OJ QJ o( @ @ ^@ `CJ OJ QJ o( ^`CJ OJ QJ o( ^`CJ OJ QJ o( ^`CJ OJ QJ o( ^`CJ OJ QJ o( P P^P`CJ OJ QJ o( \ ^`\o( . 0 t\ t^t`\o( . p0 p^p`0o( . . @ 0 @ ^@ `0o( . . . x x^x`o( . . . . H H^H`o( . . . . .
` ^``o(
. . . . . .
P` P^P``o( . . . . . . .
^ `o( . . . . . . . . h : ^`:OJ QJ o( h ^` . h pL p^p`L . h @ @ ^@ ` . h ^` . h L ^`L . h ^` . h ^` . h PL P^P`L . h : ^`:OJ QJ o( h ^` . h pL p^p`L . h @ @ ^@ ` . h ^` . h L ^`L . h ^` . h ^` . h PL P^P`L . h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h p p^p`OJ QJ o( h @ @ ^@ `OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h P P^P`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h p p^p`OJ QJ o( h @ @ ^@ `OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h P P^P`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h p p^p`OJ QJ o( h @ @ ^@ `OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h P P^P`OJ QJ o( : ^`:OJ QJ o( ^`OJ QJ o( o ^ `OJ QJ o( ^ `OJ QJ o( x x^x`OJ QJ o( o H H^H`OJ QJ o( ^`OJ QJ o( ^`OJ QJ o( o ^`OJ QJ o( h ^` . h ^` . h pL p^p`L . h @ @ ^@ ` . h ^` . h L ^`L . h ^` . h ^` . h PL P^P`L . h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h p p^p`OJ QJ o( h @ @ ^@ `OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h P P^P`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h p p^p`OJ QJ o( h @ @ ^@ `OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( h ^`OJ QJ o( o h P P^P`OJ QJ o(
S!A D F# `8 2~/ z Re .!@e Hd %EE 2(/ P{/ D
$, *, 4, <, ^, _, `, a, b, i, n, o, q, v, {, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
- - - - !- "- /- 0- 1- 6- ;- <- B- C- D- I- N- O- p p p p p p p p p p p p q q q q q q q q !q "q 'q .q 4q :q Aq Hq Oq Pq E N . I n s t a n t F o r m a t ɋ E N . L a y o u t ʋ E N . L i b r a r i e s |͋w < E N I n s t a n t F o r m a t > < E n a b l e d > 0 < / E n a b l e d > < S c a n U n f o r m a t t e d > 1 < / S c a n U n f o r m a t t e d > < S c a n C h a n g e s > 1 < / S c a n C h a n g e s > < / E N I n s t a n t F o r m a t > S< E N L a y o u t > < S t y l e > H a r v a r d < / S t y l e > < L e f t D e l i m > { < / L e f t D e l i m > < R i g h t D e l i m > } < / R i g h t D e l i m > < F o n t N a m e > T i m e s N e w R o m a n < / F o n t N a m e > < F o n t S i z e > 1 2 < / F o n t S i z e > < R e f l i s t T i t l e > < / R e f l i s t T i t l e > < S t a r t i n g R e f n u m > 1 < / S t a r t i n g R e f n u m > < F i r s t L i n e I n d e n t > 0 < / F i r s t L i n e I n d e n t > < H a n g i n g I n d e n t > 7 2 0 < / H a n g i n g I n d e n t > < L i n e S p a c i n g > 0 < / L i n e S p a c i n g > < S p a c e A f t e r > 0 < / S p a c e A f t e r > < / E N L a y o u t > M < E N L i b r a r i e s > < L i b r a r i e s > < i t e m > p a y e q u i t y . e n l < / i t e m > < / L i b r a r i e s > < / E N L i b r a r i e s > @ @ @ @ U n k n o w n J u l i e G z T i m e s N e w R o m a n 5 S y m b o l 3& z A r i a l ?5 z C o u r i e r N e w ; W i n g d i n g s " q h t*tK2 G * < 4 p ! 20 d ɫ = 2q ~ T h e N a t i o n a l T e r t i a r y E d u c a t i o n U n i o n ( N T E U ) r e p r e s e n t s t h e p r o f e s s i o n a l a n d i n d u s t r i a l i n t e r e s t s o f 2 7 , 0 0 0 a c a d e m i c a n d g e n e r J u l i e J u l i e