ࡱ> #` Abjbj\.\. D>D,ePLWWW8XZ 8^\vc4cccdFm4 ]]]]]]]$_hJb]dd]>:c:c]:cc]]8yAc\ m[W>>>\]<8^?>"ct"c|AA "cEW42]]9^8^DE`dEzY~dY`z~ Recognising Relationships of Same-Sex Couples  TOC \o "1-5" \h \z \u  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580462" 4 Recognising relationships between same-sex couples  PAGEREF _Toc164580462 \h 1  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580463" 4.1 What is this chapter about?  PAGEREF _Toc164580463 \h 3  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580464" 4.2 Do federal laws giving financial and work-related entitlements currently recognise same-sex relationships?  PAGEREF _Toc164580464 \h 4  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580465" 4.2.1 Definitions using opposite sex exclude a same-sex partner  PAGEREF _Toc164580465 \h 5  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580466" (a) Definitions of spouse and de facto spouse using opposite sex  PAGEREF _Toc164580466 \h 5  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580467" (b) Definitions of partner using opposite sex  PAGEREF _Toc164580467 \h 6  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580468" (c) Definitions of member of a couple using opposite sex  PAGEREF _Toc164580468 \h 6  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580469" 4.2.2 Definitions using husband or wife exclude a same-sex partner  PAGEREF _Toc164580469 \h 6  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580470" (a) Definitions of spouse and de facto spouse using husband or wife  PAGEREF _Toc164580470 \h 7  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580471" (b) Definitions of marital relationship using husband or wife  PAGEREF _Toc164580471 \h 7  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580472" 4.2.3 Definitions using spouse probably exclude a same-sex partner  PAGEREF _Toc164580472 \h 7  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580473" 4.2.4 Definitions using marriage-like relationship probably exclude a same-sex partner  PAGEREF _Toc164580473 \h 8  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580474" 4.2.5 Laws where there are no definitions probably exclude a same-sex relationship  PAGEREF _Toc164580474 \h 9  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580475" 4.2.6 An interdependency relationship generally includes a same-sex relationship  PAGEREF _Toc164580475 \h 9  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580476" 4.3 Should the interdependency category of relationships be extended to all federal laws?  PAGEREF _Toc164580476 \h 10  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580477" 4.3.1 An interdependency category will give financial entitlements to people who are not in a couple  PAGEREF _Toc164580477 \h 10  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580478" 4.3.2 An interdependency relationship may impose different criteria than a couple relationship  PAGEREF _Toc164580478 \h 11  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580479" 4.3.3 An interdependency relationship mischaracterises a same-sex relationship  PAGEREF _Toc164580479 \h 11  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580480" 4.3.4 A federal interdependency category creates inconsistencies with state and territory laws  PAGEREF _Toc164580480 \h 12  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580481" 4.4 How have states and territories removed discrimination against same-sex couples?  PAGEREF _Toc164580481 \h 12  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580482" 4.4.1 NSW reforms (1999)  PAGEREF _Toc164580482 \h 13  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580483" 4.4.2 Victorian reforms (2001)  PAGEREF _Toc164580483 \h 13  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580484" 4.4.3 Queensland reforms (2002)  PAGEREF _Toc164580484 \h 14  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580485" 4.4.4 Western Australian reforms (2002-2003)  PAGEREF _Toc164580485 \h 15  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580486" 4.4.5 Northern Territory reforms (2003)  PAGEREF _Toc164580486 \h 15  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580487" 4.4.6 Tasmanian reforms (2003)  PAGEREF _Toc164580487 \h 16  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580488" 4.4.7 Australian Capital Territory reforms (2003-2004)  PAGEREF _Toc164580488 \h 16  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580489" 4.4.8 South Australian reforms (2006)  PAGEREF _Toc164580489 \h 17  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580490" 4.5 Would formal relationship recognition schemes help same-sex couples access financial and work-related entitlements?  PAGEREF _Toc164580490 \h 18  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580491" 4.5.1 Three possible models of relationship recognition  PAGEREF _Toc164580491 \h 18  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580492" (a) Relationship registration for same-sex couples  PAGEREF _Toc164580492 \h 19  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580493" (b) Civil union for same-sex couples  PAGEREF _Toc164580493 \h 19  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580494" (c) Marriage for same-sex couples  PAGEREF _Toc164580494 \h 19  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580495" 4.5.2 Formal recognition can provide evidence of a relationship  PAGEREF _Toc164580495 \h 20  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580496" 4.5.3 Formal relationship recognition is helpful but not necessary to access financial entitlements  PAGEREF _Toc164580496 \h 21  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580497" 4.6 How should federal law change to ensure same-sex couples can access financial and work-related entitlements?  PAGEREF _Toc164580497 \h 21  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580498" 4.6.1 Introduce omnibus legislation replacing discriminatory definitions in federal law  PAGEREF _Toc164580498 \h 22  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580499" (a) Preferred approach: retain current terminology and introduce the concept of a de facto relationship  PAGEREF _Toc164580499 \h 22  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580500" (b) Alternative approach: change current terminology describing married and unmarried couples  PAGEREF _Toc164580500 \h 23  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580501" 4.6.2 Introduce an inclusive definition of de facto relationship into federal law  PAGEREF _Toc164580501 \h 24  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580502" (a) Important features of the model definition  PAGEREF _Toc164580502 \h 24  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580503" (b) A model definition of de facto relationship and de facto partner  PAGEREF _Toc164580503 \h 25  HYPERLINK \l "_Toc164580504" 4.6.3 Summary of recommendations  PAGEREF _Toc164580504 \h 26  What is this chapter about? It is simple to remove discrimination against same-sex couples in laws conferring financial and work-related benefits: amend the definitions describing a couple to include same-sex and opposite-sex couples alike. The primary source of discrimination against same-sex couples in federal laws conferring financial and work-related entitlements is the way in which terms such as spouse, de facto spouse, partner, member of a couple and other similar terms are defined in legislation. These definitions routinely include an opposite-sex partner and exclude a same-sex partner. The consequence of these narrow definitions is that same-sex partners are treated differently to opposite-sex partners in a myriad of laws conferring financial and work-related entitlements. This differential treatment is contrary to one of the most fundamental principles of international law: the right to equality. Some federal legislation has introduced the concept of an interdependency relationship to allow same-sex couples access to selected entitlements which are already available to opposite-sex de facto couples. This new category of relationship has undoubtedly improved access to certain superannuation, employment and visa entitlements for some same-sex couples. But the introduction of a new category of relationship is an unnecessary and overly complicated method of removing discrimination against same-sex couples. It could end up giving financial entitlements to more people than intended. And it suggests that a same-sex relationship is unequal to an opposite-sex de facto relationship. Rather than create a new category of relationship, same-sex couples should be included in the existing category of couple relationships. Where the definition of spouse, de facto spouse, partner, or member of a couple already includes a person in an opposite-sex couple it should also include a person in a same-sex couple. There is no need to rewrite the entirety of social security, taxation, superannuation, workers compensation, aged care, migration and other legislation. But there is a need to redefine the way a relationship is recognised under that legislation. This type of reform has already occurred in all states and territories and it should now occur in the federal jurisdiction. This chapter discusses how the definitions currently used in federal law exclude same-sex couples. The chapter also considers the new interdependency relationship provisions in federal law and discusses the weaknesses of that approach in addressing discrimination against same-sex couples. The chapter summarises how all the states and territories have reformed their laws to remove discrimination against same-sex couples. It also considers how the introduction of formal relationship recognition schemes for same-sex couples may assist in accessing financial and work-related entitlements. Finally, the chapter makes recommendations about how federal law should be amended to remove discrimination against same-sex couples when accessing financial and work-related entitlements. Specifically, this chapter addresses the following questions: Do federal laws giving financial and work-related entitlements currently recognise same-sex relationships? Should the interdependency category of relationships be extended to all federal laws? How have states and territories removed discrimination against same-sex couples? Would formal relationship recognition schemes help same-sex couples access financial and work-related entitlements? How should federal law change to ensure same-sex couples can access financial and work-related entitlements? Do federal laws giving financial and work-related entitlements currently recognise same-sex relationships? There is a wide range of federal legislation which uses different definitions of spouse, de facto spouse, marital relationship, member of a couple, partner and other terms used to describe a couple. There is also a range of federal legislation which uses terms like spouse and de facto spouse in substantive provisions, but does not define those words. None of these laws recognise same-sex relationships. Superannuation and migration legislation and Australian Defence Force instructions have introduced the concept of an interdependency relationship. This new category recognises a relationship where there is an element of interdependency between two people be it between members of a same-sex couple or any other two people who rely on each other. Legislation including the interdependency relationship category will usually mean that a same-sex couple can access similar entitlements to an opposite-sex couple. But a same-sex couple is sometimes required to meet different criteria to qualify for those entitlements when compared with an opposite-sex couple. The following sections discuss the different definitions of spouse, de facto spouse, partner, member of a couple, interdependency relationship and other such terms, and how they treat a same-sex couple. The discussion is organised according to the features of the definitions which create the discrimination, rather than the terminology used. The categories are: definitions using the words opposite sex definitions using the words husband or wife definitions using the words spouse or de facto spouse definitions using the words marriage-like relationship definitions using the words interdependency relationship legislation without definitions. Definitions using opposite sex exclude a same-sex partner There are some definitions which explicitly use the words opposite sex to identify the second member of a couple. These definitions unambiguously exclude same-sex relationships. The following are examples of different definitions using these words. Definitions of spouse and de facto spouse using opposite sex Some definitions of spouse, de facto spouse and de facto relationship include a genuine relationship with a person of the opposite sex, even though the woman and man are not married. For example, the Defence Force (Home Loans Assistance) Act 1990 (Cth) defines a spouse as follows: a person of the opposite sex to the person who lives with the person as his or her spouse, on a permanent and bona fide domestic basis, although not legally married to the person. (emphasis added) The Medicare legislation defines a de facto spouse as: a person who is living with another person of the opposite sex on a bona fide domestic basis although not legally married to that other person. (emphasis added) Similarly, the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) state that two people will be in a de facto relationship if they are of the opposite sex to each other. Definitions of partner using opposite sex The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (Cth) relevantly defines a members partner as follows: a person of the opposite sex to the member in respect of whom at least one of the following applies: (b) the person is legally married to the member; (c) the person lives with the member as his or her partner on a bona fide domestic basis although not legally married to the member. (emphasis added) Definitions of member of a couple using opposite sex Social security legislation, income tax legislation and legislation conferring veterans entitlements define a partner by reference to a person who is a member of a couple. The definitions of member of a couple specify that the two people are of the opposite sex. For example, the social security legislation states that a person will be a member of a couple if a person is married, or: (b) all of the following conditions are met: (i) the person has a relationship with a person of the opposite sex (in this paragraph called the partner); (ii) the person is not legally married to the partner; (iii) the relationship between the person and the partner is, in the [decision-makers] opinion (formed as mentioned in subsections(3) and (3A)), a marriagelike relationship;  (emphasis added) The legislation goes on to set out criteria of what constitutes a marriage-like relationship (see section 4.2.4 below). Definitions using husband or wife exclude a same-sex partner Some definitions of spouse, de facto spouse and marital relationship use the words husband or wife to describe the quality of the relationship between an unmarried couple. In Gregory Brown v Commissioner of Superannuation, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal found that the terms husband and wife do not require that a couple be married. But they do require a woman and man to be involved in the relationship. Specifically, the Tribunal stated: It is unnecessary for us to determine in these proceedings whether the words husband and wife now include men and women who live together in a de facto relationship without having undergone a formal marriage ceremony. We are inclined to think that they might. If so, the meaning of the words has indeed moved on since the compilation of the Macquarie Dictionary. However, any such movement, if it has occurred, reflects changing social attitudes towards the necessity of undergoing a marriage ceremony in order to have a marital relationship. It does not, in our view, reflect any diminution of the gender connotations in these words. Definitions of spouse and de facto spouse using husband or