ࡱ>  Nxbjbjss \cc LdyHT|)D=fmZ(L; ; !"DD"$S=U=U=U=U=U=U=@BPU=h"!!h"h"U=; ; j=h"h"h"h"; ; S=h"h"S=h"h"367; 3,h"37?==0=K7`Ch"C077@C8Th"h"h"h"h"h"h"h"U=U=h"h"h"h"=h"h"h"h"Ch"h"h"h"h"h"h"h"h" :  Submission to the 鱨վ Protection from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and sex and/or gender identity Public Consultation November 2010 ACL National Office 4 Campion Street Deakin ACT 2600 Telephone: (02) 6259 0431 Fax: (02) 6259 0462 Email: HYPERLINK "mailto:natoffice@acl.org.au"natoffice@acl.org.au Website: HYPERLINK "http://www.acl.org.au"www.acl.org.au ABN 40 075 120 517 Contents  TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u HYPERLINK \l "_Toc278527819"Executive summary  PAGEREF _Toc278527819 \h 1 HYPERLINK \l "_Toc278527820"Introduction  PAGEREF _Toc278527820 \h 1 HYPERLINK \l "_Toc278527821"Vilification and civil remedies  PAGEREF _Toc278527821 \h 1 HYPERLINK \l "_Toc278527822"Protection of freedom of thought, conscience and religion  PAGEREF _Toc278527822 \h 1 HYPERLINK \l "_Toc278527823"Recent failures by Governments to protect freedom of religion  PAGEREF _Toc278527823 \h 1 HYPERLINK \l "_Toc278527824"International human rights standards about discrimination  PAGEREF _Toc278527824 \h 1 HYPERLINK \l "_Toc278527825"Commonwealth marriage law  PAGEREF _Toc278527825 \h 1 HYPERLINK \l "_Toc278527826"Conclusion  PAGEREF _Toc278527826 \h 1  Executive summary The Australian Christian Lobby (ACL) welcomes the invitation of the 鱨վ (AHRC) for comment on the discussion paper Protection from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity. ACL opposes all forms of unjust discrimination and condemns outright all acts of violence, intimidation, harassment, and vilification, especially those directed at individuals because they are identified as a member of a group with shared characteristics of race, religion or sexual orientation. However, ACL is also concerned to ensure that any changes to existing policy and surrounding Commonwealth anti-discrimination legislation result in a proper balance between the right to equality and protection from unjust discrimination and the competing, equally legitimate right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. ACL notes that the failure of the Victorian Charter of Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (the Charter) to effectively balance these competing rights has led to significant infringements in respect of the latter. These infringements have often reflected a view that supports the rights of people to undertake private, internal religious practices without interference from the state, but strongly opposes any extension of that protection to the public sphere. The consequence is that religious adherents and faith-based organisations are effectively denied their rights by being prevented from operating in the public sphere in accordance with their values and beliefs. This position runs counter to the protection of the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief in the Charter and in international human rights instruments. In view of this trend, and questions such as that raised in the AHRCs discussion paper on Freedom of Religion and Belief in the 21st Century, viz Is there a role for religious voices, alongside others in the policy debates of the nation?, ACL is concerned to ensure that any consolidation of federal anti-discrimination laws does not lead to the kind of infringements on freedom of conscience and action that have occurred in Victoria during the past decade. ACL strongly opposes the inclusion in federal law of prohibitions on vilification and harassment on the basis of sexual orientation, and sex and/or gender identity. The experience with the Victorian Racial and Religious Vilification Act 2001 demonstrates that civil remedies negate the main purpose of anti-vilification and anti-harassment laws by sowing seeds of discord and disharmony within the community. They inculcate a spirit of legal warfare, leading to vexatious claims, costing individuals and organisations their resources and reputations. ACL reiterates its support for the current definition of marriage in the Marriage Act 1961 as being between a man and a woman. This has been the historical, cultural, and religious interpretation of the institution of marriage by the vast majority of peoples around the world. ACL considers that state-based relationship registers adequately addresses any concerns by same sex couples for recognising their relationship without compromising the special status of marriage. The AHRC must ensure that in seeking to protect the human rights of one section of the community it does not, either deliberately or inadvertently, diminish the rights of others. Introduction This submission by the Australian Christian Lobby is in response to the discussion paper Protection from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and/ or gender identity released recently by the 鱨վ. ACL notes the intention