A Time to Value - Media Pack
A Time to Value - Proposal for a National Paid Maternity Leave Scheme
Media Pack
The contribution of
		    paid maternity leave to economic security, workplace disadvantage and
		    equality 
Women incur significant
		  workplace disadvantage from the onset of family responsibilities, not
		  just in the immediate period following the birth of a child but over
		  the longer term. This inevitably results in lessened economic security
		  for women, including during retirement. The inequality of outcomes for
		  men and women as a result of the shared duty of raising a family is
		  self evident. While some may consider that this inequality is balanced
		  by the communal nature of the family unit, modern family realities suggest
		  that increasingly, economic disadvantage accrues to the individual. 
Economic security
Paid Maternity
		  Leave is a form of income replacement that allows the mother to provide
		  full time care for her child for a limited period. To the extent of
		  the payment provided it assists women with economic security at the
		  time of the birth; this would be especially so for low income women
		  who are, under Australia's current paid maternity leave arrangements,
		  the least likely to have paid leave. A period of paid leave, even if
		  relatively short, also enables women to afford a longer period of unpaid
		  leave. In addition to this, paid maternity leave assists with the affordability
		  of child-rearing.
A payment period
		  of fourteen weeks at a sustainable rate enables families to maintain
		  their standard of living and as the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees'
		  Association stated, the primary objective of a paid maternity leave
		  scheme must be the provision of a payment which is sufficient to ensure
		  that the woman and her family are able to live with dignity during the
		  period before and after the child is born. [1]
Workplace disadvantage
It is not difficult
		  to see how workplace disadvantage builds from child bearing; women are
		  almost always the primary carer of dependent children and so frequently
		  begin by leaving paid work entirely, or changing to a job of lesser
		  pay but with better hours for the family, moving from full time to part
		  time or casual work and by no longer being able to enjoy the mobility
		  that leads to career or job advancement. Job disadvantage contributes
		  to loss of economic security as measured by female/male earnings disparities,
		  wealth holdings and later, to superannuation entitlements and financial
		  security in old age. 
This division of
		  labour creates systemic discrimination. It is exacerbated by direct
		  and indirect discrimination against women. Pregnant women are frequently
		  dismissed or demoted and discrimination on the basis of family responsibilities
		  figures highly in complaints to HREOC. While not a total solution, paid
		  maternity leave can contribute to overcoming these barriers. Paid maternity
		  leave will also make it easier for women to combine work and family
		  responsibilities. 
Equality
A cross section
		  of the community considered that paid maternity leave would contribute
		  to equality both directly and symbolically. For example, one submission
		  stated that "[n]o civilised country, which regards equality between
		  the sexes as important, could neglect to address paid maternity leave." [2] Others considered it would address "motherhood
		  discrimination in the workforce", current inequities in the availability
		  of paid maternity leave and, as Coles Myer's submission stated, that
		  it would "contribute to workplace equity".
 1.
          Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees' Association, Submission 173,
          p11.
        2. Philip Gammage, Submission 91, p2.