wife Some of the definitions define a spouse or de facto spouse to include a person who is not legally married, but who lives with another person on a genuine domestic basis as husband or wife. For example, tax and superannuation legislation uses the following definition of spouse: a person who, although not legally married to the person, lives with the person on a genuine domestic basis as the persons husband or wife. (emphasis added) Some employment laws use the words husband or wife and opposite sex in the same definition of de facto spouse. For example the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) defines a de facto spouse of an employee as: a person of the opposite sex to the employee who lives with the employee as the employees husband or wife on a genuine domestic basis although not legally married to the employee. (emphasis added) It is clear that this type of definition excludes a same-sex couple by using the terms husband, wife and opposite sex to describe the relationship. Definitions of marital relationship using husband or wife Some legislation uses the term marital relationship to describe a genuine relationship between two people, whether or not they are legally married. Those definitions tend to use the words husband or wife. For example, some superannuation legislation uses the following words to describe a marital relationship: a person had a marital relationship with another person at a particular time if the person ordinarily lived with that other person as that other persons husband or wife on a permanent and bona fide domestic basis at that time. (emphasis added) Definitions using spouse probably exclude a same-sex partner Some definitions of spouse or de facto spouse include a person who is not legally married, but who lives with another person: on a genuine domestic basis as a spouse, or in a marriage-like relationship. For example, the Parliamentary Entitlements Act 1990 (Cth) defines a spouse to include: a person who is living with the member as the spouse of the member on a genuine domestic basis although not legally married to the member. (emphasis added) Although these definitions broaden the coverage of spouse to include a person who is not legally married, they are unlikely to cover a same-sex partner for several reasons. Firstly, some of the definitions explicitly exclude a same-sex partner by including the words opposite sex as well as spouse. Secondly, even where the words opposite sex are not used, case law suggests that using the word spouse or marriage-like relationship will exclude a same-sex partner. In 1998, the Federal Court held in Commonwealth of Australia v HREOC and Muller (Mullers Case) that living as a spouse meant that a couple, although not married, must be capable of becoming legally married. Since a same-sex couple cannot marry in Australia, they cannot qualify under a definition using the word spouse. The reasoning in Mullers Case is debatable because heterosexual de facto partners are recognised in numerous federal statutes even if one of them is still in a current legal marriage with another person. Such couples live as a spouse even though they are not able to marry. Further, since 1998, many state laws now define a spouse to include a same-sex partner. So, it could be argued that these developments will change the interpretation of the phrase living as a spouse. However, based on the law as it stands in Mullers Case, using spouse in any part of a definition of a couple in federal law is likely to exclude a same-sex partner. Definitions using marriage-like relationship probably exclude a same-sex partner The Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) uses the words marriage-like relationship to define a member of a couple. A person will be a member of a couple if he or she is: a person who lives with another person in a marriagelike relationship, although not legally married to the other person. (emphasis added) Again, it is arguable that a marriage-like relationship could include a genuine same-sex relationship because some state legislation now describes a same-sex and opposite-sex de facto relationship as a marriage-like relationship. However, the reasoning in Mullers Case suggests that this interpretation is unlikely to be adopted. The Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) also uses the words marriage-like relationship to help define a member of a couple. The legislation sets out a range of criteria indicating what amounts to a marriage-like relationship. While those criteria do not specifically exclude a same-sex relationship, the precursor to considering whether a person is in a marriage-like relationship is that he or she is an opposite-sex member of a couple. Laws where there are no definitions probably exclude a same-sex relationship There is some legislation which uses the term spouse without defining the term. Other legislation uses the term de facto spouse without defining that term. While each piece of legislation should be interpreted in the context of its own provisions, it is unlikely that those terms will include same-sex partnerships. This is because the approach taken in Mullers Case to the term spouse excludes a same-sex partner. Further, the terms spouse and de facto spouse are routinely defined in federal legislation in a way that excludes same-sex partners. An interdependency relationship generally includes a same-sex relationship There are three different areas of federal law which incorporate an interdependency category: superannuation (and superannuation tax) law migration law Australian Defence Force instructions relating to certain defence force personnel. In each of these three areas, the interdependency category was introduced to broaden who would qualify for the relevant entitlements and benefits. These definitions will generally include people in a same-sex relationship. They may also include people in other forms of dependency relationships for example, two elderly friends or siblings living with, and caring for, each other. Under migration law and defence force instructions, a same-sex couple seeking to qualify as an interdependency relationship must prove similar relationship characteristics as an opposite-sex couple. However, in superannuation law, the interdependency criteria shifts the focus towards a carer relationship and away from a couple relationship. This may mean that some same-sex couples will be excluded from superannuation benefits which would be available to an opposite-sex couple in the same circumstances. The definition of interdependency relationship in the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) relevantly reads as follows: 2 persons (whether or not related by family) have an interdependency relationship if: (a) they have a close personal relationship; and (b) they live together; and (c) one or each of them provides the other with financial support; and (d) one or each of them provides the other with domestic support and personal care. The various interdependency definitions are discussed in more detail in Chapter 6 on Employment, Chapter 13 on Superannuation and Chapter 15 on Migration. Should the interdependency category of relationships be extended to all federal laws? As discussed above, the few areas which give equal access to same-sex couples do so through the introduction of an interdependency category of relationships. The introduction of this category has meant that same-sex couples can now access superannuation, migration and certain defence force employment entitlements that were previously denied to them. However, the interdependency category has not brought about full equality to same-sex couples. If the goal of legislative change is to remove discrimination against same-sex couples, then there are several reasons why using an interdependency category is inappropriate. An interdependency category will give financial entitlements to people who are not in a couple Most of the legislation under discussion in this report confines rights to members of a couple. There are very few instances where financial benefits like tax, social security and workers compensation are intended to extend to a broader range of non-couple relationships. Using an interdependency relationship as a tool for including same-sex couples could have the unintended consequence of covering non-couple relationships for example friends or siblings living together and caring for each other in old age. An interdependency relationship may impose different criteria than a couple relationship In order to ensure that the interdependency relationship category does not cover too many people, legislation may (and does in the case of superannuation) impose more onerous criteria to qualify for a benefit. This does not provide equality for same-sex couples because it does not recognise them on the same terms as opposite-sex couples. It may be more difficult for a same-sex couple to qualify for the relevant entitlement than it would be for an opposite-sex couple in the same situation. An interdependency relationship mischaracterises a same-sex relationship Some gay and lesbian groups have rejected the use of interdependency to describe their relationships, because it does not characterise same-sex partners as committed and intimate couples. The interdependency term suggests that same-sex couples are different to, and lesser than, similarly situated opposite-sex couples. Put another way, it is an almost de facto relationship, or a de facto de facto relationship. This is not only insulting to the couple; it imposes an unspoken hurdle in front of a same-sex couple trying to prove the genuineness of the partnership. James Magel describes his feelings about the term interdependency as follows: This is a prime example of how federal law discriminates by only allowing the word de facto to apply to heterosexual couples. Furthermore the use of interdependent is a demeaning manner in which to acknowledge a same-sex couple that has been living together for a long time. It is a cop out because the term itself only wishes to acknowledge some interdependency instead of acknowledging that it is a bone fide relationship. Miranda Stewart argues that the term interdependency should only be used in relation to non-couples: While the notion of interdependency relationship in the superannuation law may have a place with respect to non-couple interdependent relationships, it is not an adequate mechanism for recognition of same-sex couples. A federal interdependency category creates inconsistencies with state and territory laws Using an interdependency relationship category instead of a de facto relationship category creates further inconsistencies between federal law and state and territory laws. This can create uncertainty and difficulties for same-sex couples trying to assert their right to financial and work-related entitlements in state, territory and federal jurisdictions. As discussed in the following section, all states and territories have amended their laws to ensure that same-sex and opposite-sex couples are covered in the same category of relationship be it de facto relationship, domestic relationship or significant relationship. Some states and territories have also introduced a category of relationship which captures people who are dependent on each other (interdependent) but not in a couple. Creating one category for people who are in a couple (irrespective of gender), and another category for people who are interdependent but not in a couple, is a more appropriate way to ensure equality for same-sex couples. It is also a better way to contain the scope of entitlements available to people who are not in a couple. How have states and territories removed discrimination against same-sex couples? The way to remove discrimination against same-sex couples is to include same-sex couples in the definitions which already cover opposite-sex couples. This is what occurred in state and territory laws as a result of law reforms taking place between 1999 and 2006. As described in more detail below, each state and territory enacted legislation which simultaneously amended a wide range of existing legislation (omnibus legislation). In each case, the amending legislation identified and amended (or replaced) definitions relating to de facto couples, which otherwise failed to include same-sex couples. The effect of these reforms is that, in almost all circumstances, same-sex and opposite-sex couples can access the same state and territory financial and work-related entitlements. Where differences still exist they have been noted elsewhere in this report. There is also a far higher degree of consistency in the definitions used within and between states and territories. De facto relationship and de facto partner are the most commonly used terms in state and territory law. The meaning of these terms is well understood and the courts have developed case law around borderline determinations which dates back to the 1980s. The state and territory reform process provides a useful model for federal law reform. In particular, it is worth noting that the states and territories did not add a category of interdependency to cover same-sex couples. Rather, they made sure that the definitions of de facto, domestic or significant relationships include same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples alike. NSW reforms (1999) In NSW, the Property (Relationships) Legislation Amendment Act 1999 (NSW) inserted a new definition of de facto relationship into what was the De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (NSW) (now the Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW)) and amended around 20 other pieces of legislation. These amendments introduced the terms de facto relationship and de facto partner. A de facto relationship is now defined in NSW as: a relationship between two adult persons: (a) who live together as a couple, and (b) who are not married to one another or related by family. There are also criteria setting out what will constitute a de facto relationship. As a result of these amendments, in some NSW legislation, spouse is now defined to include a party to a de facto relationship. Thus, in some circumstances, a same-sex partner will be accessing benefits available to a spouse even though the couple are not married and have no possibility of marrying under federal law. In 2000, the NSW Parliament amended its superannuation legislation to ensure equal access for same-sex couples. In 2002, the Miscellaneous Acts Amendment (Relationships) Act 2002 (NSW) amended around 25 additional laws to include same-sex couples. The NSW Law Reform Commission and NSW Anti-Discrimination Board have both identified further areas for reform. Victorian reforms (2001) In 2001, the Victorian Parliament introduced two pieces of amending legislation the Statute Law Amendment (Relationships) Act 2001 (Vic) and the Statute Law Further Amendment (Relationships) Act 2001 (Vic). Together they amended around 60 enactments, introducing the term domestic partner and replacing definitions of de facto spouse and in some instances spouse. In some legislation, the term domestic partner has been inserted as an additional definition of a relationship. A domestic partner of a person is now defined in Victorian law as: a person with whom the person is or has been in a domestic relationship. A domestic relationship means: the relationship between two people who, although not married to each other, are living or have lived together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis (irrespective of gender). There are also criteria setting out what will constitute a domestic relationship. The Statute Law Amendment (Relationships) Act 2001 (Vic) also adds a new category of relationship to certain laws for couples who do not live with each other. This category is also called domestic partner: domestic partner of a person means an adult person to whom the person is not married but with whom the person is in a relationship as a couple where one or each of them provides personal or financial commitment and support of a domestic nature for the material benefit of the other, irrespective