to provide the Australian Government with a summary of the outcomes of consultation to assist in harmonising and consolidating federal anti-discrimination law. In recent times ACL has participated in several consultations predominantly with the Victorian Government and its agencies which touch either directly or indirectly upon the issue of sexual orientation and sex and/or gender identity. ACL has made submissions to: the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee of the Victorian Parliament in relation to exceptions and exemptions in the Victorian Equal Opportunity Act 1995; the Eames inquiry into identity motivated hate crime in Victoria; the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee in relation to Senator Sarah Hanson-Youngs Marriage Equality Amendment Bill 2009; and, the AHRCs Freedom of Religion and Belief in the 21st Century project. ACL shares the AHRCs opposition to unreasonable discrimination towards LGBTI people, for example, in relation to the provision of government services by Centrelink and Medicare. In supporting the removal of these restrictions, ACL also notes that Commonwealth legislation introduced in 2008 to improve the financial and legal rights of same sex couples to, inter alia, inheritances, superannuation benefits and social security income support has removed many of the pre-existing barriers to members of the lesbian and gay community. ACL supported these changes by the Government. ACL shares the AHRCs sentiments regarding the levels of personal insults, verbal abuse and threats of violence experienced by LGBTI people. ACL condemns outright all acts of violence, intimidation and harassment, especially those deliberately directed at individuals because they are identified as a member of a group with shared characteristics of race, religion or sexual orientation. Such acts are not markers of respectful societies. ACL condemns homophobic bullying and violence. While noting the papers reference to the higher incidence of anxiety and depression in the LGBTI community, ACL is not convinced that this problem can be addressed adequately through legal measures in relation to homophobia and community prejudice. Vilification and civil remedies ACL notes the focus of the discussion paper on vilification and discrimination. In respect of hate crime, people need to learn to live together and accept that there will be different understandings about how life is to be lived, and that at times offence will be given and taken. The Christian community has often had to accept many hurtful and hateful things said by others, including persons of homosexual orientation, about the Christian faith and related activities and organisations, as have other faith groups. However, ACL considers it is a mistake to create what are basically thought crimes. The stupidity of hatred is better left to be revealed for its irrationality by being exposed than by being driven underground or by creating martyrs through drawn out civil processes. Whilst incitement to violence against persons and their property on the basis of identity must be treated as a criminal offence, matters such as ridicule, insults and generally giving offence, deplorable as they certainly are, should be left as matters for education and social opprobrium, rather than being subject to parties arguing grievances in the civil courts. It is worth noting the operation of the civil provisions in the Victorian Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 (RRTA) in the case involving the Islamic Council of Victoria v Catch the Fire Ministries and two Pastors. This dispute proved hugely expensive, took over five years to resolve, hindered Muslim-Christian relations, and in the end deeply disappointed the Muslim community. The case demonstrated that, contrary to their intention, civil remedies negate the main purpose of anti-vilification and anti-harassment laws by sowing seeds of discord and disharmony within the community. Rather than encouraging disparate groups to dialogue about competing moral positions, civil remedies inculcate a spirit of legal warfare. They lead to vexatious claims, costing individuals and organisations their resources and reputations. Protection of freedom of thought, conscience and religion ACL is concerned to ensure that any changes to existing policy and surrounding Commonwealth anti-discrimination legislation in respect of LGBTI people result in a proper balance between the right to equality and protection from unjust discrimination and the competing, equally legitimate right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. It is also concerned to ensure that, in seeking to eliminate discrimination for a particular minority group, the AHRC does not send the problematic message that certain people are entitled to receive greater protection under the law than others. The fundamental right to religious freedom is recognized in both Australian and international law. The