Mature Workers: 2. Myths and facts around older workers
Mature Workers:
2.	Myths and facts around older
	    workers
Negative stereotypes and assumptions of a ‘use by date’ are
          significant barriers that older Australians face when they look for meaningful
        work. 
With Australia’s workforce ageing at a rapid rate and some industries
          facing skills shortages, buying into these stereotypes will increasingly come at
          a heavy cost to employers.
That’s why it’s so important to separate the myths from the
          facts.
- Myth 1: Mature age workers will cost the business more for their
experience
 - Myth 2: Mature age workers may be prone to health problems 
 - Myth 3: There is no long term benefit to training and developing mature
age workers
 - Myth 4: Younger workers are better performers than mature age workers            
 - Myth 5:  Mature age workers won’t be able to adapt to changes and
new technology
 
        
MYTH 1:  Mature age workers will cost the business more for their
        experience.
FACT: Mature age employees can save costs to employers through
          increased rates of retention. 
- Workers aged over 55 are five times less likely to change jobs
compared with workers aged 20-24, reducing ongoing recruitment and training
costs.[1] - Mature workers deliver an average net benefit of $1,956 per year to their
employer compared to the rest of the workforce - a result of increased
retention, lower rates of absenteeism, decreased costs of recruitment and
greater investment returns on
training.[2]
 
FACT: Retention of mature age workers can help maintain
          corporate memory and save employers the cost of ‘re-inventing the
          ·É³ó±ð±ð±ô’.[3]
        
FACT: There is a strategic business advantage of having employees who
          reflect the diversity of the customer base as the Australian population
          ages.[4]
        
        
MYTH 2: Mature age workers may be prone to health problems.
FACT: Australians are living longer and are healthier.
- ABS reports show that the current life expectancy is 78 years for men and 83
years for women – a two and three year increase respectively since
1994.[5] - A 2005 ABS survey found the proportion of Australians aged 55-64 reporting
their health as ‘good’, ‘very good’ or
‘excellent’ was 75.5% – an increase of four per cent since
1995.[6]
 
FACT: Mature age workers are less likely to take sick leave
          and experience work related injuries.
- A 2006 ABS survey found that mature workers were the least likely group to
take days off due to their own illness or as a carer. In the two week period
prior to the survey nearly half the number of mature workers had days off
compared to workers aged 25-34.[7] - ABS data indicates that mature age workers are less likely to experience
work-related injuries compared to younger
workers.[8]
 
        
MYTH 3: There is no long term benefit to training and developing mature
        age workers.
FACT: Australia’s ageing population means business will need to
          invest in mature age employees. 
- Based on current trends the working age population will grow by just 125,000
for the entire decade from 2020 to 2029 – less than a tenth of
current pace. - Research of OECD countries shows that those countries that provide a higher
level of training to older workers have workers leaving the labour market at an
older age.[9]
 
        
MYTH 4: Younger workers are better performers than mature age
        workers.
FACT: Experience is a better indicator of productivity than
          age.
- A study of OECD nations concluded that verbal skills, communication and
intelligence remain unchanged as a person
ages.[10]
 
        
MYTH 5:  Mature age workers won’t be able to adapt to changes and
        new technology. 
FACT: Older people are the fastest growing users of
          technology.
- ABS data shows that Australians aged 55-64 are the fastest growing users of
information technology.[11]
 
FACT: Older people can be trained to use new
          technologies.
- International studies indicate that appropriate training provided in a
supportive environment can greatly assist older workers to learn new technology
systems.[12] - A survey of employers showed they were more likely to recruit someone with
direct experience in the industry but with limited computing skills compared to
a person who is good with computers but has no industry
experience.[13]
 
[1] Australian Bureau of Statistics
          (2006) Labour Mobility Survey, Cat. No.
          6209.0.
  [2] Business, Work and
          Ageing (2000) Profiting from Maturity: The Social and Economic Costs of Mature
          Age Unemployment.
  [3] Australian
          Government, Department of Health and Aged Care (2001) Population Ageing in
            the Australian Economy, Access
          Economics.
  [4] ibid
  [5] Australian Bureau of
          Statistics, (2006) Measures of Australia's Progress, Cat. No.
          1370.0.
  [6] Australian Bureau of
          Statistics (2006) National Health Survey: Summary of Results, 2004-05 Cat. No. 4364.0.
  [7] ibid
  [8]Australian Bureau of
          Statistics (2006) Work-Related Injuries, Australia, Cat. No.
          6324.0.
  [9] Organisation for
          Economic Cooperation and Development (2006) Live Longer Work Longer, OECD
          Publishing, ,
          accessed 27 August 2007.
  [10] Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2006) Live Longer Work
    Longer, OECD Publishing, ,
          accessed 27 August 2007.
  [11] Australian Bureau of Statistics (2005) Year Book Australia, Cat. No.
          1301.0.
  [12] Research and Policy
          Committee of Committee for Economic Development (1999) New Opportunities for
            Older Workers
  [13] Bittman,
          M., Flick, M., & Rice, J. (2001) The recruitment of older Australian
            workers – A survey of employers in high growth industry, Social Policy
          Research Centre, University of NSW.