of their genders and whether or not they are living under the same roof, but does not include a person who provides domestic support and personal care to the person (a) for fee or reward; or (b) on behalf of another person or an organisation (including a government or government agency, a body corporate or a charitable or benevolent organisation). This definition applies to health-related legislation, legislation dealing with criminal law and consumer and business legislation. The submission from the Equal Opportunity Commission of Victoria identifies further areas for reform in the future. Queensland reforms (2002) In 2002, the Discrimination Law Amendment Act 2002 (Qld) amended a wide range of existing Acts to introduce the term de facto partner as a category of spouse or to replace the term de facto spouse with de facto partner. The new definition of de facto partner (which is very similar to the NSW definition) is as follows: either 1 of 2 persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis but who are not married to each other or related by family. There are also criteria setting out what will constitute a de facto partner. Importantly, these amendments also made changes to the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld). This Act now says that any reference to a spouse in other legislation includes a de facto partner unless the particular legislation expressly states the contrary. Thus, a same-sex partner in Queensland now has access to entitlements available to a spouse. The submission from the Anti-Discrimination Commission Queensland identifies further potential areas for reform. Western Australian reforms (2002-2003) In 2002 and 2003, the Western Australian Parliament passed the Acts Amendment (Lesbian and Gay Reform) Act 2002 (WA) and the Acts Amendment (Equality of Status) Act 2003 (WA). These Acts removed discriminatory definitions from many pieces of Western Australian legislation. This was largely done through introducing the terms de facto partner and de facto relationship, for example by replacing the words de facto spouse with de facto partner. Unlike other states, the definition of de facto relationship under the Interpretation Act 1984 (WA) refers to a marriage-like relationship as follows: a relationship (other than legal marriage) between 2 persons who live together in a marriage-like relationship. A later subsection clarifies that the two persons can be of the same sex. There are also criteria setting out what will constitute a de facto relationship. In some cases, these amendments gave same-sex couples the same entitlements as a spouse, by including a de facto partner in the definition of spouse or inserting a reference to a de facto partner directly after a reference to spouse. A number of people spoke to the Inquiry about the positive impact of de facto laws in Western Australia. Northern Territory reforms (2003) In 2003, the Northern Territory Parliament enacted the Law Reform (Gender, Sexuality and De Facto Relationships) Act 2003 (NT). That legislation amended Northern Territory legislation by redefining the term de facto partner to include same-sex couples. Northern Territory law had already established a distinction between the definition of spouse (people who are married) and the definition of a de facto partner (people who are not married) so the legislative terminology did not need to change, just the scope of the definition of de facto partner. The new definition of de facto partner is similar to the definition used in WA, in that it refers to a marriage-like relationship: 2 persons are in a de facto relationship if they are not married but have a marriage-like relationship. A later subsection clarifies that the two persons can be of the same sex. There are also criteria setting out what will constitute a de facto relationship. Tasmanian reforms (2003) In 2003, the Tasmanian Parliament amended around 70 laws through the Relationships Act 2003 (Tas) and the Relationships (Consequential Amendments) Act 2003 (Tas). There are three main differences between the Tasmanian reforms and the reforms in other states and territories. Firstly, the Tasmanian legislation is the only one that uses the term significant relationship to describe an unmarried couple. Secondly, the Tasmanian reforms introduce a relationship register alongside the introduction of the term significant relationship. A couple (same-sex or opposite-sex) who registers their relationship as a significant relationship will have prima facie proof of the existence of that relationship. Thirdly, Tasmanian law does not require the couple to live together in order to prove a significant relationship. This is probably because of the registration scheme. A registered couple has prima facie proof of the existence of their relationship, so cohabitation need not be a fundamental element of proving a significant relationship. The definition of significant relationship is: a relationship between two adult persons (a) who have a relationship as a couple; and (b) who are not married to one another or related by family. There are also criteria setting out when a significant relationship exists even if the relationship has not been registered. Australian Capital Territory reforms (2003-2004) Although the ACT Parliament had already made some legislative amendments in 1994, more sweeping reforms occurred in 2003 and 2004. The Legislation (Gay, Lesbian and Transgender) Amendment Act 2003 (ACT) and the Sexuality Discrimination Legislation Amendment Act 2004 (ACT) together amended a wide range of ACT legislation. Among the amendments was the replacement of the term spouse with domestic partner. The definition of domestic partnership is very similar to the definition of de facto partnership in other states except that it explicitly includes people of the same sex. The definition reads as follows: the relationship between 2 people, whether of a different or the same sex, living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis. An earlier subsection provides that domestic partner refers to a person who lives with another person in a domestic partnership and also a spouse. There are also criteria setting out what will constitute a domestic relationship. South Australian reforms (2006) South Australia was the last state to enact reforms in the area of de facto relationships. The Statutes Amendment (Domestic Partners) Act 2006 (SA) was assented to on 14 December 2006. However, the Act had not come into force as at 10 April 2007. The legislation will amend around 90 South Australian enactments by introducing the concept of a domestic partner, which is defined as follows: A person is, on a certain date, the domestic partner of another person if he or she is, on that date, living with that person in a close personal relationship and (a) he or she (i) has so lived with that other person continuously for the period of 3 years immediately preceding that date; or (ii) has during the period of 4 years immediately preceding that date so lived with that other person for periods aggregating not less than 3 years; or (b) a child, of whom he or she and the other person are the parents, has been born (whether or not the child is still living at that date). The Act also allows for two people to apply to the Court for a declaration of domestic partnership. However, this declaration has limited impact as: [i]t must not be inferred from the fact that the Court has declared that 2 persons were domestic partners 1 of the other, on a certain date, that they were domestic partners at any prior or subsequent date. There are also criteria setting out what will constitute a domestic partnership. Would formal relationship recognition schemes help same-sex couples access financial and work-related entitlements? Many submissions to the Inquiry discuss the importance of formal recognition of same-sex relationships through registration schemes, civil unions or marriage. They also discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of the different recognition models. Recent consultations and surveys by a variety of gay and lesbian lobby groups note general support for formal relationship recognition schemes. However, there does not appear to be consensus about the most appropriate way to recognise same-sex relationships when given the choice between registration schemes, civil unions, or same-sex marriage. On the other hand, there is absolute consensus that gay and lesbian couples should have the same rights to financial and work-related entitlements as their opposite-sex counterparts. This is the primary goal of this Inquiry. The following discussion focuses on whether formal systems of relationship recognition of same-sex couples could assist those couples in accessing financial and work-related entitlements. In particular, the discussion highlights how formal relationship recognition may assist a same-sex couple to prove the existence of their relationship for the purposes of accessing financial and work-related entitlements. The Inquiry recognises that formal relationship recognition is an important issue to many people for reasons other than access to financial entitlements. The recent report of the Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby (NSW), All Love is Equal, highlights that for some people, formal relationship recognition is seen not only as a path to legal rights and equality, but as an important symbolic expression of love between two people. Several written submissions and many of the people who attended the Inquirys forums and hearings expressed a similar view. Further, while only some people in same-sex relationships wish to formalise their relationships through marriage, civil union or registration, many wish to have the option to do so, just like an opposite-sex couple. These are all valid and important arguments. However, the focus of this Inquiry is on how formal relationship recognition might help or hinder access to financial and work-related entitlements. Three possible models of relationship recognition Submissions to the Inquiry discuss three models of formal relationship recognition for same-sex couples: relationship registration schemes civil unions same-sex marriage. Of these models, only relationship registration currently exists as an option for some same-sex couples in Australia. Relationship registration for same-sex couples Registration of a relationship does not confer legal rights in itself but it may assist in demonstrating the existence of a de facto relationship. Tasmania introduced registration for significant relationships under the Relationships Act 2003 (Tas). Both same-sex and opposite-sex couples can register their relationship. Some city councils have also introduced relationship registration schemes. However, it seems that few couples have registered under these schemes. Civil union for same-sex couples Civil unions may provide greater ceremony and symbolism than relationship registration. However, there is currently no civil union scheme in Australia. The ACT government introduced legislation for civil unions in early 2006. Shortly after the Civil Unions Act 2006 (ACT) passed through the ACT Legislative Assembly, it was disallowed by the federal government pursuant to the Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 (Cth). In disallowing the legislation, the federal Attorney-General stated that the civil union scheme proposed by the ACT government was deliberately intended to make the ACT arrangements as close as possible to marriage; when the marriage power is clearly vested in the Commonwealth. On 12 December 2006, the ACT Attorney-General presented the Civil Partnerships Bill 2006 to the ACT Legislative Assembly. The new Bill is similar to the disallowed Civil Unions Act 2006 (ACT) but with modifications designed to address the concerns expressed by the federal Attorney-General. The Bill uses the term civil partnership to avoid using the language of marriage. However, the federal Attorney-General has indicated that the new Bill still does not address the federal governments concerns. There are various models of civil unions in other countries. Marriage for same-sex couples In 2004, the federal government amended the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) to clarify that marriage is the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others. Same-sex marriage is permitted in a range of other countries. However, the Marriage Amendment Act 2004 (Cth) clarified that same-sex marriages taking place overseas will not be recognised under Australian law. Marriage is clearly the most politically contentious of the three models. Many of the submissions to the Inquiry emphasised the utmost importance of giving same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples the same right to affirm their relationship in marriage. Other submissions argued that same-sex marriage: promotes different models, values and behaviours compared to opposite-sex marriage, is highly unstable, and is not in the best interests of children. Formal recognition can provide evidence of a relationship While there are many persuasive and valid reasons for introducing formal relationship recognition for same-sex couples, the focus of this Inquiry is on how formal relationship recognition could help a same-sex couple prove the right to financial entitlements. Sometimes it is difficult for a couple to provide the evidence necessary to prove the criteria for a genuine domestic relationship. This may be particularly difficult for a same-sex couple who has not yet declared their sexuality to friends, family or workplaces for fear of the public reaction. Further, some same-sex couples have told stories of decision-makers who are resistant to the possibility that a same-sex couple can be a genuine couple. Several people told the Inquiry that a formal piece of paper could assist same-sex couples in proving the genuineness of their relationship and in asserting the rights that flow from such a relationship. The NSW Law Reform Commission believes that the advantages of registration schemes include greater certainty and recognition. They comment: Registration has the benefit of certainty. That certainty removes the need for legislative preconditions such as requiring cohabitation. The parties to a relationship can be readily identified, and have demonstrated that they know about, and agree to be bound by, the legislation and its provisions. It would give people who do not wish or are legally unable to marry, such as gay and lesbian couples, the opportunity to have their relationship registered and formally recognised by the State. It also provides a system of recognition for people who do not wish to live together, but want to acknowledge their relationship of mutual support. A woman from PFLAG Brisbane told the Inquiry about how civil unions could help her gay son assert his rights under law: I want the government to relent on the issue of civil unions. It would give my son and his partner instant recognition and give them the rights that the rest of us take for granted. Doug Pollard told the Inquiry of the advantages that marriage might have brought him in proving his relationship for visa purposes: You are accepted as someones heterosexual partner if you can provide ONE piece of paper a marriage certificate. To prove our interdependency took a blizzard of paper bank statements, phone bills, rent receipts, credit card statements, letters, airline tickets, hotel and restaurant bills etc. etc. - and a major intrusion into our private life. As this example suggests, if a same-sex couple were entitled to marry, those who did in fact marry could by-pass the de facto relationship or interdependency relationship definitions and qualify automatically as a spouse. Formal relationship recognition is helpful but not necessary to access financial entitlements Almost all of the financial entitlements discussed throughout this report are available to opposite-sex couples, whether or not they are married. The goal of this Inquiry is to ensure that same-sex couples also have access to all financial entitlements, whether or not they are married. Even if