Australian Constitution s 116 deals with religion: The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth. The common law recognizes the freedom of individuals and groups to form and hold religious beliefs and to manifest those beliefs in worship, observance, practice, teaching and dissemination, subject only to the generally applicable constraints of the law. The principle is that each person enjoys complete freedom of religion, not just in his or her private beliefs and ritual observances, but in public practices, teaching and dissemination. This principle is also reflected in Article 18 in the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Australia is a signatory. The implications that flow from the principles enunciated in Article 18 are developed further in the 1981 Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, the 1984 Siracusa Declaration,  and in 1993, in General Comment 22 by the UN Human Rights Committee. Article 18 extends religious freedom beyond mere freedom of belief and worship to include the right of a person to manifest his or her religion or belief in observance, practice and teaching. This reflects the reality that religion does not only involve belief in the supernatural, but also impacts upon, and makes demands upon, the way people believe they should live in the world. Articles 19, 22 and 27 of the ICCPR also protect the right of religious adherents to express religious belief communally in churches, synagogues, mosques and temples, and to organise as a group and put group values into practice. The provisions of the ICCPR establish freedom of religion as one of the very few non-derogable human rights in international law. Article 4(2) of the ICCPR provides that governments may not dispense with it even in a time of national emergency which threatens the very life of the nation. ICCPR limitations on religion are limited to those which involve outward manifestations of religion and then, only where it can be demonstrated that the limitation is necessary to avoid damage to public safety, order, health or morals, or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others. The use of the word fundamental in this context implies the need for a proper balance to ensure that the rights of one group in the community do not automatically override the non-derogable right to religious freedom of another. Recent failures by Governments to protect freedom of religion ACL is concerned to ensure that any consolidation of federal law regarding discrimination avoids the disturbing trend with similar legislation introduced in State jurisdictions during the past decade. Such legislation has extended human rights related to discrimination and equality at the expense of those rights regarding freedom of thought, conscience and religion. The consequence has been to reduce, or remove, a range of rights including the freedom of faith communities to appoint people of faith to their organisations, the freedom to teach and uphold moral standards within their communities, and the freedom to discriminate between right and wrong. These limitations have operated in a way that is contrary to the principles and provisions reflected in the ICCPR which offers no justification for a hierarchy of human rights in which anti-discrimination provisions have precedence over rights to freedom of religion and conscience. The Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities, and its consequential effects on the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (EO Act), is the most obvious example of the inconsistency that exists between Australian law and the provisions and principles contained in the ICCPR (and Siracusa Principles). Article 18(3) of the ICCPR, and the associated Siracusa Provisions, stipulate that limitations on religion must be restricted to those necessary to avoid damage to public safety, order, health or morals, or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others. However, there is no boundary to the grounds on which freedom of religion may be restricted in the Victorian Charter. In particular, the provisions of section 7(2) of the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities allow decision makers in Victoria considerable flexibility to restrict rights to freedom of religion in a far greater range of circumstances than is allowed by the ICCPR. ACL understands that similar weaknesses exist in relation to the ACT Human Rights Act 2004. The impact on religious freedom of these limitations in the Charter became evident in consultations arising from the Victorian Governments 2009 Inquiry into the Exceptions and Exemptions to the Equal Opportunity Act 1995. While an Options paper prepared by the Governments Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee (SARC) stated that, The challenge for Victorian law is to ensure that both the important values of freedom of religion and equality are protected appropriately, no more extensively