International Review of Indigenous issues in 2000: Australia - 1. Introduction
Archived
You are in an archived section of the website. This information may not be current.
This page was first created in December, 2012
International Review of Indigenous issues in 2000: Australia
1. Introduction
The issue of Indigenous
        people and racism is among the most complex and divisive in Australia
        today. The source of this complexity and division is to be found in the
        history of race relations in Australia, which commenced with the illegitimate
        acquisition of sovereignty in 1788 under the auspices of the doctrine
        of terra nullius. Over successive generations policies and practices have
        aimed to eliminate Indigenous people, to 'smooth the pillow' of what was
        seen as a dying race, and later to assimilate Indigenous people within
        the white culture. It has only been since the 1960's that Indigenous people
        have been allowed to participate in mainstream society on an equal footing
        and access full citizenship rights including the right to vote, improved
        access to healthcare, education and welfare and so forth). This discriminatory
        history now results in Indigenous people experiencing disadvantage against
        all indicators of socio-economic well-being. This disadvantage is profound,
        and due to factors such as the extremely young age structure of the Indigenous
        population, seems likely to continue for some time yet.
The past ten years
        has seen a greater acknowledgement of this situation, including:
- the recognition
 in the 1992 Mabo decision (Mabo v Queensland (No.2) (1992) 175 CLR 1)
 that Indigenous people owned this land prior to 1788, and may have continuing
 rights to land and waters (native title);
- the findings of
 the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, which highlighted
 the relationship between Indigenous disadvantage and over-representation
 in the criminal justice system, and the role of historical treatment
 of Indigenous people in creating this situation;
- the findings of
 the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait
 Islander 黑料情报站 From their Families, which considered policies of
 forcible removal of Indigenous children from their families between
 1910 and 1970; and
- the establishment
 in 1991 of the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation - a Council of
 prominent leaders across all walks of Australian life to promote better
 relations between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people, and to consider
 whether a document of reconciliation would assist in the process. The
 Council handed its final report to Parliament at the end of 2000.
In the past five
        years there has also been a strong counter-movement to these changes,
        which has found expression in the rise of Pauline Hanson's One Nation
        Party. This party has run on a xenophobic and race-based platform, particularly
        focusing on Indigenous issues - for example, the belief that Indigenous
        people get 'special treatment' through such measures as recognition of
        land rights and government program funding etc. This counter-movement
        has highlighted the division in the Australian community about Indigenous
        issues, in particular, in regard to the level of support for the recognition
        of Indigenous rights. For instance, views that Indigenous rights are 'separate'
        rights and confer additional benefits on Indigenous people remain prominent
        and are occasionally advocated by the federal government in their policies.
The sensitivity of
        these issues is demonstrated by the Government's reaction to the recent
        international scrutiny of Australia before three United Nations human
        rights treaty committees, under the periodic reporting requirements. An
        'early warning / urgent action' procedure was also invoked by the Committee
        on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in 1998 over concerns at inconsistencies
        between amendments to the native title legislation and Australia's obligations
        under CERD. Australia has come in for much criticism of Indigenous affairs
        policies by the UN committees, and has responded aggressively through
        attacks on the treaty system.
This paper seeks
        to provide an overview of some of the key issues concerning Indigenous
        Peoples and discrimination in Australia and a summary of the response
        of UN human rights treaty committees to these issues.
        
Last updated 7 October 2003.