there were formal relationship recognition schemes for same-sex couples, only some same-sex couples will choose to formalise their relationships. This is no different to opposite-sex couples, only some of whom choose to formalise their relationships. So, while marriage, civil unions or relationship registration might help some same-sex couples prove a genuine relationship, formal recognition is not, and should not be a necessary prerequisite. Thus, the following recommendations focus on ensuring that same-sex couples can access the same financial entitlements available to opposite-sex couples irrespective of formal recognition schemes. How should federal law change to ensure same-sex couples can access financial and work-related entitlements? The primary source of discrimination against same-sex couples is the way in which federal law describes who constitutes a legitimate couple. Same-sex couples are excluded from all definitions describing a couple-like relationship, except where the interdependency category has been introduced. While that category has brought improvements, it still treats same-sex couples differently to opposite-sex de facto couples. Discrimination will continue for as long as the definitions continue to limit their scope to opposite-sex couples. Discrimination will disappear as soon as the definitions include same-sex couples. All of the states and territories have enacted broad-based law reform to achieve this goal. They have done this by inserting new definitions of de facto, domestic or significant relationship into the relevant state and territory laws. Federal Parliament should also amend the definitions in federal laws to remove discrimination against same-sex couples. Introduce omnibus legislation replacing discriminatory definitions in federal law The Inquiry recommends that the federal Parliament enact legislation which ensures that all discriminatory definitions are amended to include same-sex couples. Such legislation should be omnibus legislation that simultaneously amends all discriminatory federal laws including those laws set out in Appendix 1 to this report. The following sets out two possible ways that this omnibus legislation could amend the laws to remove discrimination. However, the Inquiry prefers the first approach. Preferred approach: retain current terminology and introduce the concept of a de facto relationship This first option for amendment is to: retain the current terminology used in federal legislation redefine the terminology in the legislation to include same-sex couples insert new definitions of de facto relationship and de facto partner which include same-sex couples (as set out in section 4.6.2(b) below). For example, the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) currently defines a spouse as follows: spouse of a  HYPERLINK "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.html" \l "person" person includes a  HYPERLINK "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.html" \l "person" person who, although not legally married to the  HYPERLINK "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.html" \l "person" person, lives with the  HYPERLINK "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.html" \l "person" person on a genuine domestic basis as the  HYPERLINK "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.html" \l "person" person's husband or wife. (emphasis added) This definition has been interpreted to exclude same-sex couples because of the reference to a husband or wife. There is no need to change the term spouse, but it must be redefined to include a same-sex couple. A new definition of spouse could read: spouse of a  HYPERLINK "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.html" \l "person" person includes a  HYPERLINK "http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.html" \l "person" person who is in a de facto relationship. But de facto relationship must also be defined in the legislation to include a same-sex relationship. The main advantage of this strategy is that minimal changes are required to the existing legislation. For the most part, the only amendments necessary would be in the interpretation or definitions sections in the relevant legislation. For example, if this approach is adopted, the substantive provisions of the tax legislation which confer rights on a spouse need not be amended, because spouse will remain the term to describe married and unmarried couples. But the term will now also incorporate same-sex couples (and opposite-sex couples) in a de facto relationship. Appendix 1 to this report sets out the relevant sections which would need to be amended if this approach were taken. Alternative approach: change current terminology describing married and unmarried couples This alternative approach makes a clearer distinction between the way a married couple is described and an unmarried couple is described, because it amends both the terminology and the substantive provisions. This approach is in line with that taken in several states and territories. This approach involves: narrowing the scope of marriage-related terms to apply only to people who are (or were) legally married (for example spouse only includes a person who is married) introducing the terms de facto partner and de facto relationship to apply to unmarried opposite-sex and same-sex couples amending all sections conferring substantive entitlements to ensure that they include both the marriage-related terms and de facto-related terms. There will need to be many more amendments to the existing legislation if this approach is taken, because the substantive provisions relying on current terminology must be amended to recognise the new terminology. For example, some of the changes which may need to occur pursuant to this approach include: Legislation will need to add a new definition of de facto relationship. Where there is currently a definition of spouse, that term should only describe a person who is legally married; a definition of de facto partner should be inserted to cover a person who is unmarried but in a genuine relationship, irrespective of gender. Wherever there is a reference to a spouse in the substantive provisions of legislation, there should also be a reference to a de facto partner. Wherever there is a reference to a de facto spouse that term should be replaced with the term de facto partner. Wherever there is a definition of member of a couple that definition should include a person in a de facto relationship. Wherever there is a reference to a marital relationship or marriage-like relationship, de facto relationship should either replace that term or be added to that term. Wherever there is a reference to a person who lives with another person on a bona fide (or genuine) domestic basis, although not legally married to the employee, that phrase can be replaced with the phrase in a de facto relationship. These are broad guidelines only. There needs to be special care in ensuring that the amendments do not alter the nature of the entitlements described by these terms, other than to put opposite-sex and same-sex de facto relationships on the same footing. Introduce an inclusive definition of de facto relationship into federal law In developing the following definition of de facto relationship the Inquiry has considered definitions and criteria used in state and territory laws; criteria used in federal law definitions of interdependency; and the criteria for a marriage-like relationship in social security law. Important features of the model definition The Inquiry has used the term de facto because it is the most common of the terms used in state and territory law. However, the Inquiry has no strong preference for the term de facto relationship above terms such as domestic relationship or significant relationship. The Inquiry is concerned to ensure that a new definition has the following features: Inclusiveness. The focus of the definition is on the genuineness of the relationship between two people rather than their gender. Flexibility. The definition considers a range of factors relevant to a relationship with no one determinative factor. Further, the definition starts with the assumption that the couple must live together, but allows for the possibility that they may be temporarily separated. Consistency. The federal definition should be consistent with definitions in state and territory jurisdictions to reduce the uncertainty currently facing same-sex couples. Evidentiary guidelines. The definition should indicate the type of evidence that can assist a couple in proving the genuineness of the relationship, including statutory declarations and other formal recognition schemes if available. A model definition of de facto relationship and de facto partner The following is the definition of de facto relationship which the Inquiry recommends be introduced into federal laws conferring financial and work-related entitlements. (1) De facto relationship means the relationship between two people living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis. (2) In determining whether two people are in a de facto relationship, all the circumstances of the relationship must be taken into account, including any of the following: the length of their relationship how long and under what circumstances they have lived together whether there is a sexual relationship between them their degree of financial dependence or interdependence, and any arrangements for financial support, between or by them the ownership, use and acquisition of their property, including any property that they own individually their degree of mutual commitment to a shared life whether they mutually care for and support children the performance of household duties the reputation, and public aspects, of the relationship between them the existence of a statutory declaration signed by both persons stating that they regard themselves to be in a de facto relationship with the other person. (3) No one factor, or any combination of factors, under (2) is necessary to establish a de facto relationship. (4) A de facto relationship may be between two people, irrespective of gender. (5) Two people may still be in a de facto relationship if they are living apart from each other on a temporary basis. If the various states and territories adopt a relationship registration scheme (like that which exists in Tasmania), subsection (6) could be added to the definition of de facto relationship along the following lines: (6) If a relationship is registered under a state or territory law allowing for the registration of relationships, registration is proof of the relationship from that date. If the various states and territories adopt a civil union scheme, subsection (7) could be added along the following lines: (7) If two people enter into a civil union under a state or territory law, evidence of that civil union is proof of the relationship from that date. If relationship registration or civil unions become relevant to the definition, subsection (3) should change to read: (3) No one factor, or any combination of factors, under (2), (6) or (7) is necessary to establish a de facto relationship. The Inquiry further recommends the following definition of de facto partner: de facto partner means one of two people in a de facto relationship. Summary of recommendations The Inquiry recommends that the federal Parliament amend federal law to ensure equal access to financial entitlements and benefits for all couples be they married or unmarried, opposite-sex or same-sex. The federal Parliament should introduce omnibus legislation to simultaneously eliminate discrimination against same-sex couples in all federal laws identified in Appendix 1 to this report. The Inquirys preferred approach to amendments is that the omnibus legislation: retain the current terminology used in federal legislation redefine the current terminology to include same-sex couples insert a new definition of de facto relationship and de facto partner following the model definition in section 4.6.2(b) above.     Chapter 4 Recognising Relationships PAGE  Page  PAGE 1 of  NUMPAGES 32 Endnotes  Defence Force (Home Loans Assistance) Act 1990 (Cth), s 3. Examples of legislation using minor semantic variations on this definition: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 9; Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 5(1); Pooled Development Funds Act 1992 (Cth), s 4(1).  National Health Act 1953 (Cth), s 4.  Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), reg 1.15A(2). Note, however, that the Migration Regulations include same-sex couples within the definition of an interdependency relationship.  Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (Cth), s 5.  Social Security Act 1991 (Cth), s 4(2); A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999 (Cth), s 3(1); Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth), s 61.490(1)(b); Veterans Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), s 5E(2).  Gregory Brown v Commissioner of Superannuation  HYPERLINK "http://www.lexisnexis.com.wwwproxy0.nun.unsw.edu.au/au/legal/search/runRemoteLink.do?service=citation&langcountry=AU&risb=21_T1200214455&A=0.6082498136204655&linkInfo=AU%23ald%23year%251995%25page%25344%25decisiondate%251995%25vol%2538%25sel2%2538%25sel1%251995%25&bct=A" \t "_parent" (1995) 21 AAR 378. See also Re: The Roll-over Relief Claimant and Commissioner of Taxation [2006] AATA 728.  See Gregory Brown v Commissioner of Superannuation  HYPERLINK "http://www.lexisnexis.com.wwwproxy0.nun.unsw.edu.au/au/legal/search/runRemoteLink.do?service=citation&langcountry=AU&risb=21_T1200214455&A=0.6082498136204655&linkInfo=AU%23ald%23year%251995%25page%25344%25decisiondate%251995%25vol%2538%25sel2%2538%25sel1%251995%25&bct=A" \t "_parent" (1995) 21 AAR 378 at [33].  Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 6(1); Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth), s 995.1(1); Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (Cth), s 136(1). Minor semantic variations: Passenger Movement Charge Collection Act 1978 (Cth), s 3; Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth), s 10; Retirement Savings Accounts Act 1997 (Cth), s 20(2); Life Insurance Act 1995 (Cth), sch 1, s 8; Foreign Acquisition and Takeovers Regulations 1989 (Cth), reg 2; Superannuation Act 1990 (Cth), sch 1, r 1.1.1. Definition used as a subset of relative in: Financial Sector (Shareholdings) Act 1998 (Cth), sch 1, s 2; Insurance Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1991 (Cth), s 4. Other context: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 251R(2).  Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), ss 240, 263. Minor semantic variations: Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth), s 4(1); Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), sch 1, r 7(4); Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), Dictionary, pt 1.  Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth), s 8A(1); Defence Force Retirement and Death Benefits Act 1973 (Cth), s 6A(1); Governor-General Act 1974 (Cth), s 2B(2); Judges Pensions Act 1968 (Cth), s 4AB(1); Parliamentary Contributory Superannuation Act 1948 (Cth), s 4B(1).  Parliamentary Entitlements Act 1990 (Cth), s 3. Minor semantic variations: Aboriginal Land Grant (Jervis Bay Territory) Act 1986 (Cth), s 37(1); Aboriginal Councils and Associations Act 1976 (Cth), s 3; Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth), s 4(1); Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth), s 4(1).  Defence Force (Home Loans Assistance) Act 1990 (Cth), s 3; Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 9; Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 5(1); Pooled Development Funds Act 1992 (Cth), s 4(1).  Commonwealth of Australia v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission and Anor [1998] 138 FCA (27 February 1998).  A number of federal acts discussed in this paper make specific provision for exactly this situation (i.e. where there is both a de jure and a de facto spouse): see, for example, Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth), s 110; Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), sch 1, r 47; Defence Force Retirement and Death Benefits Act 1973 (Cth), s 41; Parliamentary Contributory Superannuation Act 1948 (Cth), s 21AA.  