than is justified, but no more narrowly than is necessary the inquirys terms of reference were clearly targeted at extending the anti-discrimination laws at the expense of other important Charter rights, such as the right to freedom of religion. The Options paper also reflected a view that the practice of religion should be restricted to the private sphere. If the papers recommendations had been accepted in their original form, the views expressed effectively would have prevented religious adherents and faith-based organisations from operating in the public sphere in accordance with their values and beliefs. As it is, while the new Victorian Equal Opportunity Act retains many of the exceptions and exemptions that existed for religious bodies and schools in the previous legislation, it has increased the burden of proof on religious bodies and schools who must now be able to demonstrate that conformity with the doctrines, beliefs or principles of the religion is an inherent requirement of the particular position to which an applicant is appointed. The word inherent is capable of an interpretation that is as wide or narrow as the decision-maker who adjudicates the disputes chooses to make. This wording reflects similar loose wording in the Charter. For example, Section 7 of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 states that: A human right may be subject under law only to such reasonable limits as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom. It does not state, as one might expect, that rights can only be limited in order to protect the conflicting rights of another. The AHRC discussion paper notes that: [A]nti-discrimination legislation is remedial in character, and is designed to achieve the public purpose of redressing discrimination and upholding equal opportunity. Accordingly, the courts interpret exemptions narrowly. The loose wording in the Victorian Charter and EO Act, and the narrow interpretation adopted by the courts in anti-discrimination cases, allow Victorian decision-makers considerable discretion to arbitrarily restrict religious freedoms, in accordance with their particular values and policy positions, and in a manner contrary to the principles and provisions in the ICCPR and Siracusa Principles. Comments by the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission (VEOHRC) chief executive, Helen Szoke, suggest that the legislation was intentionally worded to achieve the outcome described above. Ms Szoke has made it quite clear that VEOHRC intends to encourage the application of a narrow interpretation by the courts so that, "Religious schools or religious charities, for example, will have to show how belonging to a particular religion is relevant to the job they are trying to fill." "In the case of religious education teachers or chaplains, this will be clear. However, in the case of office staff or the maths teacher it will need to be made explicit how religion is relevant to the job.",  Dr Szokes comments suggest a clear agenda to elevate equality rights in employment above the rights of religious schools to recruit staff who share and reflect their beliefs and values. ACL considers that this agenda is in direct contravention of the principles and provisions of the ICCPR and Siracusa principles in relation to freedom of religion. The approach of VEOHRC is consistent with a belief in some quarters that all limitations on who is eligible for a job should be abolished, or severely restricted, even if there is a multitude of other similar jobs available to the applicant. The proponents of such views do not appear to realise that setting these limits restricts the exercise of other fundamental human rights. It also has the effect of elevating the rights of individuals above those of groups, preventing groups from selecting those individuals who they consider are most suitable for the job. The Victorian Government also failed to properly balance anti-discrimination rights with those of religious freedom when it required doctors who have a conscientious objection to carrying out an abortion to refer the patient to another practitioner who does not have a conscientious objection. This decision ignored the fact that abortion is not a procedure that requires referral from a medical practitioner, as well as opposition from the Australian Medical Association in Victoria which pointed out that it already had a clear and workable code for handling conscientious objections to carrying out medical procedures. The negative consequences of the EO Act were further borne out when the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal ordered Christian Youth Camps to pay $5,000 to gay youth support group WayOut because it refused to accommodate them at its Phillip Island Adventure Resort. ACL considers that the operation of the Charter and the Equal Opportunity Act 1995 has served to establish a hierarchy of human rights that places non-discrimination provisions first and rights to freedom of religion and conscience last. Such an ordering has no basis in the ICCPR and actually works to subvert its intent. Given that provisions of the ICCPR establish freedom of religion as one of the very few non-derogable human rights in international law, ACL is concerned to ensure that the Federal Governments review of federal anti-discrimination legislation does not continue this inimical trend. International human rights standards about discrimination ACL supports the principles regarding non-discrimination and equality enunciated in Articles 2 and 26 of the ICCPR and applying to all human beings irrespective of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. However, as noted earlier in this submission, given the absence of a hierarchy of rights in the ICCPR, we are concerned to ensure that the pursuit of the legitimate rights to equality and non-discrimination are not elevated above the non-derogable right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. We also support the principle expressed in the non-binding Declaration on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity condemning violence and violation of human rights based on sexual orientation and gender identity. However, it is understood that the resolution has still not been officially adopted by the United Nations General Assembly. While the Yogyakarta Principles are represented in some quarters as establishing a universal guide to human rights which affirm binding international legal standards with which all States must comply, ACL understands that they reflect only the views of a narrow group of self-identified experts and are not binding in international law. It is also our understanding that the Principles have not been negotiated nor agreed to by member states of the United Nations, and that not a single UN human rights treaty mentions sexual orientation, and repeated attempts to pass resolutions promoting broad homosexual rights have been rejected by UN member states. As such, we do not consider that the Yogyakarta Principles merit the level of authority attached to them by the discussion paper. Commonwealth marriage law ACL reiterates its support for the current definition of marriage in the Marriage Act 1961 as being between a man and a woman. This has been the historical, cultural, and religious interpretation of the institution of marriage by the vast majority of peoples around the world, and ACL strongly opposes any initiatives to amend the Act to include same sex relationships. Marriage is central to the fabric of our society because it is the foundation of stable and secure family life. It reflects the biological reality found in nature, not an abstract social construct moulded to fit the whims of a politically activist minority. It carries the central commitment to fidelity and has been clearly shown to offer the most stable environment in which to bring up children. This is contrary to the lifestyle pursued by many in the gay and lesbian community which purposely rejects the very things that marriage holds sacred, chief among them commitment and monogamy. The State rightly values and encourages heterosexual marriage because it provides benefits to children and society that alternative constructs cannot. Conclusion ACL understands the Commissions desire to eliminate discrimination against the LGBTI community, and applauds any initiatives that might reduce incitement to violence, not just against LGBTI persons and their property, but against all persons on account of race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, age and appearance. However, we have serious reservations as to the efficacy of recent legislative initiatives in achieving an appropriate balance between rights to equality and non-discrimination and the non-derogable right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. These concerns also extend to similar legal initiatives to reduce vilification and prejudice in the community, which have worked to produce the very opposite outcomes. Freedom of thought, conscience and religion is a precious freedom that people of faith will not surrender lightly. Indeed there is no reason in a civil and democratic society such as we enjoy in Australia that people should be called upon to relinquish such a freedom. As ACL has pointed out previously, freedom of religion has been emphasised as a fundamental right for centuries in common law. It is also strongly reflected in domestic and international legislation, going back to the 1688 Bill of Rights, which sought to bring about a situation where religion, laws, and liberties might not again be in danger of being subverted. This is still part of Victorian statute law. It is ACLs view that significant legal and policy initiatives to improve anti-discrimination and equality over the past decade have been used as a vehicle to further secularist agendas to limit religious freedom in this country. ACL is concerned to ensure that the Federal Governments review of federal anti-discrimination legislation does not continue this inimical trend. ACL National Office November 2010  鱨վ, Freedom of Religion and Belief in the 21st Century, p.9.  