For a full discussion of the changes to state and territory laws needed to recognise same-sex couples, see J Millbank, Recognition of Lesbian and Gay Families in Australian Law Part One: Couples, Federal Law Review, vol 34, no 1, 2006, pp1-35.  Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth), s 44.11(b).  See Interpretation Act 1984 (WA), s 13A(1); Commonwealth Powers (De facto Relationships) Act 2003 (NSW), s 3(1); Commonwealth Powers (De facto Relationships) Act 2003 (Qld), s 3(1); De facto Relationships (Northern Territory Request) Act 2003 (NT), s 3A(1).  Social Security Act 1991 (Cth), s 4(2)(b)(iii).  Social Security Act 1991 (Cth), s 4(3)-(3A).  Social Security Act 1991 (Cth), s 4(2)(b)(i).  Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth); Financial Transactions Reports Act 1988 (Cth); Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth); Foreign States Immunities Act 1985 (Cth); International Organisations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963 (Cth); Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth); Higher Education Funding Act 1988 (Cth); Higher Education Support Act 2003 (Cth).  Age Discrimination Act 2004 (Cth); Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth); Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (Cth); Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth); Australian Meat and Live-Stock Industry Act 1997 (Cth); Financial Transactions Reports Act 1988 (Cth); Civil Aviation (Carriers Liability) Act 1959 (Cth).  See Minister for Revenue and the Assistant Treasurer, Fairer Treatment for Interdependent Relationships, Media Release, 27 May 2004, concerning superannuation legislation.  Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 238; Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), regs 1.09A(2), 1.09A(5)-(6); Australian Government Department of Defence, Defence Instructions (General) Personnel 53-1 (1 December 2005), issued pursuant to s 9A of the Defence Act 1903 (Cth), amended the Defence Instruction (General) Manual and the ADF Pay and Conditions Manual; Defence Act 1903 (Cth). In order to be recognised, a person must first complete a statutory declaration and attach documentary evidence from a prescribed list: see Item 9 and Annex A and B of the Instructions.  Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth), s 10A(1). The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (Cth), reg 1.04AAAA(1), sets out the criteria for satisfying this definition which, although onerous, do not specify the sex of the two people involved in the relationship.  See ACON, Sydney Hearing, 26 July 2006; Brian Greig, Perth Hearing, 9 August 2006; Law Institute of Victoria, Melbourne Hearing, 26 September 2006; Good Process, Submission 284; Miranda Stewart, Submission 266; Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group, Submission 233; Victorian Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby, Submission 256; Womens Health Victoria, Submission 318.  James Magel, Submission 245.  Miranda Stewart, Submission 266.  See for example, Roy v Sturgeon (1986) 11 NSWLR 454; Weston v Public Trustee (1986) 4 NSWLR 407. See also Australian De Facto Relationships Cases (looseleaf) (2005) 9-695.  Property Relationships Act 1984 (NSW), s 4(1). See also Anti-Discrimination Board of NSW, Submission 317.  Property Relationships Act 1984 (NSW), s 4(2).  See for example Anatomy Act 1977 (NSW), s 4(2)(d); Coroners Act 1980 (NSW), s 4(1); Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), s 3(1). See also J Millbank, Lesbian and Gay Families in Australian Law Part One: Couples, Federal Law Review, vol 34, no 1, 2006, p11.  The Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Same Sex Partners) Act 2000 (NSW) amended the Parliamentary Contributory Superannuation Act 1971 (NSW); Police Association Employees (Superannuation) Act 1969 (NSW); Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW); State Authorities Non-contributory Superannuation Act 1987 (NSW); State Authorities Superannuation Act 1987 (NSW); Superannuation Act 1916 (NSW). See J Millbank, Lesbian and Gay Families in Australian Law Part One: Couples, Federal Law Review, vol 34, no 1, 2006, p13.  Miscellaneous Acts Amendment (Relationships) Act 2002 (NSW). See J Millbank, Lesbian and Gay Families in Australian Law Part One: Couples, Federal Law Review, vol 34, no 1, 2006, p13. See also Anti-Discrimination Board of NSW, Submission 317.  NSW Law Reform Commission, Discussion Paper 44 (2002) - Review of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW), http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lrc.nsf/pages/dp44chp3#H8, viewed 1 March 2007; Anti-Discrimination Board of NSW, Submission 317.  J Millbank, Lesbian and Gay Families in Australian Law Part One: Couples, Federal Law Review, vol 34, no 1, 2006, p15. See also Attorney-General of Victoria, Submission 343; Equal Opportunity Commission of Victoria, Submission 327; Law Institute of Victoria, Submission 331; Victorian Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby, Submission 256.  Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), s 275(1).  Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), s 275(1).  Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), s 275(2).  See Statute Law Amendment (Relationships) Act 2001 (Vic), schs 4-6.  Equal Opportunity Commission of Victoria, Submission 327.  A large number of amendments also removed references to husband and wife and replaced them with spouse. See, for example, Discrimination Law Amendment Act 2002 (Qld), ss 53-57, 59. J Millbank, Lesbian and Gay Families in Australian Law Part One: Couples, Federal Law Review, vol 34, no 1, 2006, p19. See also Action Reform Change Queensland and Queensland AIDS Council, Submission 270.  Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld), s 32DA(1).  Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld), s 32DA(2).  Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld), s 32DA(6).  Anti-Discrimination Commission Queensland, Submission 264.  See for example Acts Amendment (Equality of Status) Act 2003 (WA), ss 29, 59.  Interpretation Act 1984 (WA), s 13A(1).  Interpretation Act 1984 (WA), s 13A(3).  Interpretation Act 1984 (WA), s 13A(2).  See, for example, Acts Amendment (Lesbian and Gay Reform) Act 2002 (WA), ss 69(2), 102; Acts Amendment (Equality of Status) Act 2003 (WA), ss 40, 48, 63.  See Rod Swift, Perth Hearing, 9 August 2006; Speaker, Perth Forum, 10 August 2006; Equal Opportunity Commission of Western Australia, Submission 342; Samantha and Kelly Pilgrim-Byrne, Submission 13; The Hon Penny Sharpe MLC, Submission 341; Giz Watson MLC, Submission 262.  J Millbank, Lesbian and Gay Families in Australian Law Part One: Couples, Federal Law Review, vol 34, no 1, 2006, p25.  De Facto Relationships Act 1991 (NT), s 3A(1).  De Facto Relationships Act 1991 (NT), s 3A(3).  De Facto Relationships Act 1991 (NT), s 3A(2).  J Millbank, Lesbian and Gay Families in Australian Law Part One: Couples, Federal Law Review, vol 34, no 1, 2006, p26.  Relationships Act 2003 (Tas), s 4(1).  Relationships Act 2003 (Tas), pt 2.  Relationships Act 2003 (Tas), s 4(2).  Relationships Act 2003 (Tas), s 4(1).  Relationships Act 2003 (Tas), s 4(3).  Domestic Relationships Act 1994 (ACT), s 3(1), introduced the concept of a domestic relationship in the context of property rights. The definition was intended to include same-sex couples. See J Millbank, Lesbian and Gay Families in Australian Law Part One: Couples, Federal Law Review, vol 34, no 1, 2006, pp29-30.  See for example Legislation (Gay, Lesbian and Transgender) Amendment Act 2003 (ACT), sch 1, amendments 1.23-1.25, 1.32, 1.28, 1.62, 1.55; Sexuality Discrimination Legislation Amendment Act 2004 (ACT), sch 1, amendments 1.14, 1.55, 1.63.  Legislation Act 2001 (ACT), s 169(2).  Legislation Act 2001 (ACT), s 169(1).  Legislation Act 2001 (ACT), s 169(2).  Statutes Amendment (Domestic Partners) Act 2006 (SA), s 5 will insert this definition into the Family Relationships Act 1975 (SA), s 11A. This Act had not commenced as at 5 April 2007.  Statutes Amendment (Domestic Partners) Act 2006 (SA), s 5 will insert this provision into the Family Relationships Act 1975 (SA), s 11B. This Act had not commenced as at 5 April 2007.  Statutes Amendment (Domestic Partners) Act 2006 (SA), s 5 will insert this provision into the Family Relationships Act 1975 (SA), s 11B(5). This Act had not commenced as at 5 April 2007.  Statutes Amendment (Domestic Partners) Act 2006 (SA), s 5 will insert this provision into the Family Relationships Act 1975 (SA), s 11B(3). This Act had not commenced as at 5 April 2007.  See Action Reform Change Queensland and Queensland AIDS Council, Submission 270; Associate Professor Jenni Millbank, Submission 27; Australian Coalition for Equality, Submission 228; Australian Marriage Equality, Submissions 238 and 238a; Gay and Lesbian Equality (WA), Submission 251; Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby (NSW), Submission 333; Lesbian and Gay Solidarity (Melbourne), Submission 89a; Gilbert and Tobin Centre of Public Law, Submission 179; Good Process, Submission 184; Lets Get Equal Campaign (SA), Submission 260; Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group, Submission 233a; ALSO Foundation, Submissions 307 and 307f; Victorian Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby, Submissions 233 and 233a.  For more discussion on the importance of such schemes to gay and lesbian communities and the advantages and disadvantages of each scheme, see Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby (NSW), All Love Is Equal Isnt It? The recognition of same-sex relationships under federal law, Consultation Report, February 2007; R McNair and N Thomacos, Not Yet Equal, Report of the Victorian Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby, Same Sex Relationships Survey 2005, July 2005; Gay and Lesbian Legal Rights Service, The Bride Wore Pink, Legal Recognition of our Relationships, Discussion Paper, 2nd ed, February 1994.  See Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby (NSW), All Love Is Equal Isnt It? The recognition of same-sex relationships under federal law, Consultation Report, February 2007; R McNair and N Thomacos, Not Yet Equal, Report of the Victorian Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby, Same Sex Relationships Survey 2005, July 2005; Gay and Lesbian Legal Rights Service, The Bride Wore Pink, Legal Recognition of our Relationships, Discussion Paper, 2nd ed, February 1994; K Anthony and T Drabsch, Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships, NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, Briefing Paper No. 9/06, June 2006.  See Speaker, Adelaide Forum, 28 August 2006; Speaker, Melbourne Forum, 26 September 2006; Speaker, Brisbane Forum, 10 October 2006; Lets Get Equal Campaign (SA), Adelaide Hearing, 28 August 2006; David Bocabella, Submission 4; Ralph Barrand and Douglas Collins, Submission 258.  See for example, Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby (NSW), All Love Is Equal Isnt It? The recognition of same-sex relationships under federal law, Consultation Report, February 2007; R McNair and N Thomacos, Not Yet Equal, Report of the Victorian Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby, Same Sex Relationships Survey 2005, July 2005; Gay and Lesbian Legal Rights Service, The Bride Wore Pink, Legal Recognition of our Relationships, Discussion Paper, 2nd Ed, February 1994; K Anthony and T Drabsch, Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships, NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, Briefing Paper No. 9/06, June 2006.  Relationships Act 2003 (Tas), s 11(1).  In September 2005, the City of Sydney adopted a Relationships Declaration Program. While making a relationship declaration does not confer legal rights in the way marriage does, it may be used to demonstrate the existence of a de facto relationship within the meaning of the NSW Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW) and other legislation: City of Sydney, Relationship Declaration Program Information Pack, 2005, p2. Melbourne City Council launched a Relationship Declaration Register on 2 April 2007: City of Melbourne, Relationship Declaration Register, http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/info.cfm?top=208&pg=3483, viewed 20 April 2007.  As at 1 January 2006, 57 couples had registered a significant relationship in Tasmania. Of these relationships, 45 were same-sex couples (24 gay male and 21 lesbian couples) and 12 were opposite-sex couples: J Millbank, Lesbian and Gay Families in Australian Law Part One: Couples, Federal Law Review, vol 34, no 1, 2006, p27. There is evidence of a low take up of registration regimes internationally, with a much lower take up by women, and a high urban concentration: K Anthony and T Drabsch, Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships, NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, Briefing Paper No. 9/06, June 2006, pp4-5.  Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 (Cth), s 35(2). See Commonwealth of Australia, Special Gazette No S93, 14 June 2006.  The Attorney-General, Transcript of Interview, Doorstop Interview, House of Representatives Alcove, Parliament House, Canberra, 13 June 2006, http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/WWW/MinisterRuddockHome.nsf/Page/Interview_Transcripts_2006_Transcripts_13_June_2006_-_Transcript_-_Doorstop_Interview_-_House_of_Representatives_Alcove_-_Parliament_House_-_Canberra, viewed 30 March 2007.  Chief Minister, Australian Capital Territory, Corbell Introduces Civil Partnerships Bill, Media Release, 12 December 2006, http://www.chiefminister.act.gov.au/media.asp?media=2031§ion=52&title=Media%20Release&id=52, viewed 30 March 2007. The Attorney-General,  HYPERLINK "ACT" ACT Civil Partnerships Bill does not remove concerns, Media Release, 6 February 2007. See also The Attorney-General, Transcript, ABC Local Radio Canberra, 7 February 2007, http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/WWW/MinisterRuddockHome.nsf/Page/Interview_Transcripts_2007_Transcripts_7_February_2007_-_Transcript_-_ABC_Local_Radio_Canberra, viewed 30 March 2007.  Countries with civil unions include Denmark, New Zealand and the UK: K Anthony and T Drabsch, Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships, NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, Briefing Paper No. 9/06, June 2006, pp45-48. See also Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), Submission 328.  Marriage Act 1961 (Cth), s 5(1), amended by the Marriage Amendment Act 2004 (Cth), sch 1, cl 1.  Countries with same-sex marriage include Canada, Spain, the Netherlands, and Belgium: K Anthony and T Drabsch, Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships, NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, Briefing Paper No. 9/06, 2006, p41. See also Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), Submission 328.  Marriage Act 1961 (Cth), s 88EA, amended by the Marriage Amendment Act 2004 (Cth), sch 1, cl 3.  See Anthony Brien, Submission 64a; Australian Lawyers for Human Rights, Submission 286; Australian Marriage Equality, Submissions 238 and 238a; Castan Centre for Human Rights Law, Monash University, Submission126; Frank Gomez, Submission 216; Walter Lee, Submission 250a; Russell Pollard, Submission 300; Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group, Submission 233a.  Marriage and Family Office, Catholic Archdiocese of Sydney, Submission 364.  Festival of Light Australia, Submission 31.  Festival of Light Australia, Submission 31, Marriage and Family Office, Catholic Archdiocese of Sydney, Submission 364, Lutheran Church of Australia, Submission 494; Australian Family Association, South Australian Branch, Submission 399.  NSW Law Reform Commission, Review of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW), Discussion Paper 44, 2002, para 2.73, http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lrc.nsf/pages/dp44toc, viewed 30 March 2007. See also K Anthony and T Drabsch, Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships, NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, Briefing Paper No. 9/06, June, 2006, p5.  Person A, Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays Brisbane (PFLAG), Brisbane Hearing, 11 October 2006.  Doug Pollard, Opening Statement, Melbourne Hearing, 27 September 2006.  Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth), s 995-1(1).   "#&'./0GHIJfghijkõõvgvVgvgÁ j}hEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu h#^Jjh#U^JhX h|9(hkhkh* H h|9(hGw!/! V S Y i  TA o ) o ( o ' o FEƀy;&gdt=,A       ! " # ? @ A B E F ߼߫ߠf߫ߠU jqhEUmHnHu2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphu jwhEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu! 4 5 6 P Q R S T U V W X t u v w z { ݾݾ̾ݾeݾ̾2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphu jkhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHujhEUmHnHu!   1 2 3 M N O P Q R S T U q r s t w x ±££o±£U£2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphu j_hEUmHnHu2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHuhEmHnHujhEUmHnHu jehEUmHnHu! 7 8 9 S T U V W X Y Z [ w x y z ±££o±£U2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphu jShEUmHnHu2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu jYhEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!z } ~     G H I c d e f g h i j k յƢnƢ jG hEUmHnHu2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHu$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu jMhEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH uhlIhE0J*mHnHu" ijkŴũӴŀfŴũUӴ j; hEUmHnHu2j hEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHu jA hEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH uhlIhE0J*mHnHu$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu2j hEhE>*B*UmHnHphu! !">?@AFGZ[λ񟐟eZ񟐟h40J*mHnHu2j hEhE>*B*UmHnHphu j5 hEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu2j hEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu123MNOQRSTUVrstuz{±££o±£U£2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphu j)hEUmHnHu2j hEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHuhEmHnHujhEUmHnHu j/ hEUmHnHu!$%±££o±£U2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphu jhEUmHnHu2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu j#hEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!/01345678TUVW\]յƢnƢ jhEUmHnHu2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHu$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu jhEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH uhlIhE0J*mHnHu"6r0nJn_,V RA o ( o ) o OPQklmopqrstŴũӴŀfŴũUӴ jhEUmHnHu2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHu j hEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH uhlIhE0J*mHnHu$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphu! )*+-./012NOPQVWpqrλ񟐟e񟐟T jhEUmHnHu2j|hEhE>*B*UmHnHphu jhEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu2jhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu !"#$)*KLMgݾݾ̾ݾeݾ̾2jphEhE>*B*UmHnHphu jhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu2jvhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHujhEUmHnHu!ghiklmnop'±££o±£U£2jdhEhE>*B*UmHnHphu jhEUmHnHu2jjhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHuhEmHnHujhEUmHnHu jhEUmHnHu!'()CDEGHIJKLhijkpq±££o±£U2jXhEhE>*B*UmHnHphu jhEUmHnHu2j^hEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu jhEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!KLMghiklmnopյƢnƢ jhEUmHnHu2jRhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHu$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu jhEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH uhlIhE0J*mHnHu"   <=>XYZ\]^_`a}~ŴũӴŀfŴũUӴ jhEUmHnHu2jFhEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHu jhEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH uhlIhE0J*mHnHu$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu2jLhEhE>*B*UmHnHphu!   %&')*+,-.JKLMRSλ񟐟e񟐟T j hEUmHnHu2j: hEhE>*B*UmHnHphu jhEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu2j@hEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu 345OPQSTUVWXtuvwz{ݾݾ̾ݾeݾ̾2j."hEhE>*B*UmHnHphu j!hEUmHnHuhEmHnHu2j4!hEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHujhEUmHnHu!    ()*+01/±££o±£U£2j"$hEhE>*B*UmHnHphu j#hEUmHnHu2j(#hEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHuhEmHnHujhEUmHnHu j"hEUmHnHu!/01KLMOPQRSTpqrsvw±££ud±£ j%hEUmHnHuhS0J*mHnHu2j%hEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu j$hEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!ghiŴũӴŀfŴũUӴ j'hEUmHnHu2j'hEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHu j&hEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH uhlIhE0J*mHnHu$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu2j&hEhE>*B*UmHnHphu! !efgλ񟐟eZ񟐟h* H0J*mHnHu2j)hEhE>*B*UmHnHphu j(hEUmHnHujhEUmHnHuhEmHnHu!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHu2j (hEhE>*B*UmHnHphuhEmHnHuhlIhE0J*mHnHu   / 0 1 d ±ztztztkb\bVbPbPbP hX^J h$c^J hE^JhhGw^Jhh5^J ht^J hA!^J h5^J h3^J hh2Y hhGwh|9(hhX^Jjh#U^J!hEOJQJaJmHnHtH u$jhlIhE0J*UmHnHuhEmHnHujhEUmHnHu j)hEUmHnHu  T!U!""%%'' ( (0)1)_*`*+gd[FEƀy;&.gd[gdOB !7!Q!S!T!U!n!u!!!!""?"C"|"""""##'#9#####$;$K$$$$$G%%%%%%%%%&&)&1&I&ʾʾ崺ʤĤ夞垒垌Č h5^J h:V^J hW-^J h"^J h/ ^J hGZ^JhW- h4M^Jh4M h*u^J hE^J hhCF^Jhhr#^J hGw^J hM^J h$c^J hW_^J hX^JhhGw^J4I&J&m&u&v&w&&&&&&&&&''(( ( (()(S(l(n((((((((()/)G)L)T)p)))))))**!*g*h*****+++1+h3 hB ^Jh3 hX^Jhhb^J hk(^J h4M^J hB ^J h2^J hr#^Jhhr#^J hW_^J hE^J hJ7^J h"^J h5^J hK^J9++\++,RS & FxEƀy;&^`gd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd-Hgd[1+@+B+[+\+++++,,--Q-R-b-s-----------....-.A.B.Z.[.b.c...................»h ; h'h`,h'h`, h'hq(hhq(^J hhGwhxV hhq(h hW_h[h"y h"hGZ h4%^Jh3 h3 ^Jh3 h_^J hE^Jh3 hb^J7,p,,WS & FxEƀy;&^`gd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd[,Q-R---.///e/f/1`[VgdAgd[FEƀy;&.gd[gd;QS & FxEƀy;&^`gd[ ..... ///+/,/-///6/9/:/=/B/e/f/g/t/x///////////////00S0g0h0i00000 11h111111122#2<2F2O2ÿ÷ hX^J hO^J h8O^J hq(^J hhq(h=)hRihAh(, h ; h ; hW_h8 h'hPlhK1hW-hr@h`,h ; hE h'hq(h'<1222v333RS & FxEƀy;&^`gdAS & FxEƀy;&^`gd-Hgd[O2V2x22222222222222223@3u3v3w333333334 4 4 4%4B4C4D4m4o4~444444444ľĵͣĝĬċhyRh"yhh8O^Jhphp^J hE^Jhph_AL^JhphN^Jhphs H^J hA^JhphO^Jhph:V^J hRi^J h(,^J h"y^J hO^J h8^J h8O^J hX^J03 4C4WS & FxEƀy;&^`gd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd[C4~444WRgd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd[444444444444 5!5c555555666666:6<6N6R6b6j6q6r666ýõíҞÊÊ~ul`hChS6]^JhChS^JhCh^J h^J h|^J hyR^J h^Jh:Vh%hhmh^JaJh^JaJhS^JaJ hs H^J hS^JhCh^J h^J hv@^J hbhGZh"yh hEhyRh hg hbhb#44455556666C7nFEƀy;&()gdK1gd[FEƀy;&..gd[ 666666677#7$7*7+7-7.7175777A7B7C7D7L7R7ɽulubUHhXhmCJ^JaJhChmCJ^JaJh CJ^JaJhX]^JaJh4dhm]^JaJh]hm]^JaJhm]^JaJhW-]^JaJh]^JaJhThm]^JaJhm6^JaJh4dhm6^JaJh4dhm^JaJhm^JaJ hS^JhChS^JhChS6]^Jh:V6]^JR7`7m777777777 8 8A8C8D8u8888888888ɻ֨~n~`P~IAh vo^JaJ h.yh vohCh vo6CJ]^JaJhXh voCJ]^JaJhph vo6CJ]^JaJhCh voCJ^JaJhCh vo^J h vo^Jh voh voCJ^JaJ%jhCh vo0JCCJU^JaJhXhmCJ]^JaJh`*hmCJ^JaJhChmCJ^JaJhXhmCJ^JaJh`*hm6CJ]^JaJC7 8 8C8889999#::::|q x^gd;Q^gd;Q!x[$\$^gd-H$gd[FEƀy;&()gdK1p^pgd[gd[gd;Q x^gd-H 899S999999999999: : ::::!:":#:3:?:::B;C;T;U;V;; ="==żŏwdłw%jhSh vo0JCCJU^JaJh;Qh voCJaJhSh voCJ^JaJhph vo6CJ]^JaJ h vo^JhSh vo6^JhSh vo^Jh vohh vo^Jh voCJ^JaJ%jh.yh vo0JCCJU^JaJh.yh vo^JaJh vo^JaJh h vo^JaJ$:U;V;;;<< ="=P===>>5?6? x^gd* H x^gdh x^gd-HFEƀy;&()gdK1gd[ x^gd;Q====>>>>>>?'?)?2?u?v???????,@/@6@=@>@]@^@_@稡vfvfWKh vo0J0^JmH sH hEhE0J0^JmH sH hwh vo0J06^JmH sH h vo0J06^JmH sH h vo^JaJ h vo^Jhsh vo^J hk(hk( hk(h voh vo(jh;Qh vo0JCCJU]^JaJh;Qh vo6CJaJh;Qh voCJ]aJh;Qh voCJ\]aJh;Qh voCJaJh;Qh vo6CJ]aJ6?u?v?+@,@BACC D DDc]]$gd[FEƀy;&()gdK1 x^gd-Hgd[FEƀy;&..gd[ _@@@@@@@@@@@@ AA+ABApAAAAAABBOCdCCCCC D Dֶtg^ZS hF"h voh vohsh vo^Jhwh voCJ^JaJ%jhwh vo0JCCJU^JaJ$hwh vo0J2CJ^JaJmH sH h*!CJ^JaJmH sH h voCJ^JaJmH sH hwh voCJ^JaJmH sH jhwh vo0JCU^Jh vo^JaJhwh vo^JaJhwh vo^JmH sH h vo^JmH sH  DDDDDD(E*E+EzEEEEEEEEEEEE F FFF(FOFkFqFFFFFFδ΃tltltl`UlUh[h vo^JaJh[h vo6^JaJh vo^JaJhD1h vo^JaJh vo%jhCh vo0JCCJU^JaJhh vo6CJ]^JaJhUTh voCJ]^JaJhUTh voCJ^JaJhh voCJ^JaJhCh voCJ^JaJh voCJ^JaJ h vo^JhCh vo6]^JhCh vo^J!DD*EEEFhGiGHHBHCHIIIwJxJgdk(FEƀy;&()gdK1gd;Q x^gd-Hgd[FFFFFFF G'GLGUGVGgGhGiGHBHCHHHTHbHcHwHyHH I I~III̫̾֠wqdTh@0Hh vo6CJ\^JaJheNh voCJ^JaJ hA^Jh@0Hh vo6^JaJhh vo^JaJ h vo^Jh voh vo^JaJh#!bh vo^JaJ%jhCh vo0JCCJU^JaJhzkh vo6CJ^JaJh voCJ^JaJhCh voCJ^JaJhUh vo6CJ]^JaJhAh voCJ^JaJIIIJJJ(J8JEJFJbJcJdJwJxJJJJJJJJ8K:K\KbKcKKKKKK׺ʪחʍxoooocoo[Rh vo]^JaJh vo^JaJhCh vo6]^JhCh vo^Jh#!bh vo^JaJh vo h vo^Jh voCJ^JaJ%jh4.h vo0JCCJU^JaJheNh vo6CJ]^JaJh@h vo6CJ]^JaJh4.h voCJ^JaJheNh voCJ^JaJh4dh voCJ^JaJh4dh voCJ\^JaJxJJJ:KhK`S & FxEƀy;&^`gd-Hgd[FEƀy;&..gd[hKKKKLL1M2MMMcNdNOOPPQgd;Q x^gd-Hgdk(gd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd[KKKKKLLoLpLLLLMMMMMMMbNcNdNkNlNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNO5Oݰݪ~wswkfkskfswswswsws h vo6hh vo6h vo hh vohmh vo^JaJ jhhE0JCU]^JhB^JaJhrr^JaJ h vo^J%jhCh vo0JCCJU^JaJh`*h vo6CJ]^JaJh voCJ^JaJhCh voCJ^JaJh vo^JaJh4dh vo6]^JaJ'5O6OOOOOOOOOOlPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPQQ QQQQQQ|QQQQQQQQQQQQQQRR'R)R2R9RZUU$ & F xEƀy;&^`gd-HU$ & F xEƀy;&^`gd-H>ZZZ\^^^^'_D____}`~` x^gdh x^gd-Hgd[U$ & F xEƀy;&^`gd-H^^^^^______*`C`_`d`{`|`~``````Za[a\auaxayaaaaaHbIbXbYbbbc"c#c2c3c4cNcPcccdcecnccc견 hM+h vo hrr^J hQ^JhAh vo h4%^J hA^J h vo^Jh voCJ^J%jh;Qh vo0JCCJU^JaJh;Qh vo5CJ\]aJh;Qh voCJ\]aJh;Qh voCJaJhh voCJ^J4~```xayabbOcPcccdiddgdhFEƀy;&..gdAgdAgd[FEƀy;&.gdA cddddddeHeSe`eceveeeeeeeffBfCfffmgnggghhhhShThUhwhhhhhhhhiiii0i|iiiiijиגhCh vo6^JhCh vo6]h7+h vo\h7+h vo5\ jh7+h vo0JCU]^J h7+hQ h7+h vo h vo]^JhA h{TFh voh(:hQhrr hM+h voh vo6ddeeffffhhShThnigd[FEƀy;&..gd[FEƀy;&..gd[gdh Thiiiijjjlllmm8n9nooFEƀy;&..gdA $Bx^Bgd-H$gd[ Bx^Bgd-Hgd[gdhgdAj"jjjjj2k8k9kAkBk}k~kkkllllllllllllmmmmmmmn>nnnȼȼȼȼȼȼțȑ|j|ff_ h h vohA#jh vo0JCCJUaJnH tH h.h vo\]^Jh vo\]^Jh vo5\]^J)jh.h vo0JCCJUaJnH tH h voCJaJnH tH hACJaJnH tH h.h voCJaJnH tH hCzh voCJaJnH tH h vo hCzh vo h vo]^J hy]^J%nnnph voh/hyhrrjh vo0JCU^J hk5qh vo h"h voh"h vo^JhU hy^J h/^J hQ^J hh vohh vo6]^JhI5h vo6]^J h&u^J h vo^Jh vo hM+h vo h h vo.oppbqcqrrrrttZu[u]v^vwSyTy$gd[gd/FEƀy;&.gd[gd[gdhTygyhyzz{;{c{{{{{?}@};~<~~~^gd[ x^gd-Hgd[$gd[FEƀy;&..gd[Tygytyyyz(zIz{{{{{{=}>}}}89~~~~;<=>?au%jhhh vo0JCCJU^JaJhhh voCJaJ hu+^Jh-h vo6]^J h vo6^Jh\dh vo6]^Jh vo6]^Jjh vo0JCU^Jjh vo0JCCJU^JaJhZZkh voCJ^JaJhwsh vo6]^J h vo^Jh vo(~~~?@ajk;% 2( Px 4 #\'*.25@9x^gd&ugdh x^gdhgd[FEƀy;&..gd[ aghô܂;<LMNSs؃ك89mnτЄ¶¬¦—q`R`R`R`R`R`R`R`Rh voCJ^JaJnH tH h;"+h voCJ^JaJnH tH &h;"+h vo5CJ\^JaJnH tH #h;"+h voCJ\^JaJnH tH h voCJ\^JaJnH tH hy^Jh;"+h vo6^Jjh vo0JCU^J h vo^Jjh vo0JCCJU^JaJh voCJ^JaJh[!h voCJ^JaJ h[!h voCJ^JaJnH tH Є8X}~ÅąŅۆ܆' D`o JǻDzǢǻǕǻ~~tnǻǮ h/^Jh0h vo6] hUh vojh vo0JCCJU^JaJh$`h voCJ^JaJh0h vo6]^Jh voh0h vo^Jjh vo0JCU^J h vo^J'jh vo0JCCJU^JaJnH tH h voCJ^JaJnH tH h;"+h voCJ^JaJnH tH *; %ŅƅJKۆ܆' o x^gd-HFEƀy;&..gd[gd[ 7$8$H$^gd[x7$8$H$^gd-Hop Ќьlݍލ)*uv Bx^Bgd-H$gd[FEƀy;&..gd[gd/gd[JKkz{~ŋΌό1lۍ܍ݍ'(}~ώюَڎstݏޏߏ;~ܳܗ|uqehh vo6]^Jh vo h%h vohch vo5\^Jjhch vo0JCU^Jhch vo^J%jhSeh vo0JCCJU^JaJhSeh voCJ^JaJhwTh vo6^Jjh vo0JCU^J hu+^J h vo^Jhh2h vo^Jh vo6]^Jhh2h vo6]^J%56%&rsɓʓ x^gd%4 gd[$gd[FEƀy;&..gd[gdh '3Ibd}őܑ̑ؑ234"#$%&opƓǓʓ)?N}~ʖ͖5]hw(h voCJ^JaJh@h vo6]^Jhw(h vo6]^Jhhh vo^Jh vo h/^J%jhhh vo0JCCJU^JaJhhh voCJaJjh vo0JCU^J hu+^J h vo^Jhh vo^J6ʓ5`̘͘Mgd/^gd[ x^gd-Hgd[FEƀy;&..gd[]_ʘ˘̘!JKLN GVɛʛ@Astuʜޜ abeидиШШиТЕ|vиидkhC(h vo^JaJ h*!{^J hV^J%jhro6h vo0JCCJU^JaJhro6h voCJ^JaJ h+^Jhro6h vo6]^Jh vojh vo0JCU^J hy^J hm,^J h vo^J%jhw(h vo0JCCJU^JaJhw(h voCJ^JaJh voCJ^JaJ*MNuvde x^gd-H$gd[FEƀy;&..gd[gd[ e}~ß6Π[\¢â} Bx^Bgd-Hgd1[ x^gdoK x^gdh[z x^gd-Hgd[$gd[FEƀy;&..gd[=>a|}JK'YZ[\yfYLAhIjh vo^JaJhIjh voCJ^JaJhIjhCCJ^JaJ%jhIjhC0JCCJU^JaJhIjhu+CJ^JaJhCCJ^JaJhoKCJ^JaJhu+CJ^JaJ hu+^J h*Z^J h vo^JhC(h vo^JaJh*Z^JaJ hhh*Z hhhu+ hhh voh(h voB*^JaJph#hC(h vo6B*]^JaJphȡɡۡޡߡ¢[\ۣ,-hi̦ͦЦ%&gi=㻨~uoodhYh vo0JC^J hC^JhCh vo^J hA^Jjh vo0JCUhCh vojh vo0JCU^J h vo^J%jhIjh vo0JCCJU^JaJhIjh voCJ^JaJhIjh1[^JaJh1[^JaJh*!^JaJhIjh vo^JaJ!jhIjh vo0JCU^JaJ$â̦ͦghjk-.$gd[FEƀy;&.gd[ [$\$gd[gd[=?PRDgh.`34GHIEF¯Pklm} ˽ҵҧܒҧwhy@h vo6]^Jhy@h vo^J h*!^J h(h vojh vo0JCU\^J h vo\^J h@h voh@h vo6h)yh vo\^JhC h)yh voh vo hC^Jjh vo0JCU^J h vo^Jh h vo6]^J h ^J..`aʬWS & F xEƀy;&^`gdRt pgdRtgd[FEƀy;&..gd[ WRRRgd[S & F xEƀy;&^`gdRtS & F xEƀy;&^`gdRtHIHINOiFEƀy;&()gdK1gd1[gd[FEƀy;&()gdK1 /0gmnoqȲ0E*.=´ôŴ"(8¯wkwh#h vo6]^Jh#h vo^Jh vo he^Jjhy@h vo0JCU^J hC^Jhy@h vo6^J hA^J%jhy@h vo0JCU^JmH sH hy@h vo^JmH sH h vo^JmH sH jh vo0JCU^Jhy@h vo6]^Jhy@h vo^J h vo^J(OpqĴŴ]^-. ,p@ P !$`'gd[FEƀy;&()gdK1gdAgd[8CEFGeƵǵյ[\^\]p|)*+,õèõʜ卆mammhC^JaJnH tH )jhh vo0JCU^JaJnH tH h vo hTh vohh vo^JaJnH tH jh vo0JCU^Jh Yh vo6\]^Jjh vo0JCU\^J h vo\^J h vo^J)jh9h vo0JCU^JaJnH tH h vo^JaJnH tH h9h vo^JaJnH tH #,-.jVûƻ >?@AṀnb\V h@W^J hh[z^Jh voCJaJnH tH 0jh vo0JCB*CJU^JaJnH phtH hTh voCJaJnH tH hh voCJaJnH tH jh vo0JCCJU^JaJhh voCJH*aJhh voCJaJh vonH tH h1[^J hC^Jh vo h vo^J)hTh voB*OJQJaJnH phtH .hjno01@A 7$8$H$gd[gd@W x^gd-Hgd1[gd[FEƀy;&..gd[$%&l$?Sg6VWX¼“²}ttthYh vo^J hh[z^J h8^J h^JhC hh vohCh ^JhCh vo^J hS^J h vo^Jh h ^Jh vo$jh vo0JCB*CJUaJphhohh voB*CJaJph.hohh voB*CJaJfHphq -&' klVWgd FEƀy;&..gd[gd[ 7$8$H$^gd[45efhFEƀy;&..gd[$gd[gd[FEƀy;&.gd[ f14@'[`z:ahiv~3GNOPa뼸礘뤍hh[zh voCJaJh|{8h vo6]^Jh|{8h vo^Jh3 hS?hChC hS?h vohch vo^J hS^JhMEh vo^J h3^J hh[z^Jh vo h vo^JhYhC^J hC^J4:v[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd[FEƀy;&()gdK1gdSgd[vOPjWRMB x^gd-Hgd[gdh[zS & FxEƀy;&^`gd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd[!"()56/067HI<=CDVWXYjk{°°zmga h`^J hQV^JhQVhRtCJ^JaJhh[zh|{8CJaJ%jhh[zh vo0JCCJU^JaJ.hh[zh vo0J*6>*B*CJ]^JaJph#jhh[zh vo6CJU]aJhh[zh vo6CJ]aJ(hh[zh vo0J*>*B*CJ^JaJphhh[zh voCJaJjhh[zh voCJUaJ&jkm34FEƀy;&()gdK1gd3gdh[z x^gd-Hgd[!x[$\$^gdRtCDJUgm{|WX^_c34>DzDzب}}yphSh^Jh0 h8^J h0^Jh8hT^J hm~^J h!O^J h3^JhThTCJ^JaJ(hQVhT0J*>*B*CJ^JaJph!jhQVhTCJU^JaJhQVhTCJ^JaJhH,hH,^J hT^J hH,^J hQV^J+>F$,. "19;HIQ_ ACGnƢƜƂƋhSh0^J h^J hS?h h h8r^J h`[^J hjU^J hC^J h ^J h3^J hJ^J h0^J hB\^J hF(^J h^Jhr hShh0h{Ph{P^JhSh{P^J2"#;^FS & FxEƀy;&^`gd[U$ & FxEƀy;&^`gd[$gd8rgd[gd3^$nMS & FxEƀy;&^`gd8rgd8rgd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd[0orsxy1Ri 89ŷů❗⋅}yphBrh%"^Jhh >h<h#d h ^J hGx}^J h?x^J h8r^J hjU^J h`^J hY^Jh`w^JaJh`wh`w6]^JaJh`wh`w^JaJ h6L>^J h|^J h?^J h[P(^J h(:^J h^J h0^J hi.^J+nrWS & FxEƀy;&^`gd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd(:zWS & FxEƀy;&^`gd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd[_ZUZgd8rgd[K & FxEƀy;&gd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd[23GHidgdGFEƀy;&()gdK1gdT~gd[FEƀy;&..gd[ @LY^y{2EHKWpv*+/;Xx23<@qϷϷÙÙÙh/h/^Jh/h%"5\^J hBr^J h|^JhmChBr^Jh/5\^Jh/h/5\^J h/^J hG^J h%"^J h?>^J hL^JhL hT~^J hjU^JhBrh%"^J h/1^J23_S & F xEƀy;&^`gd-HK & FxEƀy;&gd-Hr} J\g;>12dj>?B_bŽ{pi hH,6]h9hv6\] h2.6]h9hv6]hThv6] h?>6]hmChv6] hv6] hh hh hYhlhh h(chL hFX^J h%"^J hjU^JhjUh/5^Jh/h/5\^J h/^Jh/h%"^J)3WRgd[S & F xEƀy;&^`gd-HS & F xEƀy;&^`gd-H:;ES & F\xEƀy;&()^\`gdh[z^gdh[z x^gdh[z$gd$gd[FEƀy;&()gdK1H}WS & F\xEƀy;&()^\`gdh[zS & F\xEƀy;&()^\`gdh[z}_WS & F\xEƀy;&()^\`gdh[zS & F\xEƀy;&()^\`gdh[z_WS & F\xEƀy;&()^\`gdh[zS & F\xEƀy;&()^\`gdh[z2WS & F\xEƀy;& ()^\`gdh[zS & F\xEƀy;&()^\`gdh[z2>? ^gd[gdh[z^gdh[zS & F\xEƀy;& ()^\`gdh[zbjt2AT`fmy{ S 8=uпплvjvjvvjvjvhmChh6]^Jhh6]^J hh[zhh hh[zhL hh[zhvhh0J^Jhv0J^JhmChv0J^JhAhA:hCDhvhhhh6] hh6]hhhHC6] hHC6] hv6] h2.6] hq6]hmChv6])@Vb,-./:;HIJKO͵뮪}wnhBrhP^J h#d^Jhrh JNh["Xh#dhvhh(c6]h-th(c6 haVh(ch(c hh[zh(chmChCD6]^JhThCD6]^JhCD6]^J hCD^JhmChjU^J hjU^JhmChh^J hL^J hh^J)./JK*gdA$gd[FEƀy;&..gd[^gd-tgdh[z^gd[gd[Ost%&07Zi*QXYfnqs )*+,-/023568Q^ÿôôôôʬhb'hYCJOJQJhYCJOJQJhm0zjhm0zUh#dh voh["XhP hS?hjUhjU hS?hP hbJ^J hA^J hjU^J h["X^JhBrh#d^JhBrhP^J h$j^J hP^J1*fWS & FxEƀy;&^`gd[S & FxEƀy;&^`gd[)*,./124578^_`i ,&`#$gd{.$a$gdb'.$a$gd0 >gd[S & FxEƀy;& ^`gd[^_`aghikpqwxyz~%ععǝrg[gPh7+hYCJ^JhjUhY6CJ^JhjUhYCJ^J!jhjUhY0JCCJU^Jh vohY5\^JaJhYCJ^Jhm0zh{hY0J-OJQJhf0J-OJQJmHnHujhY0J-OJQJU!jh:VhY0J-OJQJUh:VhY0J-OJQJ hY0J-jhY0J-UhY h{hYijkwMBgdgd81rgd#Bgd=BgdW- ![$\$gdeBgdSBgdyRBgdgd ,&`#$gd:V,h]hgd%:GZjwxy<Tnosгzzj]h7+hY^JmH sH h7+hY0J06^JmH sH h7+hYCJ]^JaJh7+hY6CJ^JaJh7+hY6CJ]^JaJh7+hYCJ^JaJ%jh7+hY0JCCJU^JaJh7+hY6^Jh7+hY^Jjh7+hY0JCU^Jh7+hYCJ^Jh7+hY6CJ^J!