A Dutch study in 2001 found that gays and lesbians experience higher rates of psychiatric illness, including depression, drug abuse and suicide attempts. This study acknowledged that Holland has a relatively tolerant attitude to same sex relationships, and suggested that the observed differences may result both from an interaction between both biological and social factors. Theo Sandfort, Ron de Graaf, et al., Same-sex Sexual Behavior and Psychiatric Disorders, Archives of General Psychiatry, 58(1): 85-91, p. 89 and Table 2 (January 2001), HYPERLINK "http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/58/8/721"http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/58/8/721.  United Nations, Economic and Social Council, U.N. Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation of Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Annex, UN Doc E/CN.4/1984/4 (1984). The 1984 Siracusa Declaration provides details on the interpretation of the limitation clause in ICCPR Article 18. General Comment No. 22: The right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 18) 30/07/1993.CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.4. The UN Human Rights Committee made various interpretive observations in General Comment 22 regarding the application and scope of ICCPR article 18.  Article 18(3) of the ICCPR.  Principles 1 and 3 of the Siracusa Declaration stipulate respectively that No limitations or grounds for applying them to rights guaranteed by the Covenant are permitted other than those contained in the terms of the Covenant itself, and All limitation clauses shall be interpreted strictly and in favor of the rights at issue.  The use of the word fundamental in this context implies the need for a proper balance to ensure that the rights of one group in the community do not automatically override the non-derogable right to religious freedom of another.  The quote is taken from Article 18(3) of the ICCPR.  Exceptions and Exemptions to the Equal Opportunity Act 1995, Options Paper by Victorian Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee, p. 108.  This requirement follows from the provisions of s. 83(3)(a) of the Equal Opportunity Act 2010.  Church can reject gays, single mums, The Age, 27 September 2010, HYPERLINK "http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-national/church-can-reject-gays-single-mums-20090927-g7ba.html"http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-national/church-can-reject-gays-single-mums-20090927-g7ba.html.  Helen Szoke made similar comments in a presentation delivered to the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission Religious Stakeholder Forum on Monday, 13 September 2010.  S. 8(1)(b) of the Victorian Abortion Law Reform Act 2008.  HYPERLINK "http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/UN_declaration_on_sexual_orientation_and_gender_identity"http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/UN_declaration_on_sexual_orientation_and_gender_identity  HYPERLINK "http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/"http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/      PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 2  PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 9 . / V W k l v w    - ъъt`H`/jh hTOJQJU^JmHnHu&h hTOJQJ^JmHnHu+h hT0JOJQJ^JmHnHsH u,jh hT5OJQJU^JmH sH $h hT0JOJQJ^JmH sH hTjhTU h hTOJQJ^JmH sH #h hT5OJQJ^JmH sH 7jhThT5OJQJU^JmHnHsH tH u8 & ' m 3 4 & 8# dxgd dgd $da$gd - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 Q R ^ _ ` z { | } ~  ̻̳jVV;̻̳5j#h hTOJQJU^JmHnHu&h hTOJQJ^JmHnHu+h hT0JOJQJ^JmHnHsH uhT'h hT0JOJQJ^JmHnHu4h hTB*OJQJ^JmHnHphsH tH ujhTU hTOJQJ^JmHnHu/jh hTOJQJU^JmHnHu5jX#h hTOJQJU^JmHnHu Z [ R S  'rCGdgd gd d7$8$H$gd & 8# dxgd  8 9 : T U V W ʲʗkWʲ<5j$h hTOJQJU^JmHnHu'h hT0JOJQJ^JmHnHu4h hTB*OJQJ^JmHnHphsH tH u hTOJQJ^JmHnHu5jT$h hTOJQJU^JmHnHu/jh hTOJQJU^JmHnHu&h hTOJQJ^JmHnHu+h hT0JOJQJ^JmHnHsH ujhTUhTW X Y Z [ \ x y 0 1 2 L İ߬ߖgVİ߬ߖ hTOJQJ^JmHnHu5jP%h hTOJQJU^JmHnHu&h hTOJQJ^JmHnHu+h hT0JOJQJ^JmHnHsH uhT'h hT0JOJQJ^JmHnHu4h hTB*OJQJ^JmHnHphsH tH ujhTU/jh hTOJQJU^JmHnHuL M N O P Q R S T p q ̻̳jVV;̻̳5jL&h hTOJQJU^JmHnHu&h hTOJQJ^JmHnHu+h hT0JOJQJ^JmHnHsH uhT'h hT0JOJQJ^JmHnHu4h hTB*OJQJ^JmHnHphsH tH ujhTU hTOJQJ^JmHnHu/jh hTOJQJU^JmHnHu5j%h hTOJQJU^JmHnHu  ʲʗkTB7h hTmH sH #h hT5OJQJ^JmH sH ,jh hT5OJQJU^JmH sH 4h hTB*OJQJ^JmHnHphsH tH u hTOJQJ^JmHnHu5j&h hTOJQJU^JmHnHu/jh hTOJQJU^JmHnHu&h hTOJQJ^JmHnHu+h hT0JOJQJ^JmHnHsH ujhTUhT  HJS[HIVV{####$(()+++,ݵݵh1h hTB*CJOJQJ^JaJmH phsH h hTmH sH #h hT5OJQJ^JmH sH -jh hT0JOJQJU^JmH sH &h hT6H*OJQJ^JmH sH &h hT6OJQJ]^JmH sH #h hT6OJQJ^JmH sH h hTOJQJ^JmH sH 'GIV!"##$d$&(*+++,a.. dxgd  & F Sd^Sgd dgd gd d7$8$H$gd ,a.t//2B2S222233333333333%8.8r8}88899====>>1?:?ڶȟyȟggڟ\ڟgh hTmH sH #h hT>*OJQJ^JmH sH #h hTH*OJQJ^JmH sH &h hT6H*OJQJ^JmH sH -jh hT0JOJQJU^JmH sH #h hT5OJQJ^JmH sH #h hT6OJQJ^JmH sH h hTOJQJ^JmH sH (h hTCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH $.013u5[6~79999=;_<z=>ABCDEGI"JHJ'KLN 7d^7gd gd dgd :?~????????@!@b@@AAAA[BuBBBBBCCGGq]D0jh hT0JOJQJU]^JmH sH &h hT6OJQJ]^JmH sH ,h hTB*OJQJ\^JmH phsH /h hT6B*OJQJ\^JmH phsH #h hT6OJQJ^JmH sH &h hT56OJQJ^JmH sH -jh hT0JOJQJU^JmH sH #h hT>*OJQJ^JmH sH h hTOJQJ^JmH sH GHHHJ'KJKQKVK\KNyOzO|O}O~OP8T9TUUVVVVVXĤtYtCt+h hT6CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 5jh hT0JCJOJQJU^JaJmH sH (h hTCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 4h hTB*CJH*OJQJ^JaJmH phsH >jh hT0JB*CJOJQJU^JaJmH phsH 1h hTB*CJOJQJ^JaJmH phsH #h hT6OJQJ^JmH sH h hTOJQJ^JmH sH NN~OPSUVWXXX1Y[\g____`ya{b`dgd dx[$\$gd dxgd dgd 7dx[$\$^7gd XX1Y[[[[\]]___`M`_``dbdmd|kkkkѽ{iRA hhTCJOJQJ^JaJ-jhhT0JCJOJQJU^JaJ#h hT6OJQJ^JmH sH -jh hT0JOJQJU^JmH sH #h hTOJQJ]^JmH sH 0jh hT0JOJQJU]^JmH sH &h hT6OJQJ]^JmH sH h hTOJQJ^JmH sH h hTmH sH #h hT5OJQJ^JmH sH `dadbdmdeWgdhijxkykzk{k|kkkkymnnnodx[$\$gd_ $$dxgd_ dxgd_dgd gd d7$8$H$gd kkkkkgmhmwmmm$n%ngnhnnnnnnnnnŸ~~o~VD#hhT5CJOJQJ^JaJ0jhhT0J5CJOJQJU^JaJhhT0JCJ^JaJjhTU%hhT0JB*CJ^JaJph!hhTB*CJ^JaJphhhTCJH*^JaJhhTCJ^JaJ%jhhT0JCJU^JaJhT hhTCJOJQJ^JaJ#hhTCJH*OJQJ^JaJnooo=p>p?pppRqSqTqpqqqrqrrrsssssssttetltmtntttпЫпппппjпU(hhTCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH /hhT6B*CJOJQJ\^JaJph,hhTB*CJOJQJ\^JaJph#hhTCJOJQJ\^JaJ&hhTCJOJQJ\]^JaJ hhTCJOJQJ^JaJ-jhhT0JCJOJQJU^JaJhT'hhT0J 5CJOJQJ^JaJ o>ppSqqqrssmttuvvwxxxxxx x x xgdLw hdx]hgd_ d1$gd_$dx`a$gd@X dxgd_dgd_ttttttuuuuuuuuuuvvvvvvvvvvvvvLwMwwwwwwwwwwwwxxxxxx xν壐ν{{ν{{ν壐ν壐(hhTCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH $hhT0JCJOJQJ^JaJjhTU#hhT6CJOJQJ^JaJ hhTCJOJQJ^JaJ-jhhT0JCJOJQJU^JaJhT+hhT6CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 0 x x xx%x&x'x(x.x/xFxGxHxIxKxMxNxձ#h hT5OJQJ^JmH sH %hTCJOJQJ^JaJmHnHu h\RhTCJOJQJ^JaJ)jh\RhTCJOJQJU^JaJhTmHnHuhTjhTU x x)x*x+x,x-x.xJxKxLxMxNxdgd $ ] a$gd\R$a$gd\R$ ] a$$a$ F 0 0P&P 1h:pv#. A!"#$% DpC 0P&P 1h:pv#. A!"#$% Dp@P&P 1h:pv#. A!"#$% DpF 00P&P 1h:pv#. A!"#$% DpC0P&P 1h:pv#. A!"#$% DpX#Dd Z   s PA@?Picture 1ACL logo"R"'Qsb.IYd^"DFV"'Qsb.IYdJFIFC     C   8" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?S(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((꺂z}ܟr׎;Lmd+3z95\<˛j((((((((((((((((((>&ܘ<6ɜ H5)W-0@*8k4hur#s  G9z |7X%p~jZ0ʝl<}beR&5U4R׎{aEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEP{9j{y?8~"L@8 GzkkwLs5hdY&<`F֌FA=+Dt1fzM ER((#.gK/\[pڲYn_![9Zҥ:TٝJ9w$@d+ɩ5Iɍ޻zEN/tTd((((((((((*7b*O=kc<Zʂ #iCkѿkךk&v w">1SӣVmF=B"~n?ZZĻJ>gIcIK7^>~Ֆ)h֤C=Y ^=E.+؈c2X߹2=k˾' fqUcbz'ۓW߳7x:SS SݳB,>\ W6N/ix=JT^7[÷#)c#&hSjɑ U/bW1H$GP}+^h:/L$KWf(ȥ|pFJ4km]v}9ٗt|++SNufWw8.g~$riWI*#ZnJD(o]/~#[OiIO$uS|USyl*3Sb9)ZO uƅa|-/ƺ_ũiw`\0A  b9>.??ɚkŦmiZzM7\C~1ϷϷϷϷϷϷϷϷ–ҿ6]<6Djr\D5UiV"'PH^^9tH_vLI21o ;(g܀_VpYYmo v8aP81_<~v$(%ܳ&T++JyE iMnazWӦJ~-_nHTB,zj)THXV*FAFMTJ5# FOڧេEʴ=ݴ",-?kK[CHQ)Tݮ"7Wb=Ɵ3#/s54D7k-smˀKcu dLv}VYh# [@Gi^bUI$9 ! C=KUrγy#zk6|ӷe-vW࿵'쿦|w$vL8J8=Td{( YQ7fn8Ջև_ONL⋋dyZ 6(WS=Pqɯ>?y_ncA|0ק*Ԗ⩪XIB;/GmiZzM7K^\guC~AEW1QEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEW >%|֠tMV%.bxLژ֕GJjwFu A??|=s}ZKT.>ץM3v^{• :_ ~ӿ׊[fѾr^1(>#']qlϔO  'Ec^l4qᚻM*~lB:Xi}wLjJ/iH܏!vF_* W=Ѽ%WLEc 5|&!~9OP/K0Sܠ*O*Y{)4UW&] Sw`S5r@YU{_#~p鿶 v!]Jg 9Bz(g={oۉ(S{/᦭>~.E 7 Ng):ܠ`u5oF|ŌN{8~=7uOBq3w6rdOtg~o?kꟄ? t/>ރ ,$\qW>W `\wSt:>Z=>*᣻< ^DGo(O3 +((((((([s&マ>]+PENJM tJ}:L"HXIJ_a]0;W/յhͨ\eT]M?@`R1S{qc몺iZۄ#͐owY~5+ֵ:nomc"FHJ4H݁ $pZ5'̏x+3SA|ѭ,ז߻. epX.}1H[y7O/I-.~/T5ovl}ߏچk-[" ="XݒE^xJf+-H)H}l!:knֱ!R2א˩\jMK'w'c;NOnoZͨxĚw]Ь,=Ed\)u'~ 2֨NFu_w'zur6H*+ 8?Wljtkˋ;Wluee]T98OQ'ĽEՕܒGʲ2"B cܵ$=-2:;H#?0Ͼ+~:xLjW%#)W=֯6xox1_T{\)g2 D݂#h-KTE'+Цխ4˭Vo=)ILq]mm gy[R\e.gq#X?u9I^2 Too 狂joCtˤ'm.#?$h!3G-ɵH,E͒#p@1_,>~?& 'mp= 0q<_x_fv}xE341ɼo=-xҩ;*#m\9j +{O>W@|;|Z\|L>i{M:m[yI#E8d>{e >!'#ޥk6ؠ eFA XG&WӾW)&/$XQT[M쵏}.>pֳ?rU>"t~-|PwPfOe{2X 9 kku_YΝ.ѓyِFI޸%Z~\W:Ϟ7h{ēQTb{JI56PK;İ*FAMemGzn<y Jv6X#⸿蚎Mmu1P*[4[pzyevp{VV4kVsb\#_O$ʎX+bUW zu5Qx6Ϯ_x}d7(.b`[QK-@ @s,='?jp9,;V^H\iN #wA) Z( ( ( ( M94P#N-.UI 6Q  >o~mdiwCf- ,ܩqҺ(A -#R"ѓ욑F421evvbہ9ݜ* ѭ{\򻴓,"Yr)ttP$ѬWTXyrѣ;*8WP-SPwΞTO*6ng܎ !8DW_ xw2ɣF[n@ ||?Q <2" Rt[bi?qiĊskt>lO"n!`9jkTl4GBh#о9oMr8Y$جAlPpO-{x[Skʹ4jסdmi=+5x~=cL> IZ{Z HrI" gpegSMV\[:oh56H- ;;n:Tu1o zIOg=#7?][^u(;<;]gj|8iúƃv<6Pd6rqN&ƿF9d֛6+GI4%S;"X۴#LNJI|24Oא8>U$r]Fp⢝VkM#Ҽi>-AceZrk,$.`` 'OtONLOԮ2$͂A#_iqx*[?۵k1RO6_9E<ϣ|,_4 útFoXA:ps#sc:qM{k#XNNB/%[wAWWO# )Vf 3Y5sg(4e]B-Il<ͮ4[gܝJ8pVN?.OŪ=hHNl&0bb9|x*ra9?'񇆵[]^ qy ,?ڗ̛Y U-nɫT!gy_C;Q$}[UndKaDT|8#u-e<kHtS ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( if.:+"ەVݵ;kŦ$*\nW'[л|E9cSӮ.b[=2q]X64{ݚb2=3 ULưE8`9BӄcH7 78^'~? ?zj,2h F9bԸ-y=QZP8QLlQڝE4F1ҍҝE7`bZuRE0 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( |gt,"&F:dk0jzk<+33"۴2r ޅocfgi>"әA .z+4VT9ynuX[flWQ2"?kxk+Ҥ8ZmqQEyQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEX^"8Ir:0cVQtmK۹=UŸ9$2bIY,TGrD qWF+/L{ٯD3"֢uMlE$mubEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEW=%V], ;qקXhfCU=CZӻn)^IIX] h/nobx13ϷڱϷϷϷϷϷϷϷϷϷϷϷϷϷϷϷ18<r+@!p c^Qi;!82>8Q5I݃Mu ;spO{+V9{HQ vMmq*|85>WgJ(C ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (9: n!]W3ERuomij>8n3֓t"w]I :!IO?z gcz$v 0c ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( LKLbry|J7),"F=FnxN%? \;@_^6–\8#}.