<LMNS+R*A/^yᵦᵅ~tktktktktktktktktktkh7+hYCJh7+hY6CJ h7+hY!jh7+hY0JCCJU^Jh7+hY0J06^JmH sH jh7+hY0JCU^Jh7+hY^Jh7+hY6^JmH sH (h7+hY0J*>*B*^JmH phsH h7+hY^JmH sH !jh7+hYU^JmH sH *y!"#Pgy*DV,Yf'4GWxɽɽɵɽɽɦɽɽɽɽɽɽɽɽɽɽɦh7+hY6^Jh7+hY^Jjh7+hY0JCU^JhYCJ^Jh7+hY6CJ^Jh7+hYCJ^J!jh7+hY0JCCJU^J h7+hYh7+hYCJh7+hY6CJ7'W   vfBgd{5~Bgd["XgdfvBgdP BgdG*Bgd&BBgdzBgd?BBgd(MgdgdEgdmP^j|%5jz'()AWXY{CKem 6 > \ d       h7+hY6]^Jjh7+hY0JCU^Jh7+hY6^Jh7+hY^J hY^JP   7 h       < i         H L     b c e r  ;<fgvw秜ysss hY^JhY0JCJ^Jh7+hY0JCJ^Jh7+hY6CJ^Jh7+hYCJ^J!jh7+hY0JCCJU^Jh7+hY\^Jh7+hY6^Jh7+hY6^JmH sH h7+hY^JmH sH h7+hY^Jjh7+hY0JCU^J-fgh&8JYoJ\AIrz  綯瞔h7+hY6^Jh7+hY\^J jh7+hY0JCU\^J h9t]^Jh7+hY]^Jh7+hY6]^Jh7+hY^JmH sH h7+hY6^JmH sH h7+hY^Jjh7+hY0JCU^J6  Q^/Sers|STUVk}~ᴪ᪝Ⴊ jh7+hY0JCU\^Jh7+hY6^J h9t\^J h9t^Jh7+hY\^Jh7+hY6\^J h9t]^Jjh7+hY0JCU^Jh7+hY0JC^Jh7+hY^Jh7+hY]^Jh7+hY6]^J3T}QAr)S}, <BgdBgd$`Bgd$>3BgdF Bgd)B47QR\n{|/@ABC_rs)*+BJKSTUm}~ݷݦݠݦ hY^J jh7+hY0JCU\^Jh7+hY]^Jh7+hY6]^J h9t^Jh7+hY6^Jh7+hY^Jjh7+hY0JCU^Jh7+hY\^J?,-|   ,;<= /01GWXYo          !P!!!!!h7+hY6^Jh7+hY\^J jh7+hY0JCU\^Jh7+hY]^Jh7+hY6]^Jjh7+hY0JCU^Jh7+hY^JD/W !!"+""#]$%'*u,-/0255!7BgdABgdtYBgd]O@gd["XBgd>yBgd!>BgdLBgd["XBgdC}Bgd5,pBgd|bB!!!!!!""""*"+","-"\"f"l""""""""#!#'#F#c#p########$$-$\$]$^$_$$$$$$$%%%P%S%v&~&&&''''(((()+)`)a)뱷 hY^Jh7+hY\^J jh7+hY0JCU\^Jh7+hY6^Jjh7+hY0JCU^Jh7+hY^Jh7+hY6]^JFa)))* * * ***G*d*i****"+#+y+++++++#,u,v, -------.].k....2/G/I/v///// 0001111W1]11111h["XhY]^Jh7+hY6]^J hY\^Jh7+hY\^J jh7+hY0JCU\^Jjh7+hY0JCU^J hY^Jh7+hYH*^Jh7+hY6^Jh7+hY^J;12 2)2J22222333333344555S555!7"7Q7{788,8-8>8?88888999(::::::;&;';;;;;< <U<硳#h7+hY0J*6>*B*^Jph"j)h7+hY6U^Jjh7+hY6U^Jh7+hY]^Jh7+hY6]^Jjh7+hY0JCU^Jh7+hY6^J hY^Jh7+hY^J8!789:&;U<<$>>>?@AAAA[崥83a(<"Bgd]OBBgd2SBgd)yBgd#U<V<W<h<<<<<<$>%>q>r>s>>>>>>>g??????w@@@@.A7AcAdAAAAAAAAӻӻӻ籭h#dhm0z hY^J hY\^J jh7+hY0JCU\^Jh7+hY\^Jh7+hY6^Jh7+hY^Jjh7+hY0JCU^J(:&P 1h:p>jBP. A!"#$% }DyK _Toc164580462}DyK _Toc164580462}DyK _Toc164580463}DyK _Toc164580463}DyK _Toc164580464}DyK _Toc164580464}DyK _Toc164580465}DyK _Toc164580465}DyK _Toc164580466}DyK _Toc164580466}DyK _Toc164580467}DyK _Toc164580467}DyK _Toc164580468}DyK _Toc164580468}DyK _Toc164580469}DyK _Toc164580469}DyK _Toc164580470}DyK _Toc164580470}DyK _Toc164580471}DyK _Toc164580471}DyK _Toc164580472}DyK _Toc164580472}DyK _Toc164580473}DyK _Toc164580473}DyK _Toc164580474}DyK _Toc164580474}DyK _Toc164580475}DyK _Toc164580475}DyK _Toc164580476}DyK _Toc164580476}DyK _Toc164580477}DyK _Toc164580477}DyK _Toc164580478}DyK _Toc164580478}DyK _Toc164580479}DyK _Toc164580479}DyK _Toc164580480}DyK _Toc164580480}DyK _Toc164580481}DyK _Toc164580481}DyK _Toc164580482}DyK _Toc164580482}DyK _Toc164580483}DyK _Toc164580483}DyK _Toc164580484}DyK _Toc164580484}DyK _Toc164580485}DyK _Toc164580485}DyK _Toc164580486}DyK _Toc164580486}DyK _Toc164580487}DyK _Toc164580487}DyK _Toc164580488}DyK _Toc164580488}DyK _Toc164580489}DyK _Toc164580489}DyK _Toc164580490}DyK _Toc164580490}DyK _Toc164580491}DyK _Toc164580491}DyK _Toc164580492}DyK _Toc164580492}DyK _Toc164580493}DyK _Toc164580493}DyK _Toc164580494}DyK _Toc164580494}DyK _Toc164580495}DyK _Toc164580495}DyK _Toc164580496}DyK _Toc164580496}DyK _Toc164580497}DyK _Toc164580497}DyK _Toc164580498}DyK _Toc164580498}DyK _Toc164580499}DyK _Toc164580499}DyK _Toc164580500}DyK _Toc164580500}DyK _Toc164580501}DyK _Toc164580501}DyK _Toc164580502}DyK _Toc164580502}DyK _Toc164580503}DyK _Toc164580503}DyK _Toc164580504}DyK _Toc164580504DyK <http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200702/s1841691.htmACTFACTDD@D |9(NormalCJOJQJ_HmH sH tH b@b R Heading 1$ & F<@&5CJ KH OJQJ\^JaJ @ RHeading 2,Heading 2 Char Char$ & F<@& 56CJOJQJ\]^JaJ^@^ R Heading 3$ & F<@&5CJOJQJ\^JaJ^@^ K1 Heading 4'$ & F^<@&^^` 6\aJVV R Heading 5 & F<@&6OJQJ\]aJPP R Heading 6 & F<@&OJQJ\aJPP R Heading 7 & F<@&>*OJQJaJDA@D Default Paragraph FontRiR  Table Normal4 l4a (k(No List HFootnote Text,Footnote Text Char,Footnote Text Char1 Char,Footnote Text Char Char Char,Footnote Text Char1 Char Char Char,Footnote Text Char Char Char Char Char,Footnote Text Char2 Char Char Char Char Char,Footnote Text Char1,Footnote Text Char Char CJOJQJ\A\ TxStyle Heading 4 + Not Bold  & F\vv Tx+Style Style Heading 4 + Not Bold + Not Bold]" I=Style Heading 1Heading 1 Char + Left: 0 cm First line: 0 cm^JaJF12F BaStyle1  & F56CJaJmH sH H@BH  Q Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ@&Q@ GZFootnote ReferenceH*DObD GZ paragraphdd[$\$aJtH LqL GZparagraph CharCJ_HaJmH sH tH bb 81rHeading 1 Char.5CJ KH OJQJ\^J_HaJ mH sH tH HH 81r subsection2dd[$\$aJtH ,O, 81r charsectno@B@ 81r Body Text $a$aJtH LL 81rBody Text CharCJ_HaJmH sH tH jj 81r Table Grid7:V0~~ 81rLegislation Level a b c HREOC7<x^7CJ^J_HmH sH tH tt 81r"Legislation Level a b c HREOC CharCJ^J_HmH sH tH hh 81r Legislation Level i ii iii HREOC S<^SFOF 81r definition!dd[$\$aJtH 6"6 Jp1"dd[$\$aJtH 626 Jp2#dd[$\$aJtH 6B6 Jp3$dd[$\$aJtH 6R6 Jr2%dd[$\$aJtH fbf J!Legislation Level PRE a b c HREOC &^&@& XTOC 1'.@. XTOC 2 (^.@. XTOC 3 )^6U@6 X Hyperlink >*B*phJ^J w( Normal (Web)+dd[$\$aJtH 4 @4 Footer , 9r .)@.  Page Number4@4 Header . 9r e [!HTML Preformatted7/ 2( Px 4 #\'*.25@9CJOJQJ^JtH $O$ H?italic kroO! khitF2F \ subsection3dd[$\$aJtH JBJ \ paragraphsub4dd[$\$aJtH bRb .Default 57$8$H$-B*CJOJQJ^J_HaJmH phsH tH .Xa. LEmphasis6]@r@ |{8boxtext7dd[$\$aJtH 88 9zr18dd[$\$aJtH 66 9he9dd[$\$aJtH HH ;9 examplebody:dd[$\$aJtH PP :9examplebody CharCJ_HaJmH sH tH FVF aFollowedHyperlink >*B*ph`d B'B )Comment ReferenceCJaJ88 ) Comment Text>CJ@j@ )Comment Subject?5\0O0 Footnote@CJ.@. #TOC 4 A^8+@"8  vo Endnote TextBCJ>*@1>  voEndnote ReferenceH*/01B368;=U?bBoDE5GHIKLMMNrOO%STWadeoss=uu8vv;x=yzgz}~ ΄ۅ'}sއ3"oƋ}ʐKs aY,gEn¬ƭ[\* >$W9  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^ 1&8   D o  15g.nMw'Arqr !!">"""N$$$$%n%%%%&'(I(z((()P)v))))3+",J,r,,U-../@2467b:: =?@AB D3EEF&GHHIIhKKLOLRL9n/  TU 0!1!_"`"##\##$p$$Q%R%%%.'/'e'f')***v+++ ,C,~,,,,,----....C/ 0 0C0001111#2222U3V33344 5"5P555665767u7v7+8,8B9;; < <<<*===>??䰪ɵBB:CCCDD12EEGGHHIIRRV'ٰѧWWʳXXZZʰ[[\\]]^^ոaabbbdddee89gghhjjjjܳڳղoձrr;ssss?;? ./JK*f)*92000C20002000C2000u2000C20002000`200020002000200#022000c#2000 !2000[#2000\#2000b#2000$2000&2000%2000&2000&200 0'@0200)0%*2000#20000$2000$2000$2000d%@020002000200-0+200.0+200/0D,2000200020020.20030.20040.20060(/20070S/20080/20090/200:0/200;00200=0?0@02000200@00200020002000:0002000_2000X2000200`02000 200K082000 2000 2000 200020000 :00.0p2000020030 20050 @020010{2000200.0p:00*0c@ 0200f0`8200g0p9200h0q9200i09200j09@!0@!0@!02000200f0?200X097:00020000200q0;200r0<200t0=200u0=200v0K@:0070A2000O20009200z0ZA200K02000200M0W2000B200P0\200Q0200S0200T0:00;0h200$02000D2000E200X0200Z02000F:000G 2000 200c0S2000pG2000G2000G200d0V200e0W2000G200a02000N2000N2000G2000|O2000&J2000P2000oK2000pK2000L2000L@#02000]M2000 :00~0200V 0eO 2000BO200,0 200r02000O2000P2000V2000\:00#02000-2000 5200052000620006:00#02000:2000.20000o2000\o2000jo2000/2000 U20005q2000-s2000/20003@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 020020 2000zj2000u2000u2000j2000j200U0CC2000Jk20002000}l20007y:000x2000z2000z2000{2000{2000|:000n|2000I}2000200 0~200H0MH2000}l:00%020002000|20002000200020002000ݼ2000}l2000c2000e2000f2000f2000f:00+0\2000޼2000Ʒ2000Kt200!0Ɔ200"0ڇ2000Lt200%0200&02000;:000w2000200-0q2000f2000 x2000h2000^200 020002000h2000h:000OE2000[E2000h2000i2000`2000"G2000NG2000vG2000G2000n2000n2000j2000 l2000 l2000l2000DI2000q:000q2000DI2000r2000s20000t20001t2000}t2000t2000t2000Tu2000 u2000u2000v200 0v200!0w200"0x200#0x200$0x200%0.y200-0@z20010z:0002N2000DI20050{20060{20070>200*0200+020080?20090}200:0}200;0}:000*2000ٱ2000$20002000ڶ200020002000ڀ2000$200<0{200A0Ő200B0Ɛ2005020060200=0:000T2000LT2000n200N0̂200O0͂200P02000p2000\2000DI20002000200L0:000:T2000LT200[0E200\0Ӆ200]0ԅ200^0E200_0F200`0Ć200a0ņ200b0200c0200d0200f0200g0200h0A200i0o200j0200_0w200`0:000OT2000wT2000fv2000v2000v2000x2000x2000x2000]y200x0F200n0:000d2000VI200{0200|0200}02000g2000ˑ2000Y2000Z2000(20002000 >00202000˻20002000M20002000m2000r20002000 2000Q2000_200020002000 20002000m:00032000200020002000:2000G2000Z2000[2000Ư:000*2000L2000M20002000200H0VH20002000|:00020002000}20002000200020002000j2000k200#0&200&0@200'0:00(0200*0200*020002000O200 H0ZH2000)200H0]H:000&2000h2000j200502000k2000200G020090200G0200H02000V2000200S02000u200020002000200F0I200/H0H2000H0H:000200tH0=H60040200H0[H200H0DH200vH0H200wH0H2000200H0 H200-0200U0ԣ2000200(0 5200)05200*0+7200020003200042000:0002000e2000K2000pL200d0IK:0004M2000M600y0 200H0*H600z0z600{02000uN2000vN200C 0 20002000p2000]S2000Q200u0S200v0S2000R2000uT200H04H200H04H20002000Y2000Z:000!2000a600z0z200H0vCH200H0wCH200H0CH200H04DH200H0DH200J0200H0EEH200I02000Lc2000c2000c2000d2000J"2000"2000{#20007$20005%20006%200H0CMH200/08200_0 200`0 200a0 :00b0 200H0,OH200H0-OH200H0-PH200H0.PH200c0I 200d0 200e0S 200f0 200g0 :00H0TH200H0UH200H0UH2000@0@0@& 0@& 0@& 0@& 0@& 0@& 0@& 0@& 02000200\0 A200]0A@02000n@0200y0200z0@0200|07200}0200~0@020002000)2000*@0200020002000@020002000a20002000200Z0200\02002H0`H20060:600y0 2008H0bH2009H0bH200:H0bH600z0z200\02000b 00@0@0@0@0@0 00QL/  TU 0!1!_"`"##\##$p$$Q%R%%%.'/'e'f')***v+++ ,C,~,,,,,----....C/ 0 0C0001111#2222U3V33344 5"5P555665767u7v7+8,8B9;; < <<<*===>??䰪ɵBB:CCCDD12EEGGHHIIRRV'ٰѧWWʳXXZZʰ[[\\]]^^ոaabbbdddee89gghhjjjjܳڳղoձrr;ssss?;? ./JK*f)*9  00 00"0"0"0"0"0"0"0"00" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0"( 0"  0"  0"  0" 0"  00i10i10i1(0i1(0i10i10i10i10i1(0i1( 0i1 0i1 0i1 0i1( 0i1 0i10i1* 0i1i10808080808: 0880:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:: 0880=0=!0=0=0=0=0=: 0880?`0?`0?`0?`0?0?8 0? 0? 0?0?0?0?* 0i1i10eC0eC0eC80eC80eC80eC@: 0eCeC0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G: 0eCeC05L05L@05L@05L05L05L* 0i1i10N0N 0N@ 0N@0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N 0N 0N* 0i1i10{VH0{VH0{V 0{V0{VH0{VP0{VP0{VP* 0i1i10[0[00[00[00[* 0i1i10]0]( 0]h 0]h 0]h0](0]P0]p0]p0](&0]00]00]00]00]00]80]0]p 0p0:e0:e0:e@0:e@0:e0:e0:ex* 0:e:ex0Ehx0Ehx0Ehx0Ehx0Ehx* 0:e:ex0jx0j0jx0j0j* 0:e:ex0 m0 m0 m0 m0 m0 m0 m0 m0 m`0 m`0 m`0 m`0 m`* 0:e:e0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r0r 00w0w0w`0w`0wh0w0w0w0wh0wh* 0ww@0~@0~h0~h0~`0~@0~@0~@0~@0~h0~h0~h0~h0~h0~h0~H0~p* 0wwp0H0p0p0p/0p/0p/0p0p0p0p0p0p0p0p0x0x0x0x0x0x* 0wwH0H0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x* 0wwP0 H0 x0 x0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0wwP0P0h0000p0X0H000* 0wwP0P00000000000000000* 0wwP0ߞP0ߞp0ߞp0ߞp0ߞx0ߞx0ߞx0ߞx0ߞ0ߞ* 0ww`0.H0.0.0.0.`0.`0.`0.`0.`0.0.0.0.0.0. 0000(00 0 000000000* 000 0 0 0000: 00X0X0X0X0X0X0X: 00p0p0p0p0p0p0p0p0p 0p0p: 00պ0պ0պ0պ0պ0պ0պ* 00>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>* 00:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:  000000000000000* 000H0H0H0H: 0H0/H0/ 0/( 0/ 0/0/H0/H!0/!0/0/0/0/P0/P0/P0/P0/P0/P0/00/00/0/X0/X: 0 0^`0^0^@0^@ 0^@ 0^@ 0^@0^`0^@0^`0^` 0^` 0^` 0^` 0^  0^  0^  0^ 0^ 0^ 0^H* 08000: 00H0H0P0P 0 0 0 00: 0P0P0P000 +0 +0 +0 +0 +0 +0 +0 +0 +0 +0 @+0o@+0o+0o+0o200{0200|00o@0o20002000@0o20002000)2000*@0o200020002000@0o@0o@0o@0o0o200\0200^02005\ 0`\ @0o8600{0 200;\ 0b\ 200<\ 0b\ 200=\ 0b\ 600|0z200^0@0o0/!VSYi T 6 r 0  n Jn_,V R  TU 0!1!_"`"##\##$p$$Q%R%%%.'/'e'f')***v+++ ,C,~,,,,,----....C/ 0 0C0001111#2222U3V33344 5"5P555665767u7v7+8,8B9;; < <<<*===>??䰪ɵBB:CCCDD12EEGGHHIIRRV'ٰѧWWʳXXZZʰ[[\\]]^^ոaabbbdddee89gghhjjjjܳڳղoձrr;ssss?;? ./JK*f)*,.147^_`ijkwM'Wvf    T}QAr)S}, </W+]"u$%'(*--!/012&3U44$6r6678c9999 0'0(0(0)0A0A0A0)0A0A0)0)0)0)0(0)0)0)0)0(0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0(0)0A0A0A0)0)0(0)0A0A0)0A0A0)00 000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 00 00R%0R%0R%0R%0R%0R%0R%0R%0R%0R% 0R% 0R% 0R% 0R% 0R% 0R%0R%( 0R%R%0,0,0,0,0,8 0,,0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-8 0,,0101!01010101018 0,,0V30V30V30V30V30V30V30V30V30V30V30V3( 0R%R%0670670670670670678 067670;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;8 067670@0@0@0@0@0@( 0R%R%0xB0xB 0xB 0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB0xB( 0R%R%0=J0=J0=J0=J0=J0=J0=J0=J( 0R%R%0N0N0N0N0N( 0R%R%0UQ0UQ 0UQ 0UQ 0UQ0UQ0UQ0UQ0UQ0UQ0UQ0UQ0UQ0UQ0UQ0UQ0UQ0UQ 00~X0~X0~X0~X0~X0~X0~X( 0~X~X0P[0P[0P[0P[0P[( 0~X~X0]0]0]0]0]( 0~X~X0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`( 0~X~X0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e 00j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j( 0jj0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq0Tq( 0jj0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v( 0jj0~0~0~0~0~0~0~0~0~0~( 0jj00000000000000( 0jj000000000000( 0jj0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ0ʋ( 0jj0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N0N( 0jj0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e 0000000000000000( 00.0. 0. 0. 0.0.0.0.8 0..00000008 0..000000000008 0..0Ŭ0Ŭ0Ŭ0Ŭ0Ŭ0Ŭ0Ŭ( 00.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.( 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  0000000000( 00f0f0f0f0f8 0ff00 0 0 0000!000000000000008 0ff0000 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000( 00008 00000 0 0 0 008 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000000( 00/0/0/0/0/0/ 0/ 0/ 0/0/0/H@0@0@0@0@.0@.0@00@,01@,0@0@,0@,0@0 00@0@0@0@0@B0@B0@B0@!0@B0@B0@0@0@B0@0@0@0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@@0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0@B0 00L/!VSYi T 6 r 0  n Jn_,V R  TU 0!1!_"`"##\##$p$$Q%R%%%.'/'e'f')***v+++ ,C,~,,,,,----....C/ 0 0C0001111#2222U3V33344 5"5P555665767u7v7+8,8B9;; < <<<*===>??䰪ɵBB:CCCDD12EEGGHHIIRRV'ٰѧWWʳXXZZʰ[[\\]]^^ոaabbbdddee89gghhjjjjܳڳղoձrr;ssss?;? ./JK*f)*,./124578^_`ijkwM'Wvf    T}QAr)S}, </W+]"u$%'(*--!/012&3U44$6r6678c9999 0'0(0(0)0A0A0A0)0A0A0)0)0)0)0(0)0)0)0)0(0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0(0)0A0A0A0)0)0(0)0A0A0)0A0A0)00 000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 00 00^%0^%0^%0^%0^%0^%0^%0^%0^%0^% 0^% 0^% 0^% 0^% 0^% 0^%0^%( 0^%^%0,0,0,0,0,8 0,,0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-8 0,,0101!01001001001018 0,,0b30b30b30b30b30b30b30b30b30b30b30b3( 0^%^%0B70B70B70B70B70B78 0B7B70;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;8 0B7B70@0@0@0@0@0@( 0^%^%0B0B 0B 0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B0B( 0^%^%0IJ0IJ0IJ0IJ0IJ0IJ0IJ0IJ( 0^%^%0N0N0N0N0N( 0^%^%0`Q0`Q( 0`Q( 0`Q( 0`Q(0`Q(0`Q0`Q0`Q0`Q(0`Q00`Q0`Q0`Q0`Q0`Q0`Q0`Q 00X0X0X0X0X0X0X( 0XX0[[0[[0[[0[[0[[( 0XX0]0]0]0]0]( 0XX0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`0`( 0XX0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e0e 00j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j( 0jj0eq0eq0eq0eq0eq0eq00eq00eq0eq0eq0eq0eq0eq0eq0eq0eq( 0jj0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v0v( 0jj0~0~0~0~0~0~0~0~0~0~( 0jj00000000000000( 0jj000000000000( 0jj0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P0P( 0jjP0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j( 0jj000000000000000 0060606060606060606060606060606( 0660L0L 0L 0L 0L0L0L0L8 0LL00000008 0LL000000000008 0LL0R00R00R0R0R0R0R( 0660000000000000000000( 066000000000 0000000000( 0000008 00G0G 0G 0G 0G0G0G0G!0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G0G8 00E0E0E0E 0E 0E 0E0E0E0E0E 0E 0E 0E 0E 0E 0E 0E0E0E0E( 00404048 0440000 0 0 0 008 0440j0j0j0j0j 0j 0j 0j 0j 0j 0j 0j 0j 0j 0 j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j0j( 0000000 0 0  0 000L@0h00@0h00@0h00@0h00@.0@.0@0@,0@,0@0@,0@,0h00t h00b\h00`h00_@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0h0 0/@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0h00E@0@0@0@0h0#0?@0h0>00>00>00>000@0@0@0000#0@0000@000@000@00000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@00"0@0@0@0ī@0ī@0ī@0@0ī@0ī@0ī@00>00>00>00>00>0@00>00>0@0@000000000000000000000<0*00h0>0@000L 4?dddg z g'/ I&1+.O246R78=_@ DFIK5O5SX^cjnTyaЄJ]= 8,>bO^%y  !a)1U<A   !$&'(*+,-/02346+,,13C44C7:6?DxJhKQVZ>Z~`dThoTy~;oʓMeâ.O.vj^n3}_2*i!7A   "#%).15A/GHh!A5QSTVv2NPQSs8TVWYyHdfgij @2NQRTt  0 3 4 6 V P l o p r  * - . 0 P q   # L h k l n (DGHJjLhkln =Y\]_ &)*,L4PSTVv *0LOPRrhf!(5/6H<C{W^9 X%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕX%ĕ̕XXXXXXX4;DKMR]`g!!