*:q˟R^ ZAK^aEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPYݵ]O BNs+=Ns"̮rz5u6;N@8~t6(g2 $XQUV.8EZn,,t(OP(((((((((((((((((((((((((((~DyK _Toc278527819~DyK _Toc278527820~DyK _Toc278527821f~DyK _Toc278527822o~DyK _Toc278527823s~DyK _Toc278527824e~DyK _Toc278527825i~DyK _Toc278527826pf)  66666666666666666666666666666666666666666 6666666666 666666666666 6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XVxOJQJ_HmH nH sH tH d`d LwNormalx7$8$H$-B*CJOJQJ^J_HaJmH phsH tH H@H M,0 Heading 1 d@&5OJQJ^Jtt z0 Heading 2$$7$8$@&H$a$+6B*CJOJQJ]^JaJmH phsH DA`D Default Paragraph FontRiR 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k ( 0No List D/D M,0Heading 1 Char5B*^JphZ/Z z0Heading 2 Char&6CJOJQJ]^JaJmH sH tHbob W0Default 7$8$H$-B*CJOJQJ^J_HaJmH phsH tH V@"V u0 Footnote TextCJOJQJ^JaJmH sH \/1\ u0Footnote Text Char CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH tHd&@Ad u0"Footnote Reference,Footnotes refssH*^JD@RD U0List Paragraph ^m$pC@bp |mI0Body Text Indent1$`$CJKHOJPJQJ^JaJnHtHn/qn |mI0Body Text Indent Char,CJKHOJPJQJ^JaJmHnHsHtH:U@: z0 Hyperlink>*B*^Jphddj^@j J@0 Normal (Web)dd7$8$H$[$\$B*CJOJQJ^JaJphj @j - 0Footer 9r 7$8$H$)B*CJOJQJ^JaJmH phsH tH N/N - 0 Footer Char CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH tH 2X@2 oyP0Emphasis 6]^J`+@` oyP0 Endnote Text7$8$H$B*CJOJQJ^JaJphF/F oyP0Endnote Text Char CJ^JaJB*B oyP0Endnote ReferenceH*^J.W@. 240Strong 5\^J^^ [0second!dd7$8$H$[$\$B*CJOJQJ^JaJphJV!J 1L0FollowedHyperlink>*B* ^JphL2L $ 0 Balloon Text#CJOJQJ^JaJX/AX # 0Balloon Text CharB*CJOJQJ^JaJphl l Zs0 TOC Heading%$$7$8$@& H$ B*CJOJQJ\^JaJph6_*@* Zs0TOC 1&d8r8 (Zs0Header' B#D/D 'Zs0 Header CharB*OJQJ^JphPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] +++0677;?yG|G8LSUNp_+! A0 S I  b e NpHϨ ******------------KKKKKKKKKN- W L  ,:?GXknt xNx=?ABCDEGIJLNOQR G.N`do xNx>@FHKMPS.Vkv.014Q_{}~9UWX[x1MOPSpNpXX X%X%X%X%X%X%X%X% $&-EGN!!u O K  ; ` e XXXX8@0(  B S  ?Np _Toc278527819 _Toc278527820 _Toc278527821 _Toc278527822 _Toc278527823 _Toc278527824 _Toc278527825 _Toc278527826I#1PWb\Op U$10QXl\Op L*k#C41k#qp42c k}4x6'=N&hyPO! FtW! Z! ROvfne ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o P^P`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o P^P`OJQJo(^`^J() ^`OJPJo( pp^p`^J. ^` ^J.^`^J.^`^J.^`^J.^`^J.PP^P`^J. h^h`OJQJo(v ^`OJQJo( 8^8`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( p^p`OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o P^P`OJQJo( h^h`OJQJo(v ^`OJQJo( 8^8`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( p^p`OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( h^h`OJQJo(v ^`OJQJo( 8^8`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( p^p`OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( h^h`OJQJo(v ^`OJQJo( 8^8`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( p^p`OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo(  ^ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( p^p`OJQJo(o @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( P^P`OJQJo(o  ^ `OJQJo( Z'=Nqp4 yPOROvL*FtWC41k}4                   o`RUp`RUz`RUq`RUv`RUr`RUs`RUq`RUt`RUu`RUv`RUu`RUw`RUp`RU x`RU`RUy`RUz`RU{`RU`RU|`RU}`RU}`RUo`RU~`RUw`RU`RUt`RU`RU`RU|`RU`RU{`RU`RU`RU`RU~`RUDx_ggf%24b  v G ZY  + ^I - @X [=v|: @H1 L'~Ykx$zzTNZr?!e"3"8":?"N=#b#%'fg'D)C*c'+/[+M,V/XO37]3H46'5c/6W9n9-: ;y!;G;6<S?/m?<@J@@p@_BDNEsF&EFz]I|mIuIfJ'KMKXL1LoQM N2NO TOoyPGQ?YQ(iQ\R>RHSTT[U-Vu6V WNZE[2\_ ]<]w^-^v=`A`m`p:a>aBaNclcdg>fZ0gFh_Thirk>nEp>rZsqt`u4uuaJwLwbw x'xhxrez{{ |_A|)E|^} j}~E-~kr0Qe|23o@/HvV<89Iiw lv1C3dpPRj:|rh ()P*~:_Uc4)%,a=W|2dsu%r4[e* V Ms_$ ';M%o(|v#, M!ASACR ha^a%s^OkDCNiu?U D z/dz!B\ aT_f!%#[ "|"-'gs NT.A>ZbdlsXvprRuWcc@Np8@Unknown G* Times New Roman5Symbol3. * Arial7.{ @CalibriK PMingLiUs5.*aTahoma7K@Cambria?= * Courier New;WingdingsA BCambria Math"h{f{fIJ&n02@P $Pce|! xx GlenBethany Hender0         Oh+'0 $ H T ` lx GlenNormal_Wordconv.dotmBethany Hender2Microsoft Office Outlook@F#@ػ؉@~?M@~?M՜.+,D՜.+,, hp|    Title 8@ _PID_HLINKSA`T02_Toc2785278260,_Toc2785278250&_Toc2785278240 _Toc2785278230_Toc2785278220_Toc2785278210_Toc2785278200_Toc2785278194`http://www.acl.org.au/vmailto:natoffice@acl.org.au\] %http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/J#Whttp://en.wikisource.org/wiki/UN_declaration_on_sexual_orientation_and_gender_identityn2ghttp://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-national/church-can-reject-gays-single-mums-20090927-g7ba.htmlnn7http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/58/8/721  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghjklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F.Data UH'1Tablei8CWordDocument\SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjy  F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q