$NV#BBBRLXXX8@0(  B S  ? _Toc164580462 _Hlt164847018 _Hlt164847019 _Hlt164838843 _Hlt164838844 _Toc163288157 _Toc164580463 _Toc163288158 _Toc164580464 _Toc163288159 _Toc164580465 _Toc163288160 _Toc164580466 _Toc163288161 _Toc164580467 _Toc163288162 _Toc164580468 _Toc163288163 _Toc164580469 _Toc163288164 _Toc164580470 _Toc163288165 _Toc164580471 _Toc163288166 _Toc164580472 _Toc163288167 _Toc164580473 _Toc160611101 _Toc160611103 _Toc160611104 _Toc160611105 _Toc160611107 _Toc160611108 _Toc160611109 _Toc162936950 _Toc162937037 _Toc162943004 _Toc162954361 _Toc162936951 _Toc162937038 _Toc162943005 _Toc162954362 _Toc162936953 _Toc162937040 _Toc162943007 _Toc162954364 _Toc162936954 _Toc162937041 _Toc162943008 _Toc162954365 _Toc162936955 _Toc162937042 _Toc162943009 _Toc162954366 _Toc162936956 _Toc162937043 _Toc162943010 _Toc162954367 _Toc162936957 _Toc162937044 _Toc162943011 _Toc162954368 _Toc162936958 _Toc162937045 _Toc162943012 _Toc162954369 _Toc162936959 _Toc162937046 _Toc162943013 _Toc162954370 _Toc162936960 _Toc162937047 _Toc162943014 _Toc162954371 _Toc162936961 _Toc162937048 _Toc162943015 _Toc162954372 _Toc162936966 _Toc162937053 _Toc162943020 _Toc162954377 _Toc162936967 _Toc162937054 _Toc162943021 _Toc162954378 _Toc162936968 _Toc162937055 _Toc162943022 _Toc162954379 _Toc162936969 _Toc162937056 _Toc162943023 _Toc162954380 _Toc162936970 _Toc162937057 _Toc162943024 _Toc162954381 _Toc162936971 _Toc162937058 _Toc162943025 _Toc162954382 _Toc162936973 _Toc162937060 _Toc162943027 _Toc162954384 _Toc162936974 _Toc162937061 _Toc162943028 _Toc162954385 _Toc162936975 _Toc162937062 _Toc162943029 _Toc162954386 _Toc162936982 _Toc162937069 _Toc162943036 _Toc162954393 _Toc162936983 _Toc162937070 _Toc162943037 _Toc162954394 _Toc162936984 _Toc162937071 _Toc162943038 _Toc162954395 _Toc162936985 _Toc162937072 _Toc162943039 _Toc162954396 _Toc162936986 _Toc162937073 _Toc162943040 _Toc162954397 _Toc162936987 _Toc162937074 _Toc162943041 _Toc162954398 _Toc162936988 _Toc162937075 _Toc162943042 _Toc162954399 _Toc162936990 _Toc162937077 _Toc162943044 _Toc162954401 _Toc162936991 _Toc162937078 _Toc162943045 _Toc162954402 _Toc162936992 _Toc162937079 _Toc162943046 _Toc162954403 _Toc162936993 _Toc162937080 _Toc162943047 _Toc162954404 _Toc162936994 _Toc162937081 _Toc162943048 _Toc162954405 _Toc162936995 _Toc162937082 _Toc162943049 _Toc162954406 _Toc162936996 _Toc162937083 _Toc162943050 _Toc162954407 _Toc163288168 _Toc164580474 _Toc163288169 _Toc164580475 _Toc163288170 _Toc164580476 _Toc163288171 _Toc164580477 _Toc163288172 _Toc164580478 _Toc163288173 _Toc164580479 _Toc163288174 _Toc164580480 _Toc162840817 _Toc163288175 _Toc164580481 _Toc163288176 _Toc164580482 _Toc163288177 _Toc164580483 _Toc163288178 _Toc164580484 _Toc161307445 _Toc163288179 _Toc164580485 _Toc162840823 _Toc162840824 _Toc163288180 _Toc164580486 _Toc163288181 _Toc164580487 _Toc161307449 _Toc161307450 _Toc163288182 _Toc164580488 _Toc163288183 _Toc164580489 _Toc162671018 _Toc162671226 _Toc162671947 _Toc162672227 _Toc162671019 _Toc162671227 _Toc162671948 _Toc162672228 _Toc162671020 _Toc162671228 _Toc162671949 _Toc162672229 _Toc162671021 _Toc162671229 _Toc162671950 _Toc162672230 _Toc162671022 _Toc162671230 _Toc162671951 _Toc162672231 _Toc162671023 _Toc162671231 _Toc162671952 _Toc162672232 _Toc162671024 _Toc162671232 _Toc162671953 _Toc162672233 _Toc162671025 _Toc162671233 _Toc162671954 _Toc162672234 _Toc162671027 _Toc162671235 _Toc162671956 _Toc162672236 _Toc162671028 _Toc162671236 _Toc162671957 _Toc162672237 _Toc162671029 _Toc162671237 _Toc162671958 _Toc162672238 _Toc162671030 _Toc162671238 _Toc162671959 _Toc162672239 _Toc162671031 _Toc162671239 _Toc162671960 _Toc162672240 _Toc162671032 _Toc162671240 _Toc162671961 _Toc162672241 _Toc162671033 _Toc162671241 _Toc162671962 _Toc162672242 _Toc162671034 _Toc162671242 _Toc162671963 _Toc162672243 _Toc162671035 _Toc162671243 _Toc162671964 _Toc162672244 _Toc162671046 _Toc162671254 _Toc162671975 _Toc162672255 _Toc162671047 _Toc162671255 _Toc162671976 _Toc162672256 _Toc162671048 _Toc162671256 _Toc162671977 _Toc162672257 _Toc162671049 _Toc162671257 _Toc162671978 _Toc162672258 _Toc162671050 _Toc162671258 _Toc162671979 _Toc162672259 _Toc162671052 _Toc162671260 _Toc162671981 _Toc162672261 _Toc162671053 _Toc162671261 _Toc162671982 _Toc162672262 _Toc162671054 _Toc162671262 _Toc162671983 _Toc162672263 _Toc162671055 _Toc162671263 _Toc162671984 _Toc162672264 _Toc162671056 _Toc162671264 _Toc162671985 _Toc162672265 _Toc162671057 _Toc162671265 _Toc162671986 _Toc162672266 _Toc162671058 _Toc162671266 _Toc162671987 _Toc162672267 _Toc162671059 _Toc162671267 _Toc162671988 _Toc162672268 _Toc162671060 _Toc162671268 _Toc162671989 _Toc162672269 _Toc162671061 _Toc162671269 _Toc162671990 _Toc162672270 _Toc162671062 _Toc162671270 _Toc162671991 _Toc162672271 _Toc162671064 _Toc162671272 _Toc162671993 _Toc162672273 _Toc162671065 _Toc162671273 _Toc162671994 _Toc162672274 _Toc162671066 _Toc162671274 _Toc162671995 _Toc162672275 _Toc162671068 _Toc162671276 _Toc162671997 _Toc162672277 _Toc162840832 _Toc162840834 _Toc162840836 _Toc162840838 _Toc162840840 _Toc162840841 _Toc162840842 _Toc162840844 _Toc162840847 _Toc162840848 _Toc162840849 _Toc162840850 _Toc162840852 _Toc162840853 _Toc162840854 _Toc161307459 _Toc161307460 _Toc162840855 _Toc162840856 _Toc162840858 _Toc162840859 _Toc162840860 _Toc162840861 _Toc162840862 _Toc162840863 _Toc162840864 _Toc162840866 _Toc162840867 _Toc162840868 _Toc162840869 _Toc162840870 _Toc162840871 _Toc162840872 _Toc162840874 _Toc162840876 _Toc162840878 _Toc162840879 _Toc162840880 _Toc162840882 _Toc162840883 _Toc162840884 _Toc162672002 _Toc162672282 _Toc162672003 _Toc162672283 _Toc162840886 _Toc162840888 _Toc162840890 _Toc162840892 _Toc162840894 _Toc162594736 _Toc163288184 _Toc164580490 _Toc162594737 _Toc163288185 _Toc164580491 _Toc163288186 _Toc164580492 _Toc163288187 _Toc164580493 _Toc163288188 _Toc164580494 _Toc162594738 _Toc163288189 _Toc164580495 _Toc162954430 _Toc162954432 _Toc162954434 _Toc162954435 _Toc162954436 _Toc162954438 _Toc162954440 _Toc162954442 _Toc162954444 _Toc162954446 _Toc162954448 _Toc162954449 _Toc162954450 _Toc162954451 _Toc162954452 _Toc162954454 _Toc162954458 _Toc162954459 _Toc162954460 _Toc162954462 _Toc162954463 _Toc162954464 _Toc162954465 _Toc162594739 _Toc163288190 _Toc164580496 _Toc162840899 _Toc162840900 _Toc162840902 _Toc161307465 _Toc161307466 _Toc160611137 _Toc160611138 _Toc160611140 _Toc160611141 _Toc160611142 _Toc161307472 _Toc161307473 _Toc161307474 _Toc160611145 _Toc160611147 _Toc162840903 _Toc163288191 _Toc164580497 _Toc163288192 _Toc164580498 _Toc163548418 _Toc164067675 _Toc163548419 _Toc164067676 _Toc163288193 _Toc164580499 _Toc163548422 _Toc164067679 _Toc163548424 _Toc164067681 _Toc163548427 _Toc164067684 _Toc163548428 _Toc164067685 _Toc163548430 _Toc164067687 _Toc163548431 _Toc164067688 _Toc163548432 _Toc164067689 _Toc163548434 _Toc164067691 _Toc163548435 _Toc164067692 _Toc163548436 _Toc164067693 _Toc163548437 _Toc164067694 _Toc163548438 _Toc164067695 _Toc163548439 _Toc164067696 _Toc163548440 _Toc164067697 _Toc163288195 _Toc164580500 _Toc162954472 _Toc162954473 _Toc162840911 _Toc162671147 _Toc162671355 _Toc162672078 _Toc162672358 _Toc162671148 _Toc162671356 _Toc162672079 _Toc162672359 _Toc162671149 _Toc162671357 _Toc162672080 _Toc162672360 _Toc162671151 _Toc162671359 _Toc162672082 _Toc162672362 _Toc162671154 _Toc162671362 _Toc162672085 _Toc162672365 _Toc162671155 _Toc162671363 _Toc162672086 _Toc162672366 _Toc162671156 _Toc162671364 _Toc162672087 _Toc162672367 _Toc162671158 _Toc162671366 _Toc162672089 _Toc162672369 _Toc162671160 _Toc162671368 _Toc162672091 _Toc162672371 _Toc162671161 _Toc162671369 _Toc162672092 _Toc162672372 _Toc162671162 _Toc162671370 _Toc162672093 _Toc162672373 _Toc162671164 _Toc162671372 _Toc162672095 _Toc162672375 _Toc162671165 _Toc162671373 _Toc162672096 _Toc162672376 _Toc162671167 _Toc162671375 _Toc162672098 _Toc162672378 _Toc162671168 _Toc162671376 _Toc162672099 _Toc162672379 _Toc162671169 _Toc162671377 _Toc162672100 _Toc162672380 _Toc162671170 _Toc162671378 _Toc162672101 _Toc162672381 _Toc162671171 _Toc162671379 _Toc162672102 _Toc162672382 _Toc162671173 _Toc162671381 _Toc162672104 _Toc162672384 _Toc162671175 _Toc162671383 _Toc162672106 _Toc162672386 _Toc162671176 _Toc162671384 _Toc162672107 _Toc162672387 _Toc162671177 _Toc162671385 _Toc162672108 _Toc162672388 _Toc162671179 _Toc162671387 _Toc162672110 _Toc162672390 _Toc162671181 _Toc162671389 _Toc162672112 _Toc162672392 _Toc162671183 _Toc162671391 _Toc162672114 _Toc162672394 _Toc162671185 _Toc162671393 _Toc162672116 _Toc162672396 _Toc162671187 _Toc162671395 _Toc162672118 _Toc162672398 _Toc162671189 _Toc162671397 _Toc162672120 _Toc162672400 _Toc162671191 _Toc162671399 _Toc162672122 _Toc162672402 _Toc162671193 _Toc162671401 _Toc162672124 _Toc162672404 _Toc162671194 _Toc162671402 _Toc162672125 _Toc162672405 _Toc162671195 _Toc162671403 _Toc162672126 _Toc162672406 _Toc162671197 _Toc162671405 _Toc162672128 _Toc162672408 _Toc163288196 _Toc164580501 _Toc163288197 _Toc164580502 _Toc163288198 _Toc164580503 _Toc163288199 _Toc164580504__~~R%R%,,--11V3V36767;;@@xBxB=J=JNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNUQUQ~X~XP[P[]]``eejjjTqTqvv~~ʋʋNNNNee...ŬŬ... ff//9@@@@  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~-``  %%,,..1133t7t7<<A@A@BBJJNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOQQXX[[^^R`R`7f7fjjjfqfqvv~~ NN~~___@gg ii11 II9F+ !+]++L+t ++q+\+, +++<^+ +m+< +C!+,2"+ #++$+$(%+(&+4'+(+)+*+C++dD,+T-+.+\/+L0+1+̾2+ԧ3+4+5+26+|7+a8+9+̘:+};+9<+9=+/>+$?+@+cA+DcB+%C+%D+E+F+G+4H+I+4J+K+ L+M+,N+O+P+/Q+D/R+dS+T+U+$V+DFF_G_G~~,,̇̇NNxxIIBB00pp77$$$%%=(=(***--x-x-#/#/)/3/Z6Z666@9@9999     " !#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789<:;=>?@ABCDEFFhGhG~~66݇݇##jjQQKKLLxx??$$$"%"%C(C('***8-8---(/1/O/O/`6`666H9H9999 !" #$%&'()*+,-./0123456789;<:=>?@ABCDEBF*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagscountry-region8!*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity9B*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsState=$*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType=%*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceName9E*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace XFEFEBEBEBEBEBEBEBEBEFEBEFEBEBEEEE%$$E!BEEBBE!!!E!E!!EBBEEFE!BB!EFE!EE! ##%&''-hhQ5R5vQvQ\\]]P^P^bbppqq q qʓʓėŗii==˼˼[[LLgg;;&&,,..//124578`hpz~""be8::=ggKK llrr''--SSnn " " " "####))))****--333399 ##''.hh$$$ %~,,C/D//0C0D00001#2$22222E3M3&5)5T5W55555*=+===>>X?`?AAfBnBhCjCCCrDzDJJ5K6KKKvQvQU!UVV+W/WHWKWWW\\]]P^P^c^h^ppqq q qss?sBsgsjsxxaydy}})}+}lmAD56dgʓʓҘӘU\ii==˼˼#[[[Zbnt^fLLggi25;;&&,,..//124578`hpz~yNPc""&NPfo::gg2 4  W V|P 8=int!%KKOuy58!$ILqt*llrr''--&*SSnn " "## (())))****---c-003333&6q6t668b9999933333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 "#&'Z[hhEEhQiQvQvQHZIZXZYZ"[#[2[3[\\\\]]]]B^C^P^P^pp q qqq q q~~~~~~%&!!ɓʓ JKYYۙۙhi??RR..=¬¬MMNNŸŸ˼˼ۼܼ??ggڽڽ11[[\_``1111LLllHHppgg:;%&+,,..//12457`hkpz~#O Z MZ*4-->/E/K6V66699,,..//1245789@.B  pAS ~ȺVjJ 'Juznm␖k!cv 1!qqn#Bo4@\'TX+v N7 Ex&[C<`?dIޢ$Jȟ.w @Lȟ.wMM؁{T(*"9vZHT?'^v b`揰^\~enw ?8*{ }UB i&}U3Y}Upe9H?8*T3?8*'.O\}UibpTLhql'lQ['?8* (8~`0?8*X-Y'+pe ,ql'1g,Fw|o,BF-Fw|8~`0\Y:1?8*0Z3Fw|dX4+7?8*w_;ii;'++X <}UD}U^3B}UlvD?8*l,IFw|#gJbpTL"xO {NFw|hN#gJzO?8*lkPMPFw|}Uii;eVX-Y (f]ZFw|lQ[h\G`u>K{abFw|Yco,dde?8*;UiYcdd!lFw|"xhNhEyFw|u>K{w_; M{}UFw|G`?|}UJRh}}U{~?8*Y~ , L#^;FUo/8 l!G%m,101N4wT{|.!C!IWYyp9G;Q\b(Bc;GZ\iH@oORkmy8Yhlu )H,(Ba]gX[6OTiv   P F N Q d !!*!A!L\!|!%"-"<"F"'K"EM"ia"q"R#wp#r#$'$?$%$%LF%[%]%&s?&F&K&GV&%y&3''('yI'!V'b'("(|9(1E(F(SO([P(R( ))").)=)cC)l)!*98*U@*J*\*i*;"+7+d<+M+c+u+,!,4,{,{-D-s-.*.2._.i.!l.8/U/#/%/t/z/K1$1/1B1D1Ka1_f1q22#3$>3rI3L3q3;z3 4$42*4.494F4I4AS45*5I5j5|5;}56$'6-646f6ro6w6 7J7Z7 8O 88?88?8F8;X8e8|{8%}89989A92L9s9w9::H:;-;0;u;5<X<S[<x<D<l9=<=G=t= >0 >h >1>!>?>6L>H?N?`?f?|?y@ @%@r@ ~@,A/Ah7A\>AyA B#BD6BGBOBC+#CHCp[ClCgwC5D=D0GDfD EEr+EWE hE.wE(F.FhCFmGF{TFgFVhFG G;>GYG* Hs H H HSH"H-H@0HIjI IIbI<JJJ9hJKK/K@K3gKKL L32L=L_AL5BLNL6bLhL(M M M MqMM+6M3;MfMfMvM"N4N JNeNXOCOO8O]3]f5]=]>]h^#^&^o^g_7_,Q_Yj_```s`@"aBabaUoa^oaoaxa#!b|bc>cKcLc0PcYc[ d`d6dDdxNd\dPud|de)eReze[~eFfZKfZf4nf^Yghtgzg+hh6h?hUJhShZhJdh/i;4i";i^izii<jj$jndj1ijykkkBk,kZZkzk=ll/lC4l]lGmem$kmnWn^noEo9uo vop5,p5p&9pTpk5qKPqjqa~qr81r:rBrBbr^)s,sMs\sds9nstswssTt$t-tDtvHtZt>ktl|t uuKuKuI^uvavFvc0v;vvwwyry!z.zm0zCzh[zo}z{*!{,{5{BI{Z{|+|4|7|@|F|Q|Fq|e}}F}]}Gx}{}"~O(~{5~T~u~Acgo %-]@mnyL T J04<Bdl3uw%] P]TUPG'{<_eg;kx).$OPGbu"w \*<bw~ P),Z}delqzC}R@8Z\PuXHu>Wdijv!&(SY^itTl =G%cDso)+~5 >@ky{2?IY//z1:FS@XZy34>!ABQf\9ek"9A!OP[3w'4-ec s+Y,OYuis z>^/ }Tej tluB 7B1#Na%v*-=7L _zl44B3d3Y| !5T#d  )/AOb-hPlo*uB .rde+IU[Se0K 57X\b39:=KdSfv  7BTr$7m#v1;.@Qbkcoq>}'')rMycv~-3178&> m1K7rBEY*Z%q(8)yJP2SZkrx.yz1[=={~;0Ep|w(=u{fLJtVohBz%(:cx"'2E Q+o3@WI &F![!6b8FQW_[w=\')]8=/^lmp`s  LQwRl#U2SAnco^C\`C j35ugi|i9;?MEqMRemj!%qHIYm4z^3 4.m~@--1}6O8]9?>X<%W-ENUVE4/7QcU*2@C,bbdq{P6Dcd*.7I NTRiGw"K"O`w~ hQ>C`[f_ q -4[cc~~c9K]7w "0;CDKN { '5@ fgs+?BUmzf,$-02B34%#&k(458rKy{ ,03PW=u|bJYU-:Vp  8Rtd-Uzt08Y$cn9t:$@O}rz3RS)E # f`cGdhpT">Fg u?L$SY"qr|h&,JM]cfIjrs3|(,W4;EtUYxP3a18>[hmoUv  TwMo(9}M}M}M}M}M}M'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0]n U@899@@Unknownalessandra krilisGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z ArialA& Arial Narrow5& zaTahoma?5 z Courier New;Wingdings"1hZ&y;&섴&4f#yf#yx4d 2qHX?GwARecognising relationships between same-sex couples in federal lawlesvaalessandra krilis|                       Oh+'0   <H h t  DRecognising relationships between same-sex couples in federal lawlesva Normal.dotalessandra krilis52Microsoft Office Word@f@@p @C{@N[f#՜.+,D՜.+,< hp  Human Rights Commissiony BRecognising relationships between same-sex couples in federal law Titlel 8@ _PID_HLINKSA$>+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+U Jhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson8 _Toc1645805048 _Toc1645805038 _Toc1645805028 _Toc1645805018 _Toc1645805009 _Toc1645804999 _Toc1645804989 _Toc1645804979 _Toc1645804969 _Toc1645804959 _Toc1645804949 _Toc1645804939 _Toc1645804929 _Toc1645804919 _Toc1645804909 _Toc1645804899 _Toc1645804889 _Toc1645804879 _Toc1645804869 _Toc1645804859 _Toc1645804849 _Toc1645804839z _Toc1645804829t _Toc1645804819n _Toc1645804809h _Toc1645804799b _Toc1645804789\ _Toc1645804779V _Toc1645804769P _Toc1645804759J _Toc1645804749D _Toc1645804739> _Toc16458047298 _Toc16458047192 _Toc1645804709, _Toc1645804699& _Toc1645804689  _Toc1645804679 _Toc1645804669 _Toc1645804659 _Toc1645804649 _Toc1645804639 _Toc164580462acACT G5http://www.lexisnexis.com.wwwproxy0.nun.unsw.edu.au/au/legal/search/runRemoteLink.do?service=citation&langcountry=AU&risb=21_T1200214455&A=0.6082498136204655&linkInfo=AU%23ald%23year%251995%25page%25344%25decisiondate%251995%25vol%2538%25sel2%2538%25sel1%251995%25&bct=A G5http://www.lexisnexis.com.wwwproxy0.nun.unsw.edu.au/au/legal/search/runRemoteLink.do?service=citation&langcountry=AU&risb=21_T1200214455&A=0.6082498136204655&linkInfo=AU%23ald%23year%251995%25page%25344%25decisiondate%251995%25vol%2538%25sel2%2538%25sel1%251995%25&bct=A   !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./012345679:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F([Data 8 +1TableNcWordDocument+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+U Jhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson+UJhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.htmlperson8 _Toc1645805048 _Toc1645805038 _Toc1645805028 _Toc1645805018 _Toc1645805009 _Toc1645804999 _Toc1645804989 _Toc1645804979 _Toc1645804969 _Toc1645804959 _Toc1645804949 _Toc1645804939 _Toc1645804929 _Toc1645804919 _Toc1645804909 _Toc1645804899 _Toc1645804889 _Toc1645804879 _Toc1645804869 _Toc1645804859 _Toc1645804849 _Toc1645804839z _Toc1645804829t _Toc1645804819n _Toc1645804809h _Toc1645804799b _Toc1645804789\ _Toc1645804779V _Toc1645804769P _Toc1645804759J _Toc1645804749D _Toc1645804739> _Toc16458047298 _Toc16458047192 _Toc1645804709, _Toc1645804699& _Toc1645804689  _Toc1645804679 _Toc1645804669 _Toc1645804659 _Toc1645804649 _Toc1645804639 _Toc164580462acACT G5http://www.lexisnexis.com.wwwproxy0.nun.unsw.edu.au/au/legal/search/runRemoteLink.do?service=citation&langcountry=AU&risb=21_T1200214455&A=0.6082498136204655&linkInfo=AU%23ald%23year%251995%25page%25344%25decisiondate%251995%25vol%2538%25sel2%2538%25sel1%251995%25&bct=A G5http://www.lexisnexis.com.wwwproxy0.nun.unsw.edu.au/au/legal/search/runRemoteLink.do?service=citation&langcountry=AU&risb=21_T1200214455&A=0.6082498136204655&linkInfo=AU%23ald%23year%251995%25page%25344%25decisiondate%251995%25vol%2538%25sel2%2538%25sel1%251995